RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/a-2517-1878
Multi-strategy endoscopic submucosal dissection of a challenging lesion
Over the years, advancements in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) have significantly refined and simplified the technique, allowing for successful endoscopic resection of increasingly complex lesions. Determining the right strategy or tool can be challenging and is not bound by strict rules – sometimes, in complex cases, you end up using every tool available.
A 79-year-old woman was referred for endoscopic resection of a 25-mm, Paris-IIa non-granular lesion, described as a sessile serrated lesion. Assessment with virtual chromoendoscopy revealed a focal JNET-2B pattern, raising suspicion of superficial submucosal invasive cancer, leading to the decision to perform ESD ([Video 1]). The lesion was situated in a challenging position in the right colon, where scope maneuverability was poor. The saline-immersion technique was utilized to stabilize the scope and improve lesion assessment [1]. Circumferential incision and trimming were performed with a 1.5-mm HYBRIDknife flex T-type (Erbe Elektromedizin Gmbh, Tübingen, Germany), while also benefiting from the buoyancy effect of the saline [2]. A double-clip and rubber band were placed (while still underwater) to create traction and improve exposure of the plane ([Fig. 1] a, b) [3]. High-pressure injection through the knife allowed efficient submucosal lifting, and dissection was performed using EndoCut I mode (VIO 3, Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH). Large vessels were precoagulated with the plate at the tip of the knife using SoftCoag mode ([Fig. 1] d). Traction with the tip of the knife of the submucosal fibers allowed safe completion of the dissection ([Fig. 1] c). The 50 × 30-mm specimen was successfully removed en bloc in 28 minutes.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a suspicious lesion in the right colon in a difficult position, involving multiple strategies and tools to remove the lesion en bloc.Video 1

Histology revealed R0-resection of a poorly differentiated pT1 adenocarcinoma with 930-µm submucosal invasion, presence of lymphatic invasion and low grade tumor budding ([Fig. 2]). Absence of local or distant metastasis was confirmed by computed tomography, and the patient was referred for completion surgery.


Although the different strategies used to optimize ESD are often presented as competitors, we believe that they should be combined because of their complementary advantages.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AQ_2AD_3AD
E-Videos is an open access online section of the journal Endoscopy, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy.
All papers include a high-quality video and are published with a Creative Commons
CC-BY license. Endoscopy E-Videos qualify for HINARI discounts and waivers and eligibility is automatically checked during the submission
process. We grant 100% waivers to articles whose corresponding authors are based in
Group A countries and 50% waivers to those who are based in Group B countries as classified
by Research4Life (see: https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/).
This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos.
Conflict of Interest
R. Legros, J. Albouys and J. Jacques: ERBE, Olympus, Fujifilm, Pentax: ESD training; Boston Scientific: LAMS training. H. Lepetit: Boston Scientific, Fuji: training. T. Wallenhorst: Olympus, Fujifilm: ESD training. M. Pioche: Olympus: ESD training and consultancy; COOK: EUS training.
-
References
- 1 Lambin T, Rivory J, Wallenhorst T. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: How to be more efficient?. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9: E1720-E1730
- 2 Nagata M. Usefulness of underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection in saline solution with a monopolar knife for colorectal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 1345-1353
- 3 Jacques J, Charissoux A, Bordillon P. et al. High proficiency of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection in Europe thanks to countertraction strategy using a double clip and rubber band. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7: E1166-E1174
Correspondence
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. Februar 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Lambin T, Rivory J, Wallenhorst T. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: How to be more efficient?. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9: E1720-E1730
- 2 Nagata M. Usefulness of underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection in saline solution with a monopolar knife for colorectal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 1345-1353
- 3 Jacques J, Charissoux A, Bordillon P. et al. High proficiency of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection in Europe thanks to countertraction strategy using a double clip and rubber band. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7: E1166-E1174



