Persönlichkeitsstörungen und HiTOP-Diagnostik

Der Beitrag stellt die Hierarchische Taxonomie der Psychopathologie (HiTOP) vor, vergleicht sie mit bestehenden diagnostischen Systemen auf der Grundlage des medizinischen Modells und erklärt, wie Persönlichkeitsstörungen aus einer HiTOP-Perspektive verstanden werden können.

Publication History

Article published online:
27 May 2024

• Literatur

• 1 Kotov R, Krueger RF, Watson D. et al. The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. J Abnorm Psych 2017; 126: 454-477
• 2 American Psychiatric Association-(APA). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013
• 3 World Health Organization (WHO). International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. 11th. WHO; 2021
• 4 Engstrom EJ, Kendler KS. Emil Kraepelin: Icon and reality. Am J Psy 2015; 172: 1190-1196
• 5 Feighner JP, Robins E, Guze SB. et al. Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Arch Gener Psy 1972; 26: 57-63
• 6 Krueger RF, Kotov R, Watson D. et al. Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology. World Psy 2018; 17: 282-293
• 7 Haslam N, Holland E, Kuppens P. Categories versus dimensions in personality and psychopathology: A quantitative review of taxometric research. Psychol Med 2012; 42: 903-920
• 8 Widiger TA, Sellbom M, Chmielewski M. et al. Personality in a hierarchical model of psychopathology. Clin Psychol Sci 2019; 7: 77-92
• 9 Ringwald WR, Forbes MK, Wright AG. Meta-analysis of structural evidence for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) model. Psychol Med 2023; 53: 533-546
• 10 Markon KE, Krueger RF, Watson D. Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. J Pers Social Psychol 2005; 88: 139-157
• 11 Giangrande EJ, Weber RS, Turkheimer E. What do we know about the genetic architecture of psychopathology?. Ann Rev Clin Psychol 2022; 18: 19-42
• 12 Natoli AP. The DSM’s reconnection to psychoanalytic theory through the alternative model for personality disorders. J Am Psychoanal Ass 2019; 67: 1023-1045
• 13 Williams JBW. The multiaxial system of DSM–III: Where did it come from and where should it go?. Arch Gen Psy 1985; 42: 175-180
• 14 Hopwood CJ, Wright AG, Bleidorn W. Person-environment transactions differentiate personality and psychopathology. Nat Rev Psychol 2022; 1: 55-63
• 15 Skodol AE. Personality disorders in DSM-5. Ann Rev Clin Psychol 2012; 8: 317-344
• 16 Mulder RT. ICD-11 personality disorders: Utility and implications of the new model. Front Psy 2021; 12: 655548
• 17 Krueger RF, Hopwood CJ, Wright AG. et al. DSM-5 and the path toward empirically based and clinically useful conceptualization of personality and psychopathology. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2014; 21: 245-261
• 18 Morey LC, McCredie MN, Bender DS. et al. Criterion A: Level of personality functioning in the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders. Pers Dis Theor Res Treatm 2022; 13: 305-315
• 19 Wright AGC, Ringwald WR, Hopwood C. et al. It’s time to replace the personality disorders with the interpersonal disorders. Am Psychologist 2022; 77: 1085-1099