RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/a-2490-3259
Changes in Liver Shear Wave Elastography of Preterm Infants during Hospitalization
Funding None.
Abstract
Objective
Liver evaluation is essential in preterm infants because of exposure to hepatotoxic drugs, the effects of parenteral nutrition, and their organ immaturity. The clinical significance of shear wave elastography (SWE) which measures tissue elasticity, is unclear in preterm infants. For SWE application to liver evaluation in preterm infants, we examined the postnatal course and factors associated with changes.
Study Design
We prospectively measured liver SWE values every other week in 37 preterm infants born at 23 to 35 weeks gestation and 12 term infants born after 36 weeks gestation.
Results
The median early postnatal liver SWE value was 1.22 (interquartile range, 1.19–1.26) m/s. The correlations of liver SWE values with gestational age and birth weight were r = −0.18 (p = 0.23) and r = −0.21 (p = 0.157), respectively. The median liver SWE values from birth to 36 to 38 postmenopausal weeks were 1.22 (1.17–1.24) m/s at <28 weeks gestation (n = 9), 1.21 (1.18–1.25) m/s at 28 to 29 weeks gestation (n = 11), 1.24 (1.21–1.28) m/s at 30 to 31 weeks gestation (n = 8), and 1.21 (1.20–1.24) m/s at ≥32 weeks gestation (n = 9). There was no change over time in any gestational age group (p = 0.158). The median liver SWE values were 1.22 (1.17–1.25) m/s (n = 10) and 1.22 (1.19–1.25) m/s (n = 27) for small- and appropriate-for-gestational-age infants, respectively (p = 0.93). The correlations of abnormally high serum concentrations of direct bilirubin (>1.0 mg/dL) and alanine aminotransferase (>12 IU/L) with liver SWE values were r = 0.37 (p = 0.041) and r = 0.21 (p = 0.35), respectively.
Conclusion
Liver SWE values may be useful for the evaluation of liver damage with cholestasis in preterm infants because they remain constant regardless of gestational age and birth weight and do not change over time or with a deviation of body size.
Key Points
-
Liver SWE was prospectively performed in preterm infants.
-
Liver SWE was constant until term regardless of gestational age or birth weight.
-
Liver SWE values of preterm infants ranged from 1.2 to 1.3 m/s.
-
For preterm infants, elevation of liver SWE values reflected cholestasis.
-
Liver SWE may become the new standard for liver evaluation in preterm infants.
Keywords
acoustic radiation force impulse imaging - preterm infant - cholestasis - liver stiffness - small for gestational ageUltrasonic elastography is a noninvasive technique used to measure tissue elasticity. It provides quantitative estimates of the elasticity of various tissues. Shear wave elastography (SWE), a specific technique within ultrasonic elastography, measures tissue elasticity according to the velocity of shear waves generated by ultrasonic push pulses.[1] [2] 2-D SWE is reportedly superior to other types of elastography for the evaluation of liver stiffness because it can theoretically obtain quantitative information on tissue elasticity in real time without being affected by target size, and it can simultaneously display color mapping of tissue stiffness to ensure the accuracy of the measurements.[3] Compared with liver biopsy, measurement of tissue elasticity by liver SWE is becoming popular in adult medicine as a noninvasive and more comprehensive method for evaluating fibrosis and stiffness of the whole liver.[3]
Preterm infants, particularly very low-birth-weight infants, often develop intestinal failure-related liver disease and parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease. These conditions are due to long-term enteral nutrition failure following intestinal diseases such as necrotizing enterocolitis.[4] [5] Preterm infants, especially those who are small for gestational age (SGA), have a high incidence of cholestasis due to low protein metabolism and utilization, which in turn increases the risk of parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease.[6] [7] [8] The only available quantitative method for evaluating liver damage and cholestasis in preterm infants is through blood testing, such as measurement of hepatobiliary enzymes. However, blood tests are highly invasive and thus difficult to repeat in the short term. B-mode ultrasound evaluation based on liver brightness is a noninvasive method but it is not quantitative.[9] Additionally, it may be inaccurate in very low-birth-weight infants with potential renal insufficiency because abnormal kidney luminescence can affect the quality of the control.[10] [11]
In the present study, therefore, we focused on liver SWE, which can be used to quantitatively evaluate liver stiffness. Liver stiffness is considered an effective prognostic factor for liver disease in adults.[12] Liver SWE, which can be used to noninvasively evaluate tissue elasticity, is thought to be suitable for evaluating liver stiffness over time in preterm infants with small body size and unstable general condition. However, only one report to date has described the use of liver SWE for evaluation of preterm infants,[13] and no standard values for preterm infants have been established. These factors make it difficult to utilize this method in clinical practice.
We performed repeated liver SWE in preterm infants from the early postnatal period to evaluate changes that occur with gestational age, birth weight, and the postnatal time course and examine the validity of liver SWE for evaluating liver stiffness in preterm infants.
Materials and Methods
Study Design and Study Population
We prospectively measured liver 2-D SWE in 37 preterm infants born before 36 weeks of gestation and 12 term infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of Kanagawa Children's Medical Center from April 2022 to March 2023. Infants with multiple malformations or chromosomal diseases were excluded. The preterm group was classified into infants with a gestational age of <28, 28–29, 30–31, and ≥32 weeks. All infants underwent measurement of the serum direct bilirubin and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentrations at the time of liver SWE.
2D Shear Wave Elastography
We performed liver 2-D SWE in the neonatal intensive care unit. Measurements were made by a neonatologist with 10 years of experience in neonatal imaging and 12 months of experience in 2-D liver SWE (T.K.) using a 5-1 MHz convex probe (EPIQ Elite ElastQ; Phillips, Amsterdam, Netherlands). After a 2-hour fast, the infants were placed in the supine or prone position without sedation, and measurements were taken through the right intercostal or subcostal arch approach. The upper edge of the shear wave box was placed 10 to 20 mm from the liver capsule in the right lobe of the liver, avoiding the shadows produced by the hepatic vessels and ribs, and a 10-mm circular region of interest was placed where the confidence map showed a confidence level of ≥80%. To ensure the reliability of the measured values, we adopted values as stable only when the median/interquartile range (IQR) of the measurements in the region of interest was <15%. Measurements were expressed in velocity (m/s), and the median value of the measurements within the region of interest was used for analysis. Five to 10 data values were obtained for each measurement, and the mean value was calculated. We started measurements within 2 weeks after birth and repeated them at 2- to 3-week intervals thereafter until discharge from the hospital or until 40 postmenopausal weeks.
We examined the relationship of the time course of liver SWE values with the weeks of gestation and birth weight. We also examined the relationship between the serum ALT and direct bilirubin concentrations and liver SWE values. We compared liver SWE values between the SGA group and the appropriate for gestational age (AGA) group. In accordance with the infant physical development research report by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan in 2001, SGA was defined as both height and weight at birth falling below the 10th percentile.
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as median and IQR. Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to identify relationships within and between different outcome measures. Differences in median values between two groups and among more than two groups were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test or Mann–Whitney U-test and the Friedman test or Kruskal–Wallis test, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 29.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), and p-values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Patients' Characteristics
We enrolled 37 (18 boys, 19 girls) preterm infants and 12 (7 boys, 5 girls) term infants. Preterm infants were measured four times (IQR, 3–5) starting at day 1 (IQR, 1–4), and term infants were measured at day 0 (IQR, 0–1).
No deaths occurred, but three infants developed severe gastrointestinal disorders requiring parenteral nutrition for >4 weeks ([Table 1]).
Values are expressed as either median (interquartile range) or n (%).
Correlation between Liver Shear Wave Elastography Values in Early Postnatal Period and Perinatal Data
There was no correlation between the liver SWE values within 2 weeks of birth and either the gestational age or birth weight ([Fig. 1A, B]).


Postnatal Time Course of liver Shear Wave Elastography Values
Liver SWE values were generally constant regardless of postmenopausal weeks in each gestational age group, and there were no differences between any of the gestational age groups at each postmenopausal week ([Table 2]).
Abbreviations: GA, gestational age; PMA, postmenopausal age.
The liver SWE values were generally constant in the SGA and AGA groups regardless of postmenopausal weeks, and there were no differences between the two groups at each postmenopausal week ([Table 3]).
Abbreviations: AGA, appropriate for gestational age; GA, gestational age; PMA, postmenopausal age; SGA, small for gestational age.
Correlation of Liver Shear Wave Elastography Values with Serum Alanine Aminotransferase and Direct Bilirubin Concentrations
Infants in whom the serum direct bilirubin concentration was >1.0 mg/dL, defined as cholestasis[14] (n = 30), showed a correlation between the direct bilirubin concentration and liver SWE values ([Fig. 2A]). Infants in whom the serum ALT concentration was >12 IU/L, which is the upper limit of normal for preterm infants[15] (n = 22), showed no correlation between the ALT concentration and liver SWE values ([Fig. 2B]).


In addition, elevated liver SWE levels were observed in three patients with cholestasis due to persistent dependence on parenteral nutrition ([Fig. 3A–C]).


Discussion
In our study, liver SWE values within 2 weeks of birth in preterm infants remained consistent irrespective of gestational age or birth weight. Although not associated with an increase in ALT alone, the liver SWE values increased in correlation with the direct bilirubin level, and there was no difference between the SGA and AGA groups.
The fetal liver is immature and depends on the metabolic activities of the maternal liver for many functions. It acquires its own functions during the neonatal period after birth at full term.[16] [17] At 5 to 6 months of gestation, the biliary system and other structures are established, but functional maturation is gradual.[18] Thus, the level of liver stiffness is assumed to remain constant in preterm infants. This assumption aligns with the time frame following the establishment of the biliary system and other structures at approximately 5 to 6 months of gestation.
The previously reported mean liver SWE values for healthy adults vary widely from 1.07 to 1.59 m/s,[19] [20] [21] whereas those for healthy children range between 1.10 and 1.16 m/s although there is an increase throughout childhood and adolescence.[22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] In our study, the median liver SWE value in the early postnatal period was 1.22 m/s (IQR, 1.19–1.26 m/s), which is slightly higher than that previously reported in children. This might be explained by the fact that the liver elasticity is higher in infants than in older children because of residual intrahepatic hematopoiesis, especially during preterm birth.[28]
SWE must be performed with immobile tissues, but infants are unable to hold their breath. Hence, there is concern about the influence of body movement on the measurements in infants, who are unable to cooperate. Previous studies showed no significant difference in measurements between free breathing and respiratory arrest in children.[29] [30] Therefore, we ensured the reliability of the measurements by adopting values as stable only when the median/IQR of the measurements in the region of interest was <15%. The number of measurements required for adults is considered to be 10, but it is difficult to obtain 10 stable measurements in infants. Because previous studies revealed no significant difference between 5 and 10 measurements in children,[29] [31] and recommended that the minimum acquisition number should be 3 to 5 for 2-D SWE.[32] we set the minimum number of measurements at 5 and terminated the examination when body movements made stable measurements difficult.
Alison et al[13] examined preterm infants and found higher liver SWE values in those with than without intrauterine growth restriction. In our study, no difference was found between the SGA and AGA groups. This likely occurred because 2 of 10 (20%) infants had direct hyperbilirubinemia in the SGA group, which was a lower proportion than 7 of 18 (39%) infants in the intrauterine growth restriction group reported by Alison et al.[13]
The main limitation of this study is the small sample size, particularly for infants born before 28 weeks gestation, which led to a lower number of infants with cholestasis. Future investigations should focus on larger cohorts, especially those including extremely preterm infants with cholestasis, to enhance the statistical power and generalizability of the findings. In addition, a liver biopsy could not be performed for research purposes because of its invasive nature and the large sample required for the measurement of liver fibrosis markers. Therefore, the evaluation of serum direct bilirubin and ALT, which are commonly used in routine evaluations, was performed as a substitute. Moreover, the ultrasonographers were not completely blind to the patient's clinical presentations. However, we consider this to be of little influence because we comprehensively measured all patients during the study period and the SWE values were measured semiautomatically.
Fortunately, none of the infants developed serious liver injury or liver failure during the observation period. However, this prevented us from assessing the efficacy of liver SWE in cases of fetal liver cirrhosis.
Conclusion
Liver SWE is stable and easy to perform even in preterm infants, and the measured values remain consistent until 40 postmenopausal weeks regardless of gestational age, birth weight, and deviation of body size. Liver SWE may be useful for repeated noninvasive evaluation of liver damage with cholestasis in preterm infants. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and provide more robust data.
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Acknowledgments
Authors thank Angela Morben, DVM, ELS, from Edanz ( https://jp.edanz.com/ac ) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Ethical Approval
The study was conducted in accordance with the principles contained in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional review board of Kanagawa Children's Medical Center (No. 144-1). All parents or guardians of the participating infants were informed of the use of the test data and the study purpose using an opt-out approach. There were no inquiries regarding the non-use of data during the posting of the opt-out option because the liver SWE images were obtained simultaneously with comprehensive ultrasound examinations of the brain, heart, and abdominal organs for biweekly health monitoring purposes.
-
References
- 1 Ferraioli G, Barr RG, Farrokh A. et al. How to perform shear wave elastography. Part I. Med Ultrason 2022; 24 (01) 95-106
- 2 Ferraioli G, Barr RG, Farrokh A. et al. How to perform shear wave elastography. Part II. Med Ultrason 2022; 24 (02) 196-210
- 3 Barr RG. Shear wave liver elastography. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43 (04) 800-807
- 4 Kelly DA. Preventing parenteral nutrition liver disease. Early Hum Dev 2010; 86 (11) 683-687
- 5 Lauriti G, Zani A, Aufieri R. et al. Incidence, prevention, and treatment of parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis and intestinal failure-associated liver disease in infants and children: a systematic review. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2014; 38 (01) 70-85
- 6 Baserga MC, Sola A. Intrauterine growth restriction impacts tolerance to total parenteral nutrition in extremely low birth weight infants. J Perinatol 2004; 24 (08) 476-481
- 7 Champion V, Carbajal R, Lozar J, Girard I, Mitanchez D. Risk factors for developing transient neonatal cholestasis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2012; 55 (05) 592-598
- 8 Robinson DT, Ehrenkranz RA. Parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis in small for gestational age infants. J Pediatr 2008; 152 (01) 59-62
- 9 Palmentieri B, de Sio I, La Mura V. et al. The role of bright liver echo pattern on ultrasound B-mode examination in the diagnosis of liver steatosis. Dig Liver Dis 2006; 38 (07) 485-489
- 10 Streitman K, Tóth A, Horváth I, Tálosi G. Renal injury in perinatal hypoxia: ultrasonography and changes in renal function. Eur J Pediatr 2001; 160 (08) 473-477
- 11 Makhoul IR, Soudack M, Smolkin T. et al. Neonatal transient renal failure with renal medullary hyperechogenicity: clinical and laboratory features. Pediatr Nephrol 2005; 20 (07) 904-909
- 12 Barr RG, Ferraioli G, Palmeri ML. et al. Elastography assessment of liver fibrosis: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Statement. Radiology 2015; 276 (03) 845-861
- 13 Alison M, Biran V, Tanase A. et al. Quantitative shear-wave elastography of the liver in preterm neonates with intra-uterine growth restriction. PLoS One 2015; 10 (11) e0143220
- 14 Feldman AG, Sokol RJ. Recent developments in diagnostics and treatment of neonatal cholestasis. Semin Pediatr Surg 2020; 29 (04) 150945
- 15 Ochiai M, Matsushita Y, Inoue H. et al; Kyushu University High-Risk Neonatal Clinical Research Network, Japan. Blood reference intervals for preterm low-birth-weight infants: a multicenter cohort study in Japan. PLoS One 2016; 11 (08) e0161439
- 16 Ring JA, Ghabrial H, Ching MS, Smallwood RA, Morgan DJ. Fetal hepatic drug elimination. Pharmacol Ther 1999; 84 (03) 429-445
- 17 Beath SV. Hepatic function and physiology in the newborn. Semin Neonatol 2003; 8 (05) 337-346
- 18 Grijalva J, Vakili K. Neonatal liver physiology. Semin Pediatr Surg 2013; 22 (04) 185-189
- 19 Arda K, Ciledag N, Aktas E, Aribas BK, Köse K. Quantitative assessment of normal soft-tissue elasticity using shear-wave ultrasound elastography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197 (03) 532-536
- 20 Popescu A, Sporea I, Sirli R. et al. The mean values of liver stiffness assessed by Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse elastography in normal subjects. Med Ultrason 2011; 13 (01) 33-37
- 21 Son CY, Kim SU, Han WK. et al. Normal liver elasticity values using acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: a prospective study in healthy living liver and kidney donors. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 27 (01) 130-136
- 22 Noruegas MJ, Matos H, Gonçalves I, Cipriano MA, Sanches C. Acoustic radiation force impulse-imaging in the assessment of liver fibrosis in children. Pediatr Radiol 2012; 42 (02) 201-204
- 23 Hanquinet S, Courvoisier D, Kanavaki A, Dhouib A, Anooshiravani M. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging-normal values of liver stiffness in healthy children. Pediatr Radiol 2013; 43 (05) 539-544
- 24 Matos H, Trindade A, Noruegas MJ. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in paediatric patients: normal liver values. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2014; 59 (06) 684-688
- 25 Lee MJ, Kim MJ, Han KH, Yoon CS. Age-related changes in liver, kidney, and spleen stiffness in healthy children measured with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82 (06) e290-e294
- 26 Mjelle AB, Mulabecirovic A, Havre RF. et al. Normal liver stiffness values in children: a comparison of three different elastography methods. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2019; 68 (05) 706-712
- 27 Mărginean CO, Meliţ LE, Ghiga DV, Săsăran MO. Reference values of normal liver stiffness in healthy children by two methods: 2D shear wave and transient elastography. Sci Rep 2020; 10 (01) 7213
- 28 Diaz-Miron J, Miller J, Vogel AM. Neonatal hematology. Semin Pediatr Surg 2013; 22 (04) 199-204
- 29 Shin HJ, Kim MJ, Kim HY, Roh YH, Lee MJ. Optimal acquisition number for hepatic shear wave velocity measurements in children. PLoS One 2016; 11 (12) e0168758
- 30 Jung C, Groth M, Petersen KU. et al. Hepatic shear wave elastography in children under free-breathing and breath-hold conditions. Eur Radiol 2017; 27 (12) 5337-5343
- 31 Galina P, Alexopoulou E, Zellos A. et al. Performance of two–dimensional ultrasound shear wave elastography: reference values of normal liver stiffness in children. Pediatr Radiol 2019; 49 (01) 91-98
- 32 Ferraioli G, Barr RG, Berzigotti A. et al. WFUMB Guideline/Guidance on Liver Multiparametric Ultrasound: Part 1. Update to 2018 Guidelines on Liver Ultrasound Elastography. Ultrasound Med Biol 2024; 50 (08) 1071-1087
Address for correspondence
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 15. Oktober 2024
Angenommen: 25. November 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
28. November 2024
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
28. Dezember 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Ferraioli G, Barr RG, Farrokh A. et al. How to perform shear wave elastography. Part I. Med Ultrason 2022; 24 (01) 95-106
- 2 Ferraioli G, Barr RG, Farrokh A. et al. How to perform shear wave elastography. Part II. Med Ultrason 2022; 24 (02) 196-210
- 3 Barr RG. Shear wave liver elastography. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43 (04) 800-807
- 4 Kelly DA. Preventing parenteral nutrition liver disease. Early Hum Dev 2010; 86 (11) 683-687
- 5 Lauriti G, Zani A, Aufieri R. et al. Incidence, prevention, and treatment of parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis and intestinal failure-associated liver disease in infants and children: a systematic review. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2014; 38 (01) 70-85
- 6 Baserga MC, Sola A. Intrauterine growth restriction impacts tolerance to total parenteral nutrition in extremely low birth weight infants. J Perinatol 2004; 24 (08) 476-481
- 7 Champion V, Carbajal R, Lozar J, Girard I, Mitanchez D. Risk factors for developing transient neonatal cholestasis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2012; 55 (05) 592-598
- 8 Robinson DT, Ehrenkranz RA. Parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis in small for gestational age infants. J Pediatr 2008; 152 (01) 59-62
- 9 Palmentieri B, de Sio I, La Mura V. et al. The role of bright liver echo pattern on ultrasound B-mode examination in the diagnosis of liver steatosis. Dig Liver Dis 2006; 38 (07) 485-489
- 10 Streitman K, Tóth A, Horváth I, Tálosi G. Renal injury in perinatal hypoxia: ultrasonography and changes in renal function. Eur J Pediatr 2001; 160 (08) 473-477
- 11 Makhoul IR, Soudack M, Smolkin T. et al. Neonatal transient renal failure with renal medullary hyperechogenicity: clinical and laboratory features. Pediatr Nephrol 2005; 20 (07) 904-909
- 12 Barr RG, Ferraioli G, Palmeri ML. et al. Elastography assessment of liver fibrosis: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Statement. Radiology 2015; 276 (03) 845-861
- 13 Alison M, Biran V, Tanase A. et al. Quantitative shear-wave elastography of the liver in preterm neonates with intra-uterine growth restriction. PLoS One 2015; 10 (11) e0143220
- 14 Feldman AG, Sokol RJ. Recent developments in diagnostics and treatment of neonatal cholestasis. Semin Pediatr Surg 2020; 29 (04) 150945
- 15 Ochiai M, Matsushita Y, Inoue H. et al; Kyushu University High-Risk Neonatal Clinical Research Network, Japan. Blood reference intervals for preterm low-birth-weight infants: a multicenter cohort study in Japan. PLoS One 2016; 11 (08) e0161439
- 16 Ring JA, Ghabrial H, Ching MS, Smallwood RA, Morgan DJ. Fetal hepatic drug elimination. Pharmacol Ther 1999; 84 (03) 429-445
- 17 Beath SV. Hepatic function and physiology in the newborn. Semin Neonatol 2003; 8 (05) 337-346
- 18 Grijalva J, Vakili K. Neonatal liver physiology. Semin Pediatr Surg 2013; 22 (04) 185-189
- 19 Arda K, Ciledag N, Aktas E, Aribas BK, Köse K. Quantitative assessment of normal soft-tissue elasticity using shear-wave ultrasound elastography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197 (03) 532-536
- 20 Popescu A, Sporea I, Sirli R. et al. The mean values of liver stiffness assessed by Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse elastography in normal subjects. Med Ultrason 2011; 13 (01) 33-37
- 21 Son CY, Kim SU, Han WK. et al. Normal liver elasticity values using acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: a prospective study in healthy living liver and kidney donors. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 27 (01) 130-136
- 22 Noruegas MJ, Matos H, Gonçalves I, Cipriano MA, Sanches C. Acoustic radiation force impulse-imaging in the assessment of liver fibrosis in children. Pediatr Radiol 2012; 42 (02) 201-204
- 23 Hanquinet S, Courvoisier D, Kanavaki A, Dhouib A, Anooshiravani M. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging-normal values of liver stiffness in healthy children. Pediatr Radiol 2013; 43 (05) 539-544
- 24 Matos H, Trindade A, Noruegas MJ. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in paediatric patients: normal liver values. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2014; 59 (06) 684-688
- 25 Lee MJ, Kim MJ, Han KH, Yoon CS. Age-related changes in liver, kidney, and spleen stiffness in healthy children measured with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82 (06) e290-e294
- 26 Mjelle AB, Mulabecirovic A, Havre RF. et al. Normal liver stiffness values in children: a comparison of three different elastography methods. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2019; 68 (05) 706-712
- 27 Mărginean CO, Meliţ LE, Ghiga DV, Săsăran MO. Reference values of normal liver stiffness in healthy children by two methods: 2D shear wave and transient elastography. Sci Rep 2020; 10 (01) 7213
- 28 Diaz-Miron J, Miller J, Vogel AM. Neonatal hematology. Semin Pediatr Surg 2013; 22 (04) 199-204
- 29 Shin HJ, Kim MJ, Kim HY, Roh YH, Lee MJ. Optimal acquisition number for hepatic shear wave velocity measurements in children. PLoS One 2016; 11 (12) e0168758
- 30 Jung C, Groth M, Petersen KU. et al. Hepatic shear wave elastography in children under free-breathing and breath-hold conditions. Eur Radiol 2017; 27 (12) 5337-5343
- 31 Galina P, Alexopoulou E, Zellos A. et al. Performance of two–dimensional ultrasound shear wave elastography: reference values of normal liver stiffness in children. Pediatr Radiol 2019; 49 (01) 91-98
- 32 Ferraioli G, Barr RG, Berzigotti A. et al. WFUMB Guideline/Guidance on Liver Multiparametric Ultrasound: Part 1. Update to 2018 Guidelines on Liver Ultrasound Elastography. Ultrasound Med Biol 2024; 50 (08) 1071-1087





