Boundaries in Kinematic Alignment: Why, When, and How

Abstract

The use of alternative alignments in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has recently been increasing in popularity: many of these alignments have been included in the broad spectrum of “kinematic alignment.” This alternative approach was recommended to increase patients' satisfaction since many studies based on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) showed that every fifth patient is not satisfied with the surgical outcome. In fact, the original kinematic alignment technique was designed as a “pure resurfacing” technique, maintaining the preoperative axes (flexion–extension and axial rotation) of the knee. In adjunct, many new classifications of the preoperative limb deformity have been proposed to include a large range of knee anatomies, few of them very atypical. Following those classifications, many surgeons aimed for a reproduction of unusual anatomies putting in jeopardy the survivorship of the implant according to the classical “dogma” of a poor knee kinematics and TKA biomechanics if the final hip–knee–ankle (HKA) axis was not kept within 5 degrees from neutral. This article reviews the literature supporting the choice of setting alignment boundaries in TKA when surgeons are interested in reproducing the constitutional knee anatomy of the patient within a safe range.

Keywords

boundaries - alignment - kinematic alignment - TKA - arthroplasty - phenotypes

Publication History

Received: 16 June 2024

Accepted: 19 August 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
20 August 2024

Article published online:
12 September 2024

• References

• 1 Oussedik S, Abdel MP, Victor J, Pagnano MW, Haddad FS. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2020; 102-B [phone]
• 2 Rivière C, Harman C, Boughton O, Cobb J. The kinematic alignment technique for total knee arthroplasty. In: Rivière C, Vendittoli PA. eds. Personalized Hip and Knee Joint Replacement. Cham: Springer; 2020: 175-195
• 3 Morcos MW, Uhuebor D, Vendittoli PA. Overview of the different personalized total knee arthroplasty with robotic assistance, how choosing?. Front Surg 2023; 10: 1120908
• 4 Nisar S, Palan J, Rivière C, Emerton M, Pandit H. Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev 2020; 5 (07) 380-390
• 5 Insall JN, Binazzi R, Soudry M, Mestriner LA. Total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; 192: 13-22
• 6 Hungerford DS, Kenna RV, Krackow KA. The porous-coated anatomic total knee. Orthop Clin North Am 1982; 13 (01) 103-122
• 7 Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (01) 57-63
• 8 Hancock CW, Winston MJ, Bach JM, Davidson BS, Eckhoff DG. Cylindrical axis, not epicondyles, approximates perpendicular to knee axes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (07) 2278-2283
• 9 Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MA. Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000; 82 (08) 1189-1195
• 10 Vigdorchik JM, Wakelin EA, Koenig JA. et al. Impact of component alignment and soft tissue release on 2-year outcomes in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37 (10) 2035-2040.e5
• 11 Sappey-Marinier E, Batailler C, Swan J. et al. Mechanical alignment for primary TKA may change both knee phenotype and joint line obliquity without influencing clinical outcomes: a study comparing restored and unrestored joint line obliquity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 30 (08) 2806-2814
• 12 Hirschmann MT, Moser LB, Amsler F, Behrend H, Leclerq V, Hess S. Functional knee phenotypes: a novel classification for phenotyping the coronal lower limb alignment based on the native alignment in young non-osteoarthritic patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (05) 1394-1402
• 13 Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (01) 45-53
• 14 Almaawi AM, Hutt JRB, Masse V, Lavigne M, Vendittoli PA. The impact of mechanical and restricted kinematic alignment on knee anatomy in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (07) 2133-2140
• 15 Howell SM, Hodapp EE, Kuznik K, Hull ML. In vivo adduction and reverse axial rotation (external) of the tibial component can be minimized. Orthopedics 2009; 32 (05) 319
• 16 Howell SM. Calipered kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty: an accurate technique that improves patient outcomes and implant survival. Orthopedics 2019; 42 (03) 126-135
• 17 Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it?. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (06) 39-43
• 18 Werner FW, Ayers DC, Maletsky LP, Rullkoetter PJ. The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements. J Biomech 2005; 38 (02) 349-355
• 19 Srivastava A, Lee GY, Steklov N, Colwell Jr CW, Ezzet KA, D'Lima DD. Effect of tibial component varus on wear in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2012; 19 (05) 560-563
• 20 Teeter MG, Naudie DD, McCalden RW. et al. Varus tibial alignment is associated with greater tibial baseplate migration at 10 years following total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (06) 1610-1617
• 21 Morgan SS, Bonshahi A, Pradhan N, Gregory A, Gambhir A, Porter ML. The influence of postoperative coronal alignment on revision surgery in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2008; 32 (05) 639-642
• 22 Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ. National Joint Registry for England and Wales, Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (07) 893-900
• 23 Vendittoli PA, Martinov S, Blakeney WG. Restricted kinematic alignment, the fundamentals, and clinical applications. Front Surg 2021; 8: 697020
• 24 Rivière C, Lazic S, Boughton O, Wiart Y, Vïllet L, Cobb J. Current concepts for aligning knee implants: patient-specific or systematic?. EFORT Open Rev 2018; 3 (01) 1-6
• 25 MacDessi SJ, Griffiths-Jones W, Harris IA, Bellemans J, Chen DB. Coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-B [phone]
• 26 Risitano S, Cacciola G, Sabatini L. et al. Restricted kinematic alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of radiographic and clinical data. J Orthop 2022; 33: 37-43
• 27 Novotny J, Gonzalez MH, Amirouche FM, Li YC. Geometric analysis of potential error in using femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16 (05) 641-647
• 28 Feeley I, Hegarty A, Hickey A, Glynn A. Impact of use of intramedullary and extramedullary guides on tibial component geometry in total knee replacements: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Knee Surg 2016; 29 (06) 487-496
• 29 Edelstein AI, Wakelin EA, Plaskos C, Suleiman LI. Laxity, balance, and alignment of a simulated kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today 2023; 23: 101204
• 30 Shatrov J, Battelier C, Sappey-Marinier E, Gunst S, Servien E, Lustig S. Functional alignment philosophy in total knee arthroplasty: rationale and technique for the varus morphotype using a CT based robotic platform and individualized planning. SICOT J 2022; 8: 11
• 31 Valpiana P, Ghirardelli S, Valtanen RS. et al. Biomechanical considerations for an easily-restricted robot-assisted kinematic alignment: a surgical technique note. Arthroplasty 2023; 5 (01) 29