Hebamme 2024; 37(06): 32-37
DOI: 10.1055/a-2405-2121
CNE Schwerpunkt
Kontinuität neu denken

Hebammengeleitete und kontinuierliche Betreuung und das Quadruple Aim

Jonathan Dominguez Hernandez

Das „Quadruple Aim“ ist ein Konzept mit vier in Einklang zu bringenden Zielen. Wie gelingt es hebammengeleiteten Einrichtungen in Zeiten des Fachkräftemangels, eine persönliche und kontinuierliche Betreuung anzubieten, die den hohen Erwartungen der Eltern gerecht wird, Hebammen autonom und evidenzbasiert arbeiten lässt und die Ressourcen des Personals so einsetzt, dass sich Erschöpfung und Lücken im Team vermeiden lassen? Das kommentiert der Autor anhand eines fiktiven Umsetzungsbeispiels.



Publication History

Article published online:
16 December 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Carvajal B, Hancock A, Lewney K, Hagan K, Jamieson S, Cooke A. A global overview of midwives’ working conditions: A rapid review of literature on positive practice environment. Women and Birth 2024; 37: 15-50
  • 2 O’Farrell A, Chatzi A, Doody O. Midwives’ experiences using personal protective equipment during COVID-19: a scoping review. British Journal of Midwifery 2023; 31: 157-164
  • 3 Pich J, Roche M. Violence on the Job: The Experiences of Nurses and Midwives with Violence from Patients and Their Friends and Relatives. Healthcare (Basel) 2020; 8
  • 4 Feijen-de Jong EI, van der Voort-Pauw N, Nieuwschepen-Ensing EG, Kool L. Intentions to leave and actual turnover of community midwives in the Netherlands: A mixed method study exploring the reasons why. Women and Birth 2022; 35: e573-e582
  • 5 Schmiedhofer M, Derksen C, Keller FM, Dietl JE, Häussler F, Strametz R. et al. Barriers and Facilitators of Safe Communication in Obstetrics: Results from Qualitative Interviews with Physicians, Midwives and Nurses. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021; 18: 915
  • 6 Adeyemo OO, Morelli EE, Kennedy HP. How to Foster Effective Midwife – Obstetrician Collaboration on Labor and Birth Units: Qualitative Analysis of Experiences of Clinicians in the United States. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 2022; 67: 552-560
  • 7 Malesela JML. Midwives perceptions: Birth unit environment and the implementation of best intrapartum care practices. Women and Birth 2021; 34: 48-55
  • 8 Peterwerth NH, Halek M, Schäfers R. Intrapartum risk perception–A qualitative exploration of factors affecting the risk perception of midwives and obstetricians in the clinical setting. Midwifery 2022; 106: 103234
  • 9 Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The Triple Aim: Care, Health, And Cost. Health Affairs 2008; 27: 759-769
  • 10 Bachynsky N. Implications for policy: The Triple Aim, Quadruple Aim, and interprofessional collaboration. Nursing Forum 2020; 55: 54-64
  • 11 UNFPA, WHO, ICM. The State of the World's Midwifery 2021 [Available from https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/21-038-UNFPA-SoWMy2021-Report-ENv4302_0.pdf
  • 12 Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, Bastos MH, Campbell J, Channon AA, Cheung NF. et al. Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. The Lancet 2014; 384: 1129-1145
  • 13 Fikre R, Gubbels J, Teklesilasie W, Gerards S. Effectiveness of midwifery-led care on pregnancy outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23: 386
  • 14 Liu Y, Li T, Guo N, Jiang H, Li Y, Xu C. et al. Women's experience and satisfaction with midwife-led maternity care: a cross-sectional survey in China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21: 151
  • 15 Mortensen B, Diep LM, Lukasse M, Lieng M, Dwekat I, Elias D. et al. Women's satisfaction with midwife-led continuity of care: an observational study in Palestine. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e030324
  • 16 Ricchi A, Rossi F, Borgognoni P, Bassi MC, Artioli G, Foa C. et al. The midwifery-led care model: a continuity of care model in the birth path. Acta Biomed 2019; 90: 41-52
  • 17 Sandall J, Fernandez Turienzo C, Devane D, Soltani H, Gillespie P, Gates S. et al. Midwife continuity of care models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2024
  • 18 Ryan P, Revill P, Devane D, Normand C. An assessment of the cost-effectiveness of midwife-led care in the United Kingdom. Midwifery 2013; 29: 368-376
  • 19 Cignacco E, Schlenker A, Ammann-Fiechter S, Damke T, de Labrusse CC, Krahl A. et al. Advanced Midwifery Practice in Switzerland: Development and challenges. Eur J Midwifery 2024; 8
  • 20 Goemaes R, Beeckman D, Goossens J, Shawe J, Verhaeghe S, Van Hecke A. Advanced midwifery practice: An evolutionary concept analysis. Midwifery 2016; 42: 29-37
  • 21 Homer CSE, Friberg IK, Dias MAB, ten Hoope-Bender P, Sandall J, Speciale AM. et al. The projected effect of scaling up midwifery. The Lancet 2014; 384: 1146-1157
  • 22 Nove A, Friberg IK, de Bernis L, McConville F, Moran AC, Najjemba M. et al. Potential impact of midwives in preventing and reducing maternal and neonatal mortality and stillbirths: a Lives Saved Tool modelling study. The Lancet Global Health 2021; 9: e24-e32
  • 23 Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Annals of family medicine 2014; 12: 573-576
  • 24 Stein KV, Amelung VE, Miller R, Goodwin N. The Fourth Dimension of the Quadruple Aim: Empowering the Workforce to Become Partners in Health and Care. Int J Integr Care 2021; 21: 34
  • 25 Arnetz BB, Goetz CM, Arnetz JE, Sudan S, vanSchagen J, Piersma K. et al. Enhancing healthcare efficiency to achieve the Quadruple Aim: an exploratory study. BMC Res Notes 2020; 13: 362
  • 26 Squiers JJ, Lobdell KW, Fann JI, DiMaio JM. Physician Burnout: Are We Treating the Symptoms Instead of the Disease?. Ann Thorac Surg 2017; 104: 1117-1122