Monoclonal Gammopathy of Ocular Significance – A Case Report

Background

Plasma cell dyscrasias are a heterogeneous group of diseases, where clonal expansion of a plasma cell in the bone marrow leads to excessive production of an abnormal nonfunctional immunoglobulin or their parts [1]. In most cases, this monoclonal gammopathy is clinically asymptomatic, without malignancy criteria or the need for therapy. Based on the patientʼs symptoms, the burden of the monoclonal protein (also called M-protein or paraprotein), and the presence of organ damage, the disease may be classified into the following: monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), multiple myeloma (MM), Waldenström macroglobulinemia, chronic lymphocytic lymphoma, or other lymphoproliferative disorders [2]. MGUS is the most common plasma cell dyscrasia, affecting approximately 3% of the general population up to age 50, with an even higher prevalence in older individuals [3]. SMM is a premalignant disorder between MGUS and MM [2]. In contrast to MGUS, the degree of plasma cell infiltration in the bone marrow is higher (≥ 10%), which is usually reflected by a higher M-gradient in the serum [4]. Patients with MGUS and SMM are usually asymptomatic and do not display typical myeloma-associated end-organ damage such as anemia, hypercalcemia, lytic bone lesions, or renal failure [2]. Nevertheless, SMM carries a 10% per year risk of progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma over 5 years and a 65% cumulative risk 10 years after diagnosis [5].

Regardless of the diseaseʼs dignity and plasma clone size, all plasma cell dyscrasias can cause organ-related complications [6]. As early as 1934, Meesman first reported corneal stromal deposits in a patient with paraproteinemia, whereupon the term paraproteinemic keratopathy (PPK) was introduced [7]. However, because corneal involvement in systemic monoclonal gammopathies is rare and their clinical appearance may resemble other stromal pathologies, initial diagnosis remains challenging. We describe a case of SMM-associated keratopathy diagnosed in a university hospital in Switzerland.

Publication History

Received: 25 October 2023

Accepted: 13 November 2023

Article published online:
23 April 2024

• References

• 1 Boccadoro M, Pileri A. Plasma cell dyscrasias: classification, clinical and laboratory characteristics, and differential diagnosis. Baillieres Clin Haematol 1995; 8: 705-719
• 2 Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A. et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: e538-e548
• 3 Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV. et al. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1362-1369
• 4 Ojo AS, Ojukwu SG, Asemota J. et al. The effect of intervention versus watchful waiting on disease progression and overall survival in smoldering multiple myeloma: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022; 148: 897-911
• 5 Kyle RA, Remstein ED, Therneau TM. et al. Clinical course and prognosis of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 2582-2590
• 6 Singh RB, Singhal S, Sinha S. et al. Ocular complications of plasma cell dyscrasias. Eur J Ophthalmol 2023; 33: 1786-1800
• 7 Garibaldi DC, Gottsch J, de la Cruz Z. et al. Immunotactoid keratopathy: a clinicopathologic case report and a review of reports of corneal involvement in systemic paraproteinemias. Surv Ophthalmol 2005; 50: 61-80
• 8 Moshirfar M, West W, Ronquillo Y. Paraproteinemic Keratopathy. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023
• 9 Karakus S, Gottsch JD, Caturegli P. et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of “ocular” significance. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 2019; 15: 100471
• 10 Aragona P, Allegra A, Postorino EI. et al. Corneal Structural Changes in Nonneoplastic and Neoplastic Monoclonal Gammopathies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016; 57: 2657-2665
• 11 de Alba Campomanes AG, Rutar T, Crawford JB. et al. Crystal-storing histiocytosis and crystalline keratopathy caused by monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Cornea 2009; 28: 1081-1084
• 12 Lisch W, Saikia P, Pitz S. et al. Chameleon-like appearance of immunotactoid keratopathy. Cornea 2012; 31: 55-58
• 13 Lisch W, Wasielica-Poslednik J, Kivela T. et al. The Hematologic Definition of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance in Relation to Paraproteinemic Keratopathy (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2016; 114: T7
• 14 Graichen DF, Perez E, Jones DB. et al. kappa-Immunoglobulin corneal deposits associated with monoclonal gammopathy. Immunohistochemical and electron microscopic findings. Ger J Ophthalmol 1994; 3: 54-57
• 15 Soh YQ, Kocaba V, Weiss JS. et al. Corneal dystrophies. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2020; 6: 46
• 16 Berenson JR, Anderson KC, Audell RA. et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a consensus statement. Br J Haematol 2010; 150: 28-38
• 17 Dispenzieri A. Monoclonal gammopathies of clinical significance. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2020; 2020: 380-388
• 18 Bourne WM, Kyle RA, Brubaker RF. et al. Incidence of corneal crystals in the monoclonal gammopathies. Am J Ophthalmol 1989; 107: 192-193
• 19 Al Hariri M, Munder M, Lisch W. et al. Prevalence of corneal findings and their interrelation with hematological findings in monoclonal gammopathy. PLoS One 2022; 17: 0276048