Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Inhaltsverzeichnis

J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40(01): 078-086
DOI: 10.1055/a-2071-3250

Original Article

Technical Variables in Lower Extremity Free Flap Reconstruction

Joani M. Christensen

¹Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri

,

Leah Ahn

²Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

,

Mara Z. Meulendijks

²Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

,

David Iskhakov

²Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

,

Frankie Wong

³Harvard Plastic Surgery Residency Training Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

,

Jonathan Winograd

²Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

,

Ian L. Valerio

²Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

,

Curtis L. Cetrulo Jr.

²Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

,

Lydia A. Helliwell

⁴Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

,

Kyle R. Eberlin

²Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

› Institutsangaben

MedOne

Abstract

Background Lower extremity free flap failure rates are higher than in other areas of the body. While prior studies assessed the effect of intraoperative technical variables, these generally investigated individual variables and did not examine relationships between the many individual technical decisions made during free tissue reconstruction. Our purpose was to investigate the effect of variation in intraoperative microsurgical techniques on flap outcomes in a diverse cohort of patients requiring lower extremity free flap coverage.

Methods Consecutive patients undergoing free flap reconstruction of the lower extremity at two level 1 trauma centers from January 2002 to January 2020 were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes, followed by a review of medical records. Information regarding demographics and comorbidities, indications, intraoperative technical details, and complications was collected. Outcomes of interest included an unplanned return to the operating room, arterial thrombosis, venous thrombosis, partial flap failure, and total flap failure. Bivariate analysis was performed.

Results In total, 410 patients underwent 420 free tissue transfers. The median follow-up time was 17 months (interquartile ranges: 8.0–37). Total flap failure occurred in 4.9% (n = 20), partial flap failure in 5.9% (n = 24), and unplanned reoperation in 9.0% (n = 37), with arterial thrombosis in 3.2% (n = 13) and venous thrombosis in 5.4% (n = 22). Overall complications were significantly associated with recipient artery choice, with arteries other than PT and AT/DP having a higher rate (p = 0.033), and with arterial revisions (p = 0.010). Total flap failure was also associated with revision of the arterial anastomosis (p = 0.035), and partial flap failure was associated with recipient artery choice (p = 0.032).

Conclusion Many interoperative options and techniques are available when performing microvascular lower extremity reconstruction that leads to equally high success rates. However, the use of arterial inflow outside of the posterior tibial and anterior tibial arteries leads to a higher overall complication rate and partial flap failure rate. Intraoperative revision of the arterial anastomosis portends poorly for ultimate flap survival.

Keywords

Keywords

free flap - lower extremity - microsurgery - microvascular lower extremity - reconstruction - limb salvage

References
1 Harashina T. Analysis of 200 free flaps. Br J Plast Surg 1988; 41 (01) 33-36
2 Muramatsu K, Shigetomi M, Ihara K, Kawai S, Doi K. Vascular complication in free tissue transfer to the leg. Microsurgery 2001; 21 (08) 362-365
3 Wong FK, Christensen JM, Meulendijks MZ, Ahn L, Iskhakov D, Eberlin KR. Secondary surgery after lower extremity free tissue reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (10s): 80
4 Khouri RK, Shaw WW. Reconstruction of the lower extremity with microvascular free flaps: a 10-year experience with 304 consecutive cases. J Trauma 1989; 29 (08) 1086-1094
5 Gill PS, Hunt JP, Guerra AB. et al. A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113 (04) 1153-1160
6 Haddock NT, Teotia SS. Consecutive 265 profunda artery perforator flaps: refinements, satisfaction, and functional outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (04) e2682
7 Heiman AJ, Gabbireddy SR, Kotamarti VS, Ricci JA. A meta-analysis of autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction and timing of adjuvant radiation therapy. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (04) 336-345
8 Chaivanichsiri P. Influence of recipient vessels on free tissue transplantation of the extremities. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (04) 970-975
9 Tian J, Chen ZB, Li J. Use of muscle feeding arteries as recipient vessels for soft tissue reconstruction in lower extremities. Curr Med Sci 2020; 40 (04) 739-744
10 Liu J, Wu Y, Zhou M. et al. Repair of severe peri-knee soft tissue defect using an anterolateral thigh flap with the descending genicular vessels as the recipient pedicle: a case series of 14 patients. Ann Palliat Med 2021; 10 (05) 5341-5350
11 Fang T, Zhang EW, Lineaweaver WC, Zhang F. Recipient vessels in the free flap reconstruction around the knee. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 71 (04) 429-433
12 Fu J, Gao J, Yi Y. et al. The clinical application of medial sural vessels as recipient vessels in repairing traumatic tissue defects in the lower limbs. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 84 (04) 418-424
13 Hong JP, Park CJ, Suh HP. Importance of vascularity and selecting the recipient vessels of lower extremity reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (01) 83-88
14 Stranix JT, Borab ZM, Rifkin WJ. et al. Proximal versus distal recipient vessels in lower extremity reconstruction: a retrospective series and systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (05) 334-340
15 Power HA, Cho J, Kwon JG. et al. Are perforators reliable as recipient arteries in lower extremity reconstruction? analysis of 423 free perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 149 (03) 750-760
16 Hallock GG. Both superficial and deep extremity veins can be used successfully as the recipient site for free flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2000; 44 (06) 633-636
17 Lorenzo AR, Lin CH, Lin CH. et al. Selection of the recipient vein in microvascular flap reconstruction of the lower extremity: analysis of 362 free-tissue transfers. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (05) 649-655
18 Broer PN, Moellhoff N, Mayer JM, Heidekrueger PI, Ninkovic M, Ehrl D. Comparison of outcomes of end-to-end versus end-to-side anastomoses in lower extremity free flap reconstructions. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (06) 432-437
19 Jandali S, Wu LC, Vega SJ, Kovach SJ, Serletti JM. 1000 consecutive venous anastomoses using the microvascular anastomotic coupler in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (03) 792-798
20 Kulkarni AR, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL. et al. Venous thrombosis in handsewn versus coupled venous anastomoses in 857 consecutive breast free flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (03) 178-182
21 Stranix JT, Rifkin WJ, Lee ZH. et al. Comparison of hand-sewn versus coupled venous anastomoses in traumatic lower extremity reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (01) 31-36
22 Medina ND, Fischer JP, Fosnot J, Serletti JM, Wu LC, Kovach III SJ. Lower extremity free flap outcomes using an anastomotic venous coupler device. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 72 (02) 176-179
23 Ducic I, Brown BJ, Rao SS. Lower extremity free flap reconstruction outcomes using venous coupler. Microsurgery 2011; 31 (05) 360-364
24 Kisser U, Adderson-Kisser C, Baumeister P, Reiter M. Influence of coupler size on revision rate and timing of revision after free flap tissue transfer in the head and neck. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 275 (01) 199-206
25 Hanson SE, Mitchell MB, Palivela N. et al. Smaller diameter anastomotic coupling devices have higher rates of venous thrombosis in microvascular free tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (06) 1293-1300
26 Patterson CW, Stalder MW, Richardson W, Steele T, Wise MW, St Hilaire H. Timing of free flaps for traumatic wounds of the lower extremity: have advances in perioperative care changed the treatment algorithm?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (08) 616-621
27 Lee SY, Seong IH, Park BY. When is the critical time for soft tissue reconstruction of open tibia fracture patients?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (03) 249-255
28 Lee ZH, Stranix JT, Levine JP. The optimal timing of traumatic lower extremity reconstruction: current consensus. Clin Plast Surg 2021; 48 (02) 259-266
29 Piwnica-Worms W, Stranix JT, Othman S. et al. Risk factors for lower extremity amputation following attempted free flap limb salvage. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (07) 528-533
30 Black CK, Ormiston LD, Fan KL, Kotha VS, Attinger C, Evans KK. Amputations versus salvage: reconciling the differences. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (01) 32-41
31 Azoury SC, Stranix JT, Kovach SJ, Levin LS. Principles of orthoplastic surgery for lower extremity reconstruction: why is this important?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (01) 42-50
32 Kim KG, Tirrell AR, Dekker PK. et al. The need to improve patient-centered outcome reporting following lower extremity flap reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (09) 764-773
33 Mundy LR, Klassen A, Sergesketter AR. et al. Content validity of the LIMB-Q: a patient-reported outcome instrument for lower extremity trauma patients. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (09) 625-633
34 van Bekkum S, de Jong T, Zuidam M, Mureau MAM. Long-term quality of life after free flap upper extremity reconstruction for traumatic injuries. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (03) 213-222