RSS-Feed abonnieren
PDF herunterladen
DOI: 10.1055/a-1481-8473
Swimming with Swimsuit and Wetsuit at Typical vs. Cold-water Temperatures (26 vs. 18 ℃)
Funding The authors recognize the subjects and researchers efforts along the data collection. This study was supported by grants awarded by the Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (Spanish Agency of Research) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF); PGC2018–102116-B-I00 “SWIM II: Specific Water Innovative Measurements: Applied to the performance improvement” and the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport: FPU16/02629 grant. This article is a part of an international thesis belonging to the Program of PhD in Biomedicine (B11.56.1) from the University of Granada, Granada (Spain).
Abstract
This study aimed to compare three swimming conditions in a swimming flume with water at 26 ℃ (using swimsuit) and 18 ℃ (randomly with swimsuit and wetsuit). Seventeen swimmers (32.4±14.7 years old, 175.6±0.06 cm height, and 70.4±9.8 kg body mass) performed three bouts until exhaustion at a 400-m front crawl pace (24 h intervals). ANOVA repeated measures compared the experimental conditions. Swimming at 26 ℃ with swimsuit evidenced a higher metabolic demand (total energy expenditure; (E)), comparing to 18 ℃ swimsuit (p=0.05) and with 18 ℃ wetsuit (p=0.04). The 26 ℃ swimsuit condition presented higher peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), blood lactate concentrations ([La-]peak), rate of perceived exertion (RPE), maximal heart rate (HRmax), anaerobic lactic energy (AnL), E, energy cost (C), V̇O2 amplitude (Ap), and stroke rate (SR), but lower stroke length (SL) and stroke index (SI) than 18 ℃ wetsuit. The 18 ℃ swimsuit condition (comparing to wetsuit) lead to higher V̇O2peak, [La-]peak, HRmax, E, C, Ap, and SR but lower SL and SI. Swimming at aerobic power intensity with swim and wetsuit at 18 ℃ does not induce physiologic and biomechanical disadvantages compared to 26 ℃. The results suggested that the use of wetsuit might increase performance at 18 ℃ water temperature for competitive master swimmers. Its use is thus recommended in open water swimming competitions when the water temperature is 18–20 ℃.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 20. Januar 2021
Angenommen: 07. April 2021
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
21. Mai 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Chatard JC, Senegas X, Selles M. et al. Wet suit effect - A comparison between competitive swimmers and triathletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27: 580-586
- 2 Toussaint HM, Bruinink L, Coster R. et al. Effect of a triathlon wet suit on drag during swimming. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1989; 21: 325-328
- 3 Zamparo P, Cortesi M, Gatta G. The energy cost of swimming and its determinants. Eur J Appl Physiol 2019; 120: 41-66
- 4 Cordain L, Kopriva R. Wetsuits, body density and swimming performance. Br J Sports Med 1991; 25: 31-33
- 5 De Lucas RD, Balikian P, Neiva CM. et al. The effects of wet suits on physiological and biomechanical indices during swimming. J Sci Med Sport 2000; 3: 1-8
- 6 Gay A, López-Contreras G, Fernandes RJ etal. Is Swimmers’ Performance Influenced by Wetsuit Use?. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2020; 15: 46-51
- 7 Perrier D, Monteil K. Wetsuits and performance: Influence of technical abilities. J Hum Mov Stud 2001; 41: 191-207
- 8 Trappe TA, Pease DL, Trappe SW. et al. Physiological responses to swimming while wearing a wet suit. Int J Sports Med 1996; 17: 111-114
- 9 Fédération Internationale de Natation / Marculescu C.
Swimwear for open water swimming events. FINA Rules Memorandum 2017 https://www.fina.org/swimming/approved-swimwear
MissingFormLabel
- 10 Parsons L, Day S. Do wet suits affect swimming speed?. Br J Sports Med 1986; 20: 129-131
- 11
Stocks JM,
Taylor NA,
Tipton MJ et al.
Human physiological responses to cold exposure. Aviat Space Environ Med 2004; 75:
444-457
MissingFormLabel
- 12 Bleakley CM, Davison GW. What is the biochemical and physiological rationale for using cold-water immersion in sports recovery? A systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2010; 44: 179-187
- 13 Broatch JR, Petersen A, Bishop DJ. The influence of post-exercise cold-water immersion on adaptive responses to exercise: A review of the literature. Sports Med 2018; 48: 1369-1387
- 14 Zacca R, Neves V, da Silva Oliveira T. et al. 5 km front crawl in pool and open water swimming: breath-by-breath energy expenditure and kinematic analysis. Eur J Appl Physiol 2020; 120: 2005-2018
- 15 Zamparo P, Bonifazi M, Faina M. et al. Energy cost of swimming of elite long-distance swimmers. Eur J Appl Physiol 2005; 94: 697-704
- 16 Espinosa HG, Nordsborg N, Thiel DV. Front crawl swimming analysis using accelerometers: A preliminary comparison between pool and flume. Procedia Eng 2015; 112: 497-501
- 17 Pelarigo JG, Greco CC, Denadai BS. et al. Do 5% changes around maximal lactate steady state lead to swimming biophysical modifications?. Hum Mov Sci 2016; 49: 258-266
- 18 Fernandes RJ, Vilas-Boas JP. Time to Exhaustion at the VO2max Velocity in Swimming: A Review. J Hum Kinet 2012; 32: 121-134
- 19 Zacca R, Azevedo R, Silveira RP. et al. Comparison of incremental intermittent and time trial testing in age-group swimmers. J Strength Cond Res 2019; 33: 801-810
- 20 Harriss D, MacSween A, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2020 update. Int J Sports Med 2019; 40: 813-817
- 21 McLean SP, Palmer D, Ice G. et al. Oxygen uptake response to stroke rate manipulation in freestyle swimming. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010; 42: 1909-1913
- 22 Ribeiro J, Figueiredo P, Guidetti L. et al. AquaTrainer® snorkel does not increase hydrodynamic drag but influences turning time. Int J Sports Med 2016; 37: 324-328
- 23 Zacca R, Azevedo R, Figueiredo P. et al. VO2FITTING: A Free and open-source software for modelling oxygen uptake kinetics in swimming and other exercise modalities. Sports (Basel) 2019; 7: 31
- 24 de Jesus K, Guidetti L, de Jesus K. et al. Which are the best VO2 sampling intervals to characterize low to severe swimming intensities?. Int J Sports Med 2014; 35: 1030-1036
- 25 Sousa A, Figueiredo P, Pendergast D. et al. Critical evaluation of oxygen-uptake assessment in swimming. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2014; 9: 190-202
- 26 di Prampero PE, Pendergast DR, Wilson DW et al. Blood lactic acid concentrations in high velocity swimming. In: Eriksson B, Furburg B, Eds. Swimming Medicine IV. USA, University Park Press 1978; 249-261
- 27 Zamparo P, Capelli C, Pendergast D. Energetics of swimming: A historical perspective. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011; 111: 367-378
- 28 Fernandes RJ, Marinho DA, Barbosa TM et al.. Is time limit at the minimum swimming velocity of VO2 max influenced by stroking parameters?. Percept Mot Skills 2006; 103: 67-75
- 29 Figueiredo P, Toussaint HM, Vilas-Boas JP et al.. Relation between efficiency and energy cost with coordination in aquatic locomotion. Eur J Appl Physiol 2013; 113: 651-659
- 30 Zamparo P, Pendergast D, Mollendorf J. et al. A. An energy balance of front crawl. Eur J Appl Physiol 2005; 94: 134-144
- 31 Johnson DG, Hayward J, Jacobs T. et al. Plasma norepinephrine responses of man in cold water. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 1977; 43: 216-220
- 32 Reis JF, Alves FB, Bruno PM. et al. Oxygen uptake kinetics and middle distance swimming performance. J Sci Med Sport 2012; 15: 58-63
- 33 Zamparo P, Cortesi M, Gatta G. The energy cost of swimming and its determinants. Eur J Appl Physiol 2020; 120: 41-66
- 34 Tomikawa M, Shimoyama Y, Nomura T. Factors related to the advantageous effects of wearing a wetsuit during swimming at different submaximal velocity in triathletes. J Sci Med Sport 2008; 11: 417-423
- 35
Arellano R.
Entrenamiento Técnico de Natación. Real Federación
Española de Natación. Cultiva Libros SL, Madrid. 2010
MissingFormLabel