J Neurol Surg B Skull Base
DOI: 10.1055/a-2297-3768
Original Article

Supraorbital Keyhole Approach: Opening of the Frontal Sinus and Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea

Anant Mehrotra
1   Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
1   Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Kamlesh Rangari
2   Neurosurgery, Trauma Care Centre and GMCH, Nagpur, India
,
Soumen Kanjilal
1   Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Pooja Tataskar
1   Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Pawan Kumar Verma
1   Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Kamlesh S. Bhaisora
1   Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Awadhesh Jaiswal
1   Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Raj Kumar
1   Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction: The supraorbital keyhole approach (SOKHA) has been a less invasive alternative for anterior and middle skull base lesions. We aimed to review our data and understand the advantages and limitations of the approach.

Methods: We analyzed our data and reviewed 89 consecutive cases who underwent the SOKHA. We included the clinico-radiological parameters, pathology, use of endoscope, complications, etc. for analysis.

Results: A total of 47 patients were of aneurysm with a total of 48 aneurysms (39 were ruptured and 9 were unruptured) and Acomm artery aneurysm was the most common site. Meningiomas were the second most common pathology encountered (n = 29). Tuberculum sella meningioma being the most common type of meningiomas operated through this approach. Gross total resection was done in all except two cases in which a small part of the tumor was left behind as the tumor was adhered to blood vessels. Among the remaining cases, craniopharyngiomas (n = 7), optic pathway gliomas (n = 2), hypothalamic hamartomas (n = 2), dermoid (n = 1), and arteriovenous malformation (n = 1) were the other pathologies operated upon. Eight patients had opening of the frontal sinus. Four patients had wound bulge and one patient had cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea. All these cases were managed conservatively.

Conclusion: SOKHA is an excellent approach for anterior cranial fossa lesions especially with properly chosen cases. Incidence of CSF leak in our study is 1.1% and majority can be managed by placement of lumbar drain. Intraoperative obliteration of the frontal sinus can reduce the risk of postoperative CSF leak. A large frontal sinus needs not be a contraindication for SOKHA.



Publication History

Received: 22 January 2024

Accepted: 22 March 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
01 April 2024

Article published online:
30 April 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References:

  • 1 Jane JA, Park TS, Pobereskin LH, Winn HR, Butler AB. The supraorbital approach: technical note. Neurosurgery 1982; 11 (04) 537-542
  • 2 Kaplan MJ, Jane JA, Park TS, Cantrell RW. Supraorbital rim approach to the anterior skull base. Laryngoscope 1984; 94 (09) 1137-1139
  • 3 Chalouhi N, Ali MS, Starke RM. et al. Cigarette smoke and inflammation: role in cerebral aneurysm formation and rupture. Mediators Inflamm 2012; 271582
  • 4 Warren WL, Grant GA. Transciliary orbitofrontozygomatic approach to lesions of the anterior cranial fossa. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (5, Suppl 2): 324-329 , discussion 329–330
  • 5 Reisch R, Perneczky A. Ten-year experience with the supraorbital subfrontal approach through an eyebrow skin incision. Neurosurgery 2005; 57 (04) 242-255 , discussion 242–255
  • 6 Czirják S, Szeifert GT. Surgical experience with frontolateral keyhole craniotomy through a superciliary skin incision. Neurosurgery 2001; 48 (01) 145-150
  • 7 van Lindert E, Perneczky A, Fries G, Pierangeli E. The supraorbital keyhole approach to supratentorial aneurysms: concept and technique. Surg Neurol 1998; 49 (05) 481-490
  • 8 Iacoangeli M, Di Rienzo A, Nocchi N. et al. Piezosurgery as a further technical adjunct in minimally invasive supraorbital keyhole approach and lateral orbitotomy. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2015; 76 (02) 112-118
  • 9 Eroglu U, Shah K, Bozkurt M. et al. Supraorbital keyhole approach: lessons learned from 106 operative cases. World Neurosurg 2019; 124: e667-e674
  • 10 Heros RC. The supraorbital “keyhole” approach. J Neurosurg 2011; 114 (03) 850-851 , discussion 851
  • 11 Paiva-Neto MA, Tella Jr OI. Supra-orbital keyhole removal of anterior fossa and parasellar meningiomas. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2010; 68 (03) 418-423
  • 12 Ormond DR, Hadjipanayis CG. The supraorbital keyhole craniotomy through an eyebrow incision: its origins and evolution. Minim Invasive Surg 2013; 2013: 296469
  • 13 Thaher F, Hopf N, Hickmann A-K. et al. Supraorbital keyhole approach to the skull base: evaluation of complications related to CSF fistulas and opened frontal sinus. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2015; 76 (06) 433-437
  • 14 Romani R, Lehecka M, Gaal E. et al. Lateral supraorbital approach applied to olfactory groove meningiomas: experience with 66 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 2009; 65 (01) 39-52 , discussion 52–53
  • 15 Fischer G, Stadie A, Reisch R. et al. The keyhole concept in aneurysm surgery: results of the past 20 years. Neurosurgery 2011; 68 (1, Suppl Operative): 45-51 , discussion 51