Minimally Invasive Radial–Ulnar and Tibial Fracture Management with Supracutaneous Locking Plates in Dogs and Cats

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to report the clinical, radiographic, and computed tomography results of supracutaneous locking plate (SLP) application in radial–ulnar and tibial fractures.

Study Design

In this clinical prospective study, cats and dogs with nonarticular radial, ulnar, and tibial fractures were managed with SLP. Surgical records, fracture healing, complications, and lameness were reviewed during scheduled rechecks. Fracture healing was assessed by clinical, radiographic, and tomographic reexaminations.

Results

All cases were reevaluated during clinical and radiological follow-up examinations for 13 weeks. Supracutaneous locking plates were used in 8 radial–ulnar and 25 tibial fractures. Closed reduction was used in 10 cases, and the minimally invasive osteosynthesis approach technique was used in 20 cases. The median fracture healing time was 50.5 days (range: 27–88). Callus area, the Hounsfield units value of callus tissue, and three-dimensional bone volume gradually increased during fracture healing (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Using SLPs to manage nonarticular diaphyseal radial–ulnar and tibial fractures in cats and dogs resulted in acceptable clinical outcomes. Cats and dogs tolerated SLPs well, and no complications related to structural integrity were encountered in most cases.

Keywords

supracutaneous locking plate - minimally invasive osteosynthesis - radius - tibia - computed tomography

Authors' Contribution

K.S.I. contributed to the conception, study design, acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation. He only drafted, revised, and approved the submitted manuscript and are publicly responsible for the relevant content.

Publication History

Received: 15 March 2024

Accepted: 04 December 2024

Article published online:
15 January 2025

• References

• 1 Sherman AH, Kraus KH, Watt D, Yuan L, Mochel JP. Linear external skeletal fixation applied in minimally invasive fashion for stabilization of nonarticular tibial fractures in dogs and cats. Vet Surg 2023; 52 (02) 249-256
• 2 Mascellino H, Maritato K, Barnhart M, Kass P. A retrospective short-term evaluation using a polyaxial plating system in 60 small animal fractures. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2023; 36 (02) 104-110
• 3 Hudson CC, Pozzi A, Lewis DD. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: applications and techniques in dogs and cats. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22 (03) 175-182
• 4 Marti R, Besselaar PP. Die Anwendung der AO-Platte als Fixateur externe. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1984; 122 (02) 225-232
• 5 Kerkhoffs GM, Kuipers MM, Marti RK, Van der Werken C. External fixation with standard AO-plates: technique, indications, and results in 31 cases. J Orthop Trauma 2003; 17 (01) 61-64
• 6 Apivatthakakul T, Sananpanich K. The locking compression plate as an external fixator for bone transport in the treatment of a large distal tibial defect: a case report. Injury 2007; 38 (11) 1318-1325
• 7 Kloen P. Supercutaneous plating: use of a locking compression plate as an external fixator. J Orthop Trauma 2009; 23 (01) 72-75
• 8 Janssen SJ, Kloen P. Supercutaneous locking compression plate in the treatment of infected non-union and open fracture of the leg. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 142 (11) 3201-3211
• 9 Kłos Z, Ratajska-Michalczak K, Sterna J. et al. Zespol stabilizer in the treatment of open fractures of the zeugopodium bones in dogs and a goat. In: Ram K, Nir K. eds. Advances in Materials Science and Implant Orthopedic Surgery. Dordrecht: Springer; 1995: 73-81
• 10 Nicetto T, Longo F. Supracutaneous plating using a locking plate for the treatment of a tibial fracture in a cat. Can Vet J 2017; 58 (06) 585-590
• 11 Nicetto T, Longo F. Supercutaneous plating for the treatment of traumatic injuries of the appendicular skeleton in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2019; 32 (02) 149-157
• 12 Mählmann K, Noguera Cender A, Ehrle A, Lischer CJ. Application of locking compression plates as type 1 external fixators to treat unilateral mandibular fractures in four equids and one dromedary. Vet Surg 2022; 51 (02) 341-352
• 13 Whelan DB, Bhandari M, McKee MD. et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variation in the assessment of the healing of tibial fractures after intramedullary fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84 (01) 15-18
• 14 Grigoryan M, Lynch JA, Fierlinger AL. et al. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of closed fracture healing using computed tomography and conventional radiography. Acad Radiol 2003; 10 (11) 1267-1273
• 15 Pozzi A, Risselada M, Winter MD. Assessment of fracture healing after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis or open reduction and internal fixation of coexisting radius and ulna fractures in dogs via ultrasonography and radiography. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2012; 241 (06) 744-753
• 16 Brinker WO, Hohn RB, Prieur WD. Manual of Internal Fixation in Small Animals. Springer: Berlin; 1984
• 17 Johnson KA. The hindlimb. In: Johnson KA. ed. Piermattei's Atlas of Surgical Approaches to the Bones and Joints of the Dog and Cat. 5 ed. China: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014: 428-432
• 18 Daniel K. Implants: description and application. . In: Johnson AL, Houlton JE, Vannini R. eds. AO Principles of Fracture Management in the Dog and Cat. Germany: Thieme; 2005: 26-51
• 19 Gautier E, Sommer C. Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury 2003; 34 (Suppl. 02) B63-B76
• 20 Hammer RR, Hammerby S, Lindholm B. Accuracy of radiologic assessment of tibial shaft fracture union in humans. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; (199) 233-238
• 21 Cronier P, Pietu G, Dujardin C, Bigorre N, Ducellier F, Gerard R. The concept of locking plates. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010; 96: 17-36
• 22 Zhang J, Ebraheim N, Li M. et al. External fixation using locking plate in distal tibial fracture: a finite element analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2015; 25 (06) 1099-1104
• 23 Ang BFH, Chen JY, Yew AKS. et al. Externalised locking compression plate as an alternative to the unilateral external fixator: a biomechanical comparative study of axial and torsional stiffness. Bone Joint Res 2017; 6 (04) 216-223
• 24 Lotsikas PJ, Radasch RM. A clinical evaluation of pancarpal arthrodesis in nine dogs using circular external skeletal fixation. Vet Surg 2006; 35 (05) 480-485
• 25 Pozzi A, Lewis DD, Scheuermann LM, Castelli E, Longo F. A review of minimally invasive fracture stabilization in dogs and cats. Vet Surg 2021; 50 (Suppl 1, Suppl 1): O5-O16
• 26 Garofolo S, Pozzi A. Effect of plating technique on periosteal vasculature of the radius in dogs: a cadaveric study. Vet Surg 2013; 42 (03) 255-261
• 27 Schmökel HG, Stein S, Radke H, Hurter K, Schawalder P. Treatment of tibial fractures with plates using minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis in dogs and cats. J Small Anim Pract 2007; 48 (03) 157-160
• 28 Johnson AL, Smith CW, Schaeffer DJ. Fragment reconstruction and bone plate fixation versus bridging plate fixation for treating highly comminuted femoral fractures in dogs: 35 cases (1987-1997). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998; 213 (08) 1157-1161
• 29 Bel J-C. Pitfalls and limits of locking plates. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2019; 105 (1S): S103-S109
• 30 Kääb MJ, Frenk A, Schmeling A, Schaser K, Schütz M, Haas NP. Locked internal fixator: sensitivity of screw/plate stability to the correct insertion angle of the screw. J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18 (08) 483-487
• 31 Hebert-Davies J, Laflamme G-Y, Rouleau D. et al. A biomechanical study comparing polyaxial locking screw mechanisms. Injury 2013; 44 (10) 1358-1362
• 32 Kaczmarek J, Bartkowiak T, Schuenemann R. et al. Mechanical performance of a polyaxial locking plate and the influence of screw angulation in a fracture gap model. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2020; 33 (01) 36-44
• 33 Stoffel K, Dieter U, Stachowiak G, Gächter A, Kuster MS. Biomechanical testing of the LCP–how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?. Injury 2003; 34 (Suppl. 02) B11-B19
• 34 Beever LJ, Kulendra ER, Meeson RL. Short and long-term outcome following surgical stabilization of tarsocrural instability in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2016; 29 (02) 142-148
• 35 Beever L, Giles K, Meeson R. Postoperative complications associated with external skeletal fixators in cats. J Feline Med Surg 2017; 19 (07) 727-736
• 36 Guiot LP, Guillou RP, Déjardin LM. Minimally invasive percutaneous medial plate-rod osteosynthesis for treatment of humeral shaft fractures in dog and cats: surgical technique and prospective evaluation. Vet Surg 2019; 48 (S1): O41-O51
• 37 Risselada M, Kramer M, de Rooster H, Taeymans O, Verleyen P, van Bree H. Ultrasonographic and radiographic assessment of uncomplicated secondary fracture healing of long bones in dogs and cats. Vet Surg 2005; 34 (02) 99-107
• 38 Nicholson JA, Tsang STJ, MacGillivray TJ, Perks F, Simpson AHRW. What is the role of ultrasound in fracture management? Diagnosis and therapeutic potential for fractures, delayed unions, and fracture-related infection. Bone Joint Res 2019; 8 (07) 304-312
• 39 Schwarzenberg P, Darwiche S, Yoon RS, Dailey HL. Imaging modalities to assess fracture healing. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2020; 18 (03) 169-179
• 40 Willems A, Iҫli C, Waarsing JH, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Meuffels DE. Bone union assessment with computed tomography (CT) and statistical associations with mechanical or histological testing: a systematic review of animal studies. Calcif Tissue Int 2022; 110 (02) 147-161
• 41 Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF, Tornetta III P, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH. A lack of consensus in the assessment of fracture healing among orthopaedic surgeons. J Orthop Trauma 2002; 16 (08) 562-566
• 42 Chanbour H, Chen JW, Vaughan WE. et al. Which bone mineral density measure offers a more reliable prediction of mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity surgery: Hounsfield units or DEXA scan?. World Neurosurg 2023; 178: e657-e665
• 43 Wehrle E, Tourolle Né Betts DC, Kuhn GA, Scheuren AC, Hofmann S, Müller R. Evaluation of longitudinal time-lapsed in vivo micro-CT for monitoring fracture healing in mouse femur defect models. Sci Rep 2019; 9 (01) 17445