RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-2535-5895
Maternal and Neonatal Risk Factors Associated with Positive Toxicology Results
Autoren
Funding None.
Abstract
Objective
The incidence of substance use disorder (SUD) during pregnancy continues to increase; however, the identification of SUD is challenging. The significance of individual risk factors and their association with toxicology is contentious. To identify maternal and neonatal risk factors associated with positive toxicology results for nonprescribed substance use during pregnancy.
Study Design
This retrospective study included pregnant persons and their infants, who were screened for predetermined risk factors for SUD during pregnancy. The toxicology test results of pregnant persons' urine and infants' urine, meconium/umbilical cord were correlated with risk factors.
Results
Maternal risk factors (history of prepregnancy or current SUD, on medication for opioid use disorders, insufficient prenatal care, sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections) and neonatal risk factors (neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome, intrauterine growth restriction) showed a correlation with toxicology results.
Conclusion
Combining maternal and neonatal risk factors with toxicology testing may accurately identify SUD in pregnancy.
Key Points
-
Minimal prenatal care can be associated with positive infant toxicology.
-
Intrauterine growth restriction/small for gestational age can be associated with positive infant toxicology.
-
Combined maternal and infant testing is more sensitive at detecting prenatal substance use.
Keywords
neonatal opioid withdrawal - drug use - pregnancy - neonatology - drug testing - prenatal drug testing - indications for drug testing - drug toxicologyEthical Approval
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Montefiore St. Luke's Cornwall Hospital Newburgh.
Authors' Contributions
Substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data—H.P., P.K., K.H., G.D. Drafting or revising the article critically for important intellectual content—H.P., P.K., K.H. Final approval of the version to be published—P.K.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 15. Oktober 2024
Angenommen: 07. Februar 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
10. Februar 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. März 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 West KD, Ali MM, Blanco M, Natzke B, Nguyen L. Prenatal substance exposure and neonatal abstinence syndrome: state estimates from the 2016-2020 transformed Medicaid statistical information system. Matern Child Health J 2023; 27 (Suppl. 01) 14-22
- 2 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2022 NSDUH Detailed Tables. . CBHSQ Data. Samhsa.gov; 2022 https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2022-nsduh-detailed-tables
- 3 Lisonkova S, Richter LL, Ting J. et al. Neonatal abstinence syndrome and associated neonatal and maternal mortality and morbidity. Pediatrics 2019; 144 (02) e20182058
- 4 Kocherlakota P. Neonatal abstinence syndrome. Pediatrics 2014; 134 (02) e547-e561
- 5 Committee opinion no. 633: Alcohol abuse and other substance use disorders: ethical issues in obstetric and gynecologic practice. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125 (06) 1529-1537
- 6 González-Colmenero E, Concheiro-Guisán A, Lorenzo-Martínez M. et al. Drug testing in biological samples vs. maternal surveys for the detection of substance use during whole pregnancy. J Addict Dis 2021; 39 (02) 175-182
- 7 Garg M, Garrison L, Leeman L. et al. Validity of self-reported drug use information among pregnant women. Matern Child Health J 2016; 20 (01) 41-47
- 8 Characterization of U.S. State Laws Requiring Health Care Provider Reporting of Perinatal Substance Use; Womens Health Issues 2017; 27 (03) 264-270
- 9 Patel E, Bandara S, Saloner B. et al. Heterogeneity in prenatal substance use screening despite universal screening recommendations: findings from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2016-2018. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2021; 3 (05) 100419
- 10 Coleman-Cowger VH, Oga EA, Peters EN, Trocin KE, Koszowski B, Mark K. Accuracy of three screening tools for prenatal substance use. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133 (05) 952-961
- 11 Boden SL, Jones CW, Cabacungan ET. Improved maternal and infant outcomes with serial, self-reported early prenatal substance use screening. Matern Child Health J 2021; 25 (07) 1118-1125
- 12 Oga EA, Mark K, Peters EN, Coleman-Cowger VH. Validation of the NIDA-modified ASSIST as a screening tool for prenatal drug use in an urban setting in the United States. J Addict Med 2020; 14 (05) 423-430
- 13 Hadland SE, Levy S. Objective testing. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 2016; l 25 (03) 549-565
- 14 Smith BL, Hall ES, McAllister JM. et al. Rates of substance and polysubstance use through universal maternal testing at the time of delivery. J Perinatol 2022; 42 (08) 1026-1031
- 15 Patrick SW, Barfield WD, Poindexter BB. Neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. Pediatrics 2020; 146 (05) e2020029074
- 16 Byrd DP, Bartlett TR. Drug testing practices and policies of labor and delivery units across the Southeastern United States. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2023; 52 (01) 72-83
- 17 Wood KE, McMillin GA, Krasowski MD. Risk-based newborn drug testing in a setting with a low prevalence of maternal drug use. Hosp Pediatr 2019; 9 (08) 593-600
- 18 Roberts SCM, Nuru-Jeter A. Universal screening for alcohol and drug use and racial disparities in child protective services reporting. J Behav Health Serv Res 2012; 39 (01) 3-16
- 19 Patrick SW, Schiff DM. Committee on Substance Use and Prevention. AAP Committee on Substance Use and Prevention. A public health response to opioid use in pregnancy. Pediatrics 2017; 139 (03) e20164070
- 20 Olaniyan A, Hawk M, Mendez DD, Albert SM, Jarlenski M, Chang JC. Racial inequities in drug tests ordered by clinicians for pregnant people who disclose prenatal substance use. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 142 (05) 1169-1178
- 21 Bogen DL, Whalen BL, Kair LR, Vining M, King BA. Wide variation found in care of opioid-exposed newborns. Acad Pediatr 2017; 17 (04) 374-380
- 22 Hudak ML, Tan RC. Committee on Drugs, Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American Academy of Pediatrics. Neonatal drug withdrawal. Pediatrics 2012; 129 (02) e540-e560
- 23 Perlman NC, Cantonwine DE, Smith NA. Racial differences in indications for obstetrical toxicology testing and relationship of indications to test results. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2022; 4 (01) 100453
- 24 Karr AJ, Rayens MK, Scott LK. Neonatal abstinence syndrome: effectiveness of targeted umbilical cord drug screening. J Perinatol 2022; 42 (08) 1038-1043
- 25 Martins JG, Biggio JR, Abuhamad A. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Electronic address: pubs@smfm.org. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #52: diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: (replaces Clinical Guideline Number 3, April 2012). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223 (04) B2-B17
- 26 Palmer KL, Wood KE, Krasowski MD. Evaluating a switch from meconium to umbilical cord tissue for newborn drug testing: a retrospective study at an academic medical center. Clin Biochem 2017; 50 (06) 255-261
- 27 Wabuyele SL, Colby JM, McMillin GA. Detection of drug-exposed newborns. Ther Drug Monit 2018; 40 (02) 166-185
- 28 Cotten SW. Drug testing in the neonate. Clin Lab Med 2012; 32 (03) 449-466
- 29 Wood KE, Sinclair LL, Rysgaard CD, Strathmann FG, McMillin GA, Krasowski MD. Retrospective analysis of the diagnostic yield of newborn drug testing. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14 (01) 250
- 30 Weir S, Posner HE, Zhang J, Willis G, Baxter JD, Clark RE. Predictors of prenatal and postpartum care adequacy in a Medicaid managed care population. Womens Health Issues 2011; 21 (04) 277-285
- 31 Kotelchuck M, Cheng ER, Belanoff C. et al. The prevalence and impact of substance use disorder and treatment on maternal obstetric experiences and birth outcomes among singleton deliveries in Massachusetts. Matern Child Health J 2017; 21 (04) 893-902
- 32 Ben J, Cormack D, Harris R, Paradies Y. Racism and health service utilisation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2017; 12 (12) e0189900
- 33 Johnson AA, Hatcher BJ, El-Khorazaty MN. et al. Determinants of inadequate prenatal care utilization by African American women. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2007; 18 (03) 620-636
- 34 Eslier M, Deneux-Tharaux C, Schmitz T. et al. Association between language barrier and inadequate prenatal care utilization among migrant women in the PreCARE prospective cohort study. Eur J Public Health 2023; 33 (03) 403-410
- 35 Gadson A, Akpovi E, Mehta PK. Exploring the social determinants of racial/ethnic disparities in prenatal care utilization and maternal outcome. Semin Perinatol 2017; 41 (05) 308-317
- 36 Gersch H, Shah D, Chroust A, Bailey B. Can umbilical cord testing add to maternal urine drug screen for evaluation of infants at risk of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome?. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2023; 36 (01) 2211706
- 37 Siegel MR, Cohen SJ, Koenigs K. et al. Assessing the clinical utility of toxicology testing in the peripartum period. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2023; 5 (07) 100963
- 38 Sujan AC, Alexeeff SE, Slama NE. et al. Agreement between self-reports and urine toxicology measures of illicit methamphetamine and cocaine use during early pregnancy. J Addict Med 2024; 18 (01) 28-32
- 39 Berra A, Kamo S, Mohnot S. et al. The association between antenatal maternal self-reported substance use, maternal characteristics, and obstetrical variables. J Addict Med 2019; 13 (06) 464-469
- 40 Jarlenski M, Barry CL, Gollust S, Graves AJ, Kennedy-Hendricks A, Kozhimannil K. Polysubstance use among US women of reproductive age who use opioids for nonmedical reasons. Am J Public Health 2017; 107 (08) 1308-1310
- 41 Baravelli CM, Macsali F, Telle K. et al. Impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy-related healthcare utilisation: a prospective nationwide registry study. BMJ Open 2022; 12 (10) e064118
- 42 Lien J, Hayes T, Liu-Smith F, Rana D. Comparing maternal substance use and perinatal outcomes before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Perinatol 2023; 43 (05) 664-669
