Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2180-6817
Passing of the baton
Article in several languages: deutsch | EnglishAuthors
After a total of 4 years as an associate editor and 24 years as an editor at Ultraschall in der Medizin/European Journal of Ultrasound (UIM/EJU), the time has come for a change.
It was the year 1994 when Prof. Dr. Emil Reinold, one of the three founding editors of Ultraschall in der Medizin, approached Karlheinz Seitz and me at the three-country meeting in Basel, Switzerland and asked us if we would like to get involved as associate editors for the journal. Since we had been intensively involved in ultrasound for a long time, we gladly accepted the offer. Four years later, in 1999, we both became editors, together with Kurt Jäger from Basel, Switzerland and Gerd Judmaier from Innsbruck, Austria.
Since then, ultrasound diagnostics has developed enormously in many areas.
In the field of gynecology and obstetrics, technical developments in ultrasound devices, e. g., the high image quality of 2D sonography, the automation of Doppler/color Doppler sonography, and the significant development of 3D/4D sonography, should be mentioned here [1].
In prenatal diagnostics, the widespread use of first-trimester screening [2] [3] led to a shift of prenatal diagnosis from the second trimester to the first, which meant that a large number of malformations could be diagnosed much earlier [4]. 3D sonography [5] [6] [7] made it possible for the first time to visualize fetal surfaces and to acquire X-ray-like images of the fetal skeleton [8], as well as to precisely examine certain planes, e. g., the fetal profile [9], or standard biometric planes [10]. 4D ultrasonography provided insight into fetal movements while simultaneously imaging the fetal surface [11] as well as allowing assessment of fetal heart movements [12].
In the field of gynecology, transvaginal ultrasound has made a valuable contribution to the diagnosis of tumors in the female pelvis [13] [14]. Transvaginal 3D sonography enables the spatial imaging of inner walls in cystic tumors and tumor vascularization [6] [15]. It can also be used to specifically detect uterine abnormalities [16] or dislocations of intrauterine devices [17]. With translabial/transperineal 3D sonography, the female pelvic floor and corresponding pelvic floor defects can be easily detected [18] [19] [20].
In breast sonography, 3D imaging allows tumors to be displayed in coronal planes, which makes it possible to differentiate between benign and malignant findings in many cases [21] [22]. Significant progress has also been made in the field of elastography in the female breast [23] [24].
All these developments have been able to be continuously demonstrated by corresponding publications in UIM/EJU. Articles on the safety of ultrasound in the unborn child have also been given appropriate attention [25] [26]. In addition, the journal also published CME articles, which are important for education and training. However, not only the publication of high-quality original papers but also the transition from a purely German-language to an English-language journal was decisive for the journal’s success. Consequently, a far-reaching international audience was able to be reached and a significant increase of the impact factor was observed.
After all these years of editing, I am grateful that I was able to personally experience the many developments in the field of ultrasound diagnostics both in my daily routine and as an editor of UIM/EJU. Some things will certainly change in the future. For example, sonographic evaluation of fetal malformations will increasingly be supplemented by genetic examinations, such as trio-exome sequencing [27] [28], in order to better assess the prognosis of anomalies.
I would like to take this opportunity to express my gratitude to the Thieme team of UIM/EJU for all the years of trust and good collaboration, especially Mr. Volker Niem, Mr. Siegfried Steindl (MD), Ms. Angelika Höbrink and Ms. Alexandra Heise. I would also like to thank all my co-editors for the years of harmonious teamwork.
I am pleased that we have found an excellent successor for me as the new editor. Prof. Dr. Philipp Klaritsch from the Department of Obstetrics at the University Womenʼs Hospital Graz will share responsibility for the field of gynecological and obstetric ultrasound in the future.
Finally, I wish the entire editorial team of the journal UIM/EJU continued enthusiasm and future success.
Eberhard Merz
Conflict of interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
-
Literatur
- 1 Merz E, Evans DH, Dong Y. et al. History of ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology from 1971 to 2021 on occasion of the 50 years anniversary of EFSUMB. Med Ultrason 2023; 25 (02) 175-188
- 2 Merz E, Thode C, Hackelöer BJ. et al. The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) Germany after 20 Years – Quality Assurance of Ultrasound Examinations during First Trimester Screening. Ultraschall in Med 43 (02) 115-119
- 3 Bilardo CM, Chaoui R, Hyett JA. International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of 11-14-week ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023; 61 (01) 127-143
- 4 Merz E, Eiben B, Thode C. et al. The role of ultrasound in first-trimester screening after the introduction of NIPT as a service of public health insurance – a consensus statement of the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) Germany. Ultraschall in Med 2023;
- 5 Merz E, Abramovicz J, Baba K. et al. 3D imaging of the fetal face – recommendations from the International 3D Focus Group. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33 (02) 175-182
- 6 Merz E, Chaoui R. 30-year anniversary of ultrasound: Clinical use of 3D ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology (1989-2019). Ultraschall in Med 2019; 40 (03) 288-291
- 7 Merz E, Pashaj S. Three-dimensional/Four-dimensional Ultrasound: The Key for the Precise Assessment of Fetal Malformations. Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2023;
- 8 Benoit B. The value of three-dimensional ultrasonography in the screening of the fetal skeleton. Childs Nerv Syst 2003; 19 (07) 403-409
- 9 Pashaj S, Merz E. 3-Dimensional Ultrasound: How can the Fetal Corpus Callosum Be Demonstrated Correctly?. Ultraschall in Med 2021; 42 (03) 278-284
- 10 Merz E, Pashaj S, Wellek S. Normal Fetal Growth Profile at 10-41 Weeks of Gestation – An Update Based on 10225 Normal Singleton Pregnancies and Measurement of the Fetal Parameters Using 3D Ultrasound. Ultraschall in Med 2023; 44 (02) 179-187
- 11 Kurjak A, Spalldi Barišić L, Stanojević M. et al. Multi-center results on the clinical use of KANET. J Perinat Med 2019; 47 (09) 897-909
- 12 Chaoui R, Heling KS. Grundlagen der 3D- und 4D-Echokardiographie beim Fetus unter Nutzung der Spatio-Temporal-Image-Correlation(STIC)-Software [Basics of 3D and 4D fetal echocardiography using spatial and temporal image correlation (STIC) software]. Ultraschall in Med 2006; 27 (04) 340-346
- 13 Grab D, Merz E, Eichhorn KH. et al. Basic Gynecologic Ultrasound Examination (Level I): DEGUM, ÖGUM, and SGUM Recommendations. Ultraschall in Med 2023; 44 (02) 151-161
- 14 Hoopmann M, Tutschek B, Merz E. et al. Quality Requirements for gynecological ultrasound examinations of DEGUM level II – Recommendations of the Sections/Working Groups Gynecology and Obstetrics of DEGUM, ÖGUM and SGUM. Ultraschall in Med 2022; 43 (02) 146-158
- 15 Alcázar JL, Jurado M. Three-dimensional ultrasound for assessing women with gynecological cancer: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 120 (03) 340-346
- 16 Imboden S, Müller M, Raio L. et al. Clinical significance of 3D ultrasound compared to MRI in uterine malformations. Ultraschall in Med 2014; 35 (05) 440-444
- 17 Benacerraf BR, Shipp TD, Bromley B. Three-dimensional ultrasound detection of abnormally located intrauterine contraceptive devices which are a source of pelvic pain and abnormal bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34 (01) 110-115
- 18 Dietz HP. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part II: three-dimensional or volume imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23 (06) 615-625
- 19 Albrich S, Laterza RM, Merinsky A. et al. Die Messung des infrapubischen Winkels in der 3-D-Perineal-Sonografie und seine Beziehung zu geburtshilflichen Parametern [Measurement of the infrapubic angle using 3D perineal ultrasound and its relationship to obstetrical parameters]. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33 (07) E95-E100
- 20 Zhong C, Hu P, Ran S. et al. Association Between Urinary Stress Incontinence and Levator Avulsion Detected by 3D Transperineal Ultrasound. Ultraschall in Med 2023; 44 (01) e39-e46
- 21 Weismann C, Hergan K. Aktueller Stand der 3D-/4D-Volumensonografie der Mamma [Current status of 3D/4D volume ultrasound of the breast]. Ultraschall in Med 2007; 28 (03) 273-282
- 22 Vogel-Minea CM, Bader W, Blohmer JU. et al. Best Practice Guideline – DEGUM Recommendations on Breast Ultrasound. Ultraschall in Med 2023; 44: 520-536
- 23 Cantisani V, David E, Barr RG. et al. US-Elastography for Breast Lesion Characterization: Prospective Comparison of US BIRADS, Strain Elastography and Shear wave Elastography. Ultraschall in Med 2021; 42 (05) 533-540
- 24 Golatta M, Pfob A, Büsch C. et al. The Potential of Shear Wave Elastography to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies in Breast Cancer Diagnosis: An International, Diagnostic, Multicenter Trial. Ultraschall in Med 2023; 44 (02) 162-168
- 25 Dudwiesus H, Merz E. How Safe Is the Use of Ultrasound in Prenatal Medicine? Facts and Contradictions. Part 1 – Ultrasound-Induced Bioeffects. Ultraschall in Med 2020; 41 (05) 476-498
- 26 Dudwiesus H, Merz E. How safe is it to use ultrasound in prenatal medicine? Facts and contradictions – Part 2 – Laboratory experiments regarding non-thermal effects and epidemiological studies. Ultraschall in Med 2021; 42 (05) 460-502
- 27 Dufke A, Hoopmann M, Waldmüller S. et al. A single center experience of prenatal parent-fetus trio exome sequencing for pregnancies with congenital anomalies. Prenat Diagn 2022; 42 (07) 901-910
- 28 Miceikaite I, Fagerberg C, Brasch-Andersen C. et al. Comprehensive prenatal diagnostics: Exome versus genome sequencing. Prenat Diagn 2023; 43 (09) 1132-1141
Korrespondenzadresse
Publication History
Article published online:
04 December 2023
© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
Literatur
- 1 Merz E, Evans DH, Dong Y. et al. History of ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology from 1971 to 2021 on occasion of the 50 years anniversary of EFSUMB. Med Ultrason 2023; 25 (02) 175-188
- 2 Merz E, Thode C, Hackelöer BJ. et al. The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) Germany after 20 Years – Quality Assurance of Ultrasound Examinations during First Trimester Screening. Ultraschall in Med 43 (02) 115-119
- 3 Bilardo CM, Chaoui R, Hyett JA. International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of 11-14-week ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023; 61 (01) 127-143
- 4 Merz E, Eiben B, Thode C. et al. The role of ultrasound in first-trimester screening after the introduction of NIPT as a service of public health insurance – a consensus statement of the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) Germany. Ultraschall in Med 2023;
- 5 Merz E, Abramovicz J, Baba K. et al. 3D imaging of the fetal face – recommendations from the International 3D Focus Group. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33 (02) 175-182
- 6 Merz E, Chaoui R. 30-year anniversary of ultrasound: Clinical use of 3D ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology (1989-2019). Ultraschall in Med 2019; 40 (03) 288-291
- 7 Merz E, Pashaj S. Three-dimensional/Four-dimensional Ultrasound: The Key for the Precise Assessment of Fetal Malformations. Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2023;
- 8 Benoit B. The value of three-dimensional ultrasonography in the screening of the fetal skeleton. Childs Nerv Syst 2003; 19 (07) 403-409
- 9 Pashaj S, Merz E. 3-Dimensional Ultrasound: How can the Fetal Corpus Callosum Be Demonstrated Correctly?. Ultraschall in Med 2021; 42 (03) 278-284
- 10 Merz E, Pashaj S, Wellek S. Normal Fetal Growth Profile at 10-41 Weeks of Gestation – An Update Based on 10225 Normal Singleton Pregnancies and Measurement of the Fetal Parameters Using 3D Ultrasound. Ultraschall in Med 2023; 44 (02) 179-187
- 11 Kurjak A, Spalldi Barišić L, Stanojević M. et al. Multi-center results on the clinical use of KANET. J Perinat Med 2019; 47 (09) 897-909
- 12 Chaoui R, Heling KS. Grundlagen der 3D- und 4D-Echokardiographie beim Fetus unter Nutzung der Spatio-Temporal-Image-Correlation(STIC)-Software [Basics of 3D and 4D fetal echocardiography using spatial and temporal image correlation (STIC) software]. Ultraschall in Med 2006; 27 (04) 340-346
- 13 Grab D, Merz E, Eichhorn KH. et al. Basic Gynecologic Ultrasound Examination (Level I): DEGUM, ÖGUM, and SGUM Recommendations. Ultraschall in Med 2023; 44 (02) 151-161
- 14 Hoopmann M, Tutschek B, Merz E. et al. Quality Requirements for gynecological ultrasound examinations of DEGUM level II – Recommendations of the Sections/Working Groups Gynecology and Obstetrics of DEGUM, ÖGUM and SGUM. Ultraschall in Med 2022; 43 (02) 146-158
- 15 Alcázar JL, Jurado M. Three-dimensional ultrasound for assessing women with gynecological cancer: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 120 (03) 340-346
- 16 Imboden S, Müller M, Raio L. et al. Clinical significance of 3D ultrasound compared to MRI in uterine malformations. Ultraschall in Med 2014; 35 (05) 440-444
- 17 Benacerraf BR, Shipp TD, Bromley B. Three-dimensional ultrasound detection of abnormally located intrauterine contraceptive devices which are a source of pelvic pain and abnormal bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34 (01) 110-115
- 18 Dietz HP. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part II: three-dimensional or volume imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23 (06) 615-625
- 19 Albrich S, Laterza RM, Merinsky A. et al. Die Messung des infrapubischen Winkels in der 3-D-Perineal-Sonografie und seine Beziehung zu geburtshilflichen Parametern [Measurement of the infrapubic angle using 3D perineal ultrasound and its relationship to obstetrical parameters]. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33 (07) E95-E100
- 20 Zhong C, Hu P, Ran S. et al. Association Between Urinary Stress Incontinence and Levator Avulsion Detected by 3D Transperineal Ultrasound. Ultraschall in Med 2023; 44 (01) e39-e46
- 21 Weismann C, Hergan K. Aktueller Stand der 3D-/4D-Volumensonografie der Mamma [Current status of 3D/4D volume ultrasound of the breast]. Ultraschall in Med 2007; 28 (03) 273-282
- 22 Vogel-Minea CM, Bader W, Blohmer JU. et al. Best Practice Guideline – DEGUM Recommendations on Breast Ultrasound. Ultraschall in Med 2023; 44: 520-536
- 23 Cantisani V, David E, Barr RG. et al. US-Elastography for Breast Lesion Characterization: Prospective Comparison of US BIRADS, Strain Elastography and Shear wave Elastography. Ultraschall in Med 2021; 42 (05) 533-540
- 24 Golatta M, Pfob A, Büsch C. et al. The Potential of Shear Wave Elastography to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies in Breast Cancer Diagnosis: An International, Diagnostic, Multicenter Trial. Ultraschall in Med 2023; 44 (02) 162-168
- 25 Dudwiesus H, Merz E. How Safe Is the Use of Ultrasound in Prenatal Medicine? Facts and Contradictions. Part 1 – Ultrasound-Induced Bioeffects. Ultraschall in Med 2020; 41 (05) 476-498
- 26 Dudwiesus H, Merz E. How safe is it to use ultrasound in prenatal medicine? Facts and contradictions – Part 2 – Laboratory experiments regarding non-thermal effects and epidemiological studies. Ultraschall in Med 2021; 42 (05) 460-502
- 27 Dufke A, Hoopmann M, Waldmüller S. et al. A single center experience of prenatal parent-fetus trio exome sequencing for pregnancies with congenital anomalies. Prenat Diagn 2022; 42 (07) 901-910
- 28 Miceikaite I, Fagerberg C, Brasch-Andersen C. et al. Comprehensive prenatal diagnostics: Exome versus genome sequencing. Prenat Diagn 2023; 43 (09) 1132-1141





