Therapeutic decisions for early-stage colon cancer discovered after polypectomy are
complex [1]. Surgical colectomy is associated with a low rate of residual cancer, but significant
morbidity. In select patients, endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) may be an
option [2]
[3]. We report EFTR using an endoscopic sleeve (Dilumen; Lumendi) with multiple endoscopic
tools.
The endoscopic sleeve has two balloons to improve the navigation and stability of
the colon. The fore-balloon is extended using pushrods to create the “therapeutic
zone” [4]. However, the fore-balloon cannot be deployed in the cecum or near an anastomosis
([Fig. 1]). In the present case, the fore-balloon and pushrods were removed in order to use
two additional instruments via the empty pushrod channels. Moreover, one additional
tool attached to the endoscope tip can be passed through the sleeve ([Fig. 2]) [5].
Fig. 1 a An endoscopic sleeve (Dilumen, Lumendi). b Use of the endoscopic sleeve in the transverse colon and the cecum.
Fig. 2 a Removal of fore-balloon and pushrods enables the use of two endoscopic tools through
the sleeve channels. b A 3–0 silk loop was tied around the colonoscope at 6 o’clock, about 2 cm from the
tip. A PolyLoop was passed through the 3–0 silk loop and reinserted through the sleeve
alongside the colonoscope.
A 73-year-old man underwent polypectomy near an ileocolic anastomosis. Pathology showed
invasive adenocarcinoma and a residual lesion was suspected; therefore, EFTR was planned.
A colonoscope (Olympus) with the sleeve was advanced to the scarred lesion ([Fig. 3]). A PolyLoop (Olympus) attached to the endoscope tip was opened around the lesion.
Two graspers (Steris) inserted through the sleeve channels were navigated to the lesion
with a biopsy forceps (Boston Scientific) through the endoscopic channel, and the
lesion was grasped and pulled up through the PolyLoop. The PolyLoop was positioned
with the biopsy forceps. Once the PolyLoop was secured, the isolated lesion was excised
with a snare (Boston Scientific). The defect was closed with clips (Boston Scientific),
reinforcing the PolyLoop closure ([Fig. 4]). Procedure time was 95 min. The patient was discharged on the day of the procedure
without complications. Pathology showed no malignant cells in the full-thickness specimen
([Fig. 5]; [Video 1]).
Fig. 3 An elevated and scarred lesion located near the ileocolic anastomosis.
Fig. 4 Endoscopic full-thickness resection using an endoscopic sleeve with multiple endoscopic
tools: a The PolyLoop was placed around 2the lesion. b The lesion was grasped with two graspers inserted through the sleeve channels. c The lesion was lifted using the graspers through the PolyLoop, and the PolyLoop was
positioned with the biopsy forceps around the area of interest. d The PolyLoop was closed, and the lesion was then excised with an endoscopic snare.
e Finally, the defect was closed with endoscopic clips. Red stars: endoscopic graspers;
yellow stars: biopsy forceps.
Fig. 5 Pathological findings revealed that the resected specimen included all layers from
mucosa to serosa, and there were no malignant cells.
Video 1 Endoscopic full-thickness resection near an ileocolic anastomosis using an endoscopic
sleeve with multiple endoscopic tools.
The use of two graspers and a PolyLoop could provide more retraction and enable the
removal of larger lesions under direct vision. This type of endoscopic sleeve can
be adapted to permit multiple channels and tools, enabling EFTR in the colon.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AQ_2AD
Endoscopy E-Videos is an open access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques
in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all
contributions are freely accessible online. Processing charges apply (currently EUR
375), discounts and wavers acc. to HINARI are available.
This section has its own submission
website at
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos