Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2508-6778
Clinical Variables Associated with Lymphedema Surgery: Physiologic versus Excisional
Authors
Abstract
Background
As surgical interventions for lymphedema become increasingly available, it is important to understand characteristics of patients that undergo lymphedema surgery. The goal of this study was to define clinical variables of patients evaluated at a medical center who underwent lymphedema surgery to better inform which referred patients are surgical candidates.
Methods
A cross-sectional observational study was performed on patients referred to plastic surgery for lymphedema between January 2016 and June 2023. The operative group included patients who underwent lymphedema surgery, including physiologic surgery (PS) and excisional surgery (ES). The nonoperative group consisted of patients referred for lymphedema who did not undergo lymphatic surgery. Patient records were collected, and between-group comparisons were performed.
Results
A total of 285 total patients were identified (n = 66 operative, n = 219 nonoperative). The operative cohort had higher body mass index (BMI) than the nonoperative (33.5 vs. 31.2 kg/m2, p < 0.035) and was more likely to have undergone physical therapy/occupational therapy (68.2 vs. 53.4%, p = 0.005). Within the operative cohort (PS = 37, ES = 29), PS patients were more likely to be White (91.9 vs. 69.0%, p = 0.043) and have lower BMI (32 vs. 42.7 kg/m2, p = 0.007). PS patients were diagnosed for a longer period (8 vs. 3 years, p = 0.03) before seeing a plastic surgeon, more commonly had upper extremity lymphedema (43.2 vs. 13.8%, p = 0.016) and presented at an earlier lymphedema stage (stage 1 64.9 vs. 27.6%, p = 0.002). PS patients were more likely to have prior radiation (56.8 vs. 20.7%, p = 0.005), previous surgery (75.5 vs. 48.3%, p = 0.038), and prior lymphatic intervention (67.6 vs. 17.2%, p < 0.001) near the affected area.
Conclusion
Defining patient characteristics associated with surgical intervention for lymphedema can aid surgeons to increase the proportion of patients seen in clinic who are surgical candidates. Factors relating to oncological and surgical history in the affected area may suggest a patient is more likely to undergo PS.
Keywords
lymphedema - lymphedema surgery - lymphatic surgery center - physiologic surgery - excisional surgery* Co-First Authors.
Publication History
Received: 04 September 2024
Accepted: 23 December 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
30 December 2024
Article published online:
27 January 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Rockson SG, Rivera KK. Estimating the population burden of lymphedema. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008; 1131: 147-154
- 2 Grada AA, Phillips TJ. Lymphedema: pathophysiology and clinical manifestations. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017; 77 (06) 1009-1020
- 3 Sclafani LM, Baron RH. Sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary dissection: added morbidity of the arm, shoulder and chest wall after mastectomy and reconstruction. Cancer J 2008; 14 (04) 216-222
- 4 Donahue PMC, MacKenzie A, Filipovic A, Koelmeyer L. Advances in the prevention and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 200 (01) 1-14
- 5 Grada AA, Phillips TJ. Lymphedema: diagnostic workup and management. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017; 77 (06) 995-1006
- 6 Thompson B, Gaitatzis K, Janse de Jonge X, Blackwell R, Koelmeyer LA. Manual lymphatic drainage treatment for lymphedema: a systematic review of the literature. J Cancer Surviv 2021; 15 (02) 244-258
- 7 Schaverien MV, Coroneos CJ. Surgical treatment of lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (03) 738-758
- 8 de Sire A, Losco L, Lippi L. et al. Surgical treatment and rehabilitation strategies for upper and lower extremity lymphedema: a comprehensive review. Medicina (Kaunas) 2022; 58 (07) 954
- 9 Kung TA, Champaneria MC, Maki JH, Neligan PC. Current concepts in the surgical management of lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (04) 1003e-1013e
- 10 Forte AJ, Boczar D, Huayllani MT. et al. Use of magnetic resonance imaging lymphangiography for preoperative planning in lymphedema surgery: a systematic review. Microsurgery 2021; 41 (04) 384-390
- 11 Kuruvilla AS, Shroyer ALW, Li X. et al. Risk factors associated with adverse outcomes after ablative surgery for lymphedema. J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39 (03) 214-220
- 12 Executive Committee of the International Society of Lymphology. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2020 Consensus Document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology 2020; 53 (01) 3-19
- 13 Torres Lacomba M, Yuste Sánchez MJ, Zapico Goñi A. et al. Effectiveness of early physiotherapy to prevent lymphoedema after surgery for breast cancer: randomised, single blinded, clinical trial. BMJ 2010; 340: b5396
- 14 Paramanandam VS, Dylke E, Clark GM. et al. Prophylactic use of compression sleeves reduces the incidence of arm swelling in women at high risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40 (18) 2004-2012
- 15 Levenhagen K, Davies C, Perdomo M, Ryans K, Gilchrist L. Diagnosis of upper quadrant lymphedema secondary to cancer: clinical practice guideline from the Oncology Section of the American Physical Therapy Association. Phys Ther 2017; 97 (07) 729-745
- 16 Garza RM, Wong D, Chang DW. Optimizing outcomes in lymphedema reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 152 (06) 1131e-1142e
- 17 Sudduth CL, Greene AK. Lymphedema and obesity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2022; 12 (05) a041176
- 18 Viviano SL, Neligan PC. Updates on excisional procedures for lymphedema. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2022; 11 (08) 419-427
- 19 Admoun C, Mayrovitz HN. Coping mechanisms for lymphedema: an analysis of patient experiences. Cureus 2023; 15 (07) e41573
- 20 Lee BB. Phlebolymphedema: neglected outcome of combined venous and lymphatic insufficiency. Vasc Spec Int 2020; 36 (01) 1-3
- 21 Coughlin SS. Social determinants of breast cancer risk, stage, and survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 177 (03) 537-548
- 22 Doren EL, Park K, Olson J. Racial disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction following implementation of the affordable care act: a systematic review using a minority health and disparities research framework. Am J Surg 2023; 226 (01) 37-47
- 23 Shakir A, Coalson E, Beederman M, Froimson JR, Chang DW. Health disparities in patients seeking physiological surgical treatment for lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 151 (01) 217-224
- 24 Kim HB, Jung SS, Cho MJ. et al. Comparative analysis of preoperative high frequency color Doppler ultrasound versus MR lymphangiography versus ICG lymphography of lymphatic vessels in lymphovenous anastomosis. Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39 (02) 92-101
- 25 Varagur K, Shetty AS, Saoud K. et al. Association between bioimpedance spectroscopy and magnetic resonance lymphangiography in the diagnosis and assessment of lymphedema. J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40 (03) 177-185
- 26 Finkelstein ER, Ha M, Hanwright P. et al. A critical analysis of American insurance coverage for imaging and surgical treatment of lymphedema. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2022; 10 (06) 1367-1375
- 27 Lynn JV, Hespe GE, Akhter MF, David CM, Kung TA, Myers PL. Cross-sectional analysis of insurance coverage for lymphedema treatments in the United States. JAMA Surg 2023; 158 (09) 920-926
- 28 Carl HM, Walia G, Bello R. et al. Systematic review of the surgical treatment of extremity lymphedema. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (06) 412-425
