Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2109-0778
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer, using a disposable endoscope
The environment in reusable endoscopes is conducive to bacterial growth [1] [2] because of difficult-to-clean areas, deterioration with reprocessing, and surface abrasion. Hence, the risk of cross-infection has been reported [3]. Single-use endoscopes can solve these problems. Diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy using a novel sterile single-use disposable endoscope (Ambu aScope Gastro; Ambu, Ballerup, Denmark) has been reported in recent years ([Fig. 1]) [4].


Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely performed for early-stage gastric cancer regardless of tumor size, morphology, and location. ESD is minimally invasive and can achieve high en bloc and complete resection rates [5]. Here, we present a case of early gastric cancer resected by means of ESD using the abovementioned single-use disposable endoscope ([Video 1]).
Video 1 Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of an early gastric cancer by means of a single-use disposable endoscope.
Quality:
A 70-year-old woman with early gastric cancer was referred for ESD. The tumor (5 mm, 0-IIc) was located at the anterior wall of the greater curvature of the middle body. The tumor was well-demarcated by magnified narrow band imaging (NBI) ([Fig. 2]). A DualKnife J 2.0 mm (Olympus Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) with magnified NBI via a GIF-XZ1200 (Olympus) was used for marking. The endoscope was changed for the single-use disposable endoscope when marking had been done, and the ESD procedure was performed using the single-use scope. Imaging and maneuverability were adequate for performing mucosal incision and submucosal dissection ([Fig. 3 a]). The clip-and-line traction method was successfully applied by means of the 2.8-mm working channel ([Fig. 3 b]). In addition, the bleeding point could be identified using the waterjet function of the device ([Video 1]). Hence, the tumor was completely resected ([Fig. 3 c]) without any major complications. The pathological finding was adenocarcinoma of fundic gland type, SM1, Ly0, V0, HM0, and VM0, with curative resection.




Our case demonstrates a successful gastric ESD with a single-use disposable scope. This device could be considered as an alternative to reusable endoscopes if an appropriate case is selected.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AO_2AC
E-Videos is an open access online section of the journal Endoscopy, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high-quality video and are published with a Creative Commons CC-BY license. Endoscopy E-Videos qualify for HINARI discounts and waivers and eligibility is automatically checked during the submission process. We grant 100% waivers to articles whose corresponding authors are based in Group A countries and 50% waivers to those who are based in Group B countries as classified by Research4Life (see: https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/).
This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos
#
Competing interests
Ambu K. K., the manufacturer of Ambu aScope Gastro that was used in this study, provided the product sample at no cost.
-
References
- 1 Decristoforo P, Kaltseis J, Fritz A. et al. High-quality endoscope reprocessing decreases endoscope contamination. Clin Microbiol Infect 2018; 24: 1101.e1-1101.e6
- 2 Saliou P, Le Bars H, Payan C. et al. Measures to improve microbial quality surveillance of gastrointestinal endoscopes. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 704-710
- 3 Ribeiro MM, de Oliveira AC. Analysis of the air/water channels of gastrointestinal endoscopies as a risk factor for the transmission of microorganisms among patients. Am J Infect Control 2012; 40: 913-916
- 4 Lagström R, Stigaard T, Knuhtsen S. et al. sDiagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed using a novel sterile single-use disposable endoscope. Endoscopy 2022; 54: E1034-E1035
- 5 Ono H, Yao K, Fujishiro M. et al. Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer. Dig Endosc 2016; 28: 3-15
Corresponding author
Publication History
Article published online:
13 July 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Decristoforo P, Kaltseis J, Fritz A. et al. High-quality endoscope reprocessing decreases endoscope contamination. Clin Microbiol Infect 2018; 24: 1101.e1-1101.e6
- 2 Saliou P, Le Bars H, Payan C. et al. Measures to improve microbial quality surveillance of gastrointestinal endoscopes. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 704-710
- 3 Ribeiro MM, de Oliveira AC. Analysis of the air/water channels of gastrointestinal endoscopies as a risk factor for the transmission of microorganisms among patients. Am J Infect Control 2012; 40: 913-916
- 4 Lagström R, Stigaard T, Knuhtsen S. et al. sDiagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed using a novel sterile single-use disposable endoscope. Endoscopy 2022; 54: E1034-E1035
- 5 Ono H, Yao K, Fujishiro M. et al. Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer. Dig Endosc 2016; 28: 3-15





