Nervenheilkunde 2021; 40(04): 222-228
DOI: 10.1055/a-1382-0346
Schwerpunkt

Resilienz

Konzepte, Theorien und Relevanz in der COVID-19-PandemieResilienceConcepts, theories and relevance in the COVID-19 pandemic
Tüscher Oliver
1   Leibniz-Institut für Resilienzforschung gGmbH, Mainz
2   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz
5   The International Resilience Alliance e. V., intresa, Mainz
,
Raffael Kalisch
1   Leibniz-Institut für Resilienzforschung gGmbH, Mainz
3   Neuroimaging Center Mainz (NIC), Forschungszentrum Translationale Neurowissenschaften (FTN), Universitätsmedizin Mainz
5   The International Resilience Alliance e. V., intresa, Mainz
,
Carolin Wackerhagen
4   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
,
Henrik Walter
4   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
5   The International Resilience Alliance e. V., intresa, Mainz
› Author Affiliations

ZUSAMMENFASSUNG

Psychische Erkrankungen, insbesondere solche, in denen Stress ein wesentlicher pathogenetischer Faktor ist, gehören zu den häufigsten, belastendsten und kostenintensivsten Erkrankungen unserer Zeit. Andererseits ist psychische Gesundheit trotz häufiger Exposition durch allgegenwärtige Widrigkeiten und Stressoren das weitaus häufigere Phänomen als psychische Erkrankungen. Mit anderen Worten, Resilienz gegenüber stressassoziierten Erkrankungen ist der Regelfall. Die Erforschung psychischer Resilienz und ihrer zugrunde liegenden kognitiven und neurobiologischen Mechanismen bietet daher innovative Möglichkeiten zum Verständnis der natürlichen Schutzmechanismen gegenüber stressassoziierten psychischen Erkrankungen, weist neue Wege für Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung und ergänzt die krankheitsbezogene Forschung. Die Voraussetzungen für ein einheitliches Verständnis und eine erfolgreiche neurobiologische Erforschung von Resilienz sind geeignete Methoden zur Konzeptualisierung, Operationalisierung und der Planung von Studiendesigns. Zu diesen gehören ein transdiagnostisches Vorgehen, die Operationalisierung von Resilienz als „Outcome“, d. h. Ergebnis eines Entwicklungsprozesses, eine Erfassung und Berücksichtigung der Stressorexposition, längsschnittliche Studiendesigns und die translationale Identifizierung von Resilienzmechanismen.

ABSTRACT

Mental illnesses, especially those in which stress is a major pathogenetic factor, are among the most common, burdensome and costly diseases of our time. On the other hand, despite frequent exposure and omnipresent adversities and stressors, mental health is by far the more common phenomenon than mental illness, i. e. resilience to stress-associated illness is the rule. Research into psychological resilience and its underlying cognitive and neurobiological mechanisms therefore offers innovative opportunities for understanding the natural protective mechanisms against stress-associated mental illness, points to new avenues for prevention and health promotion, and complements disease-related research. The prerequisites for a uniform understanding and successful neurobiological research of resilience are appropriate methods of conceptualisations, operationalisations and study designs. These include a transdiagnostic approach, the operationalisation of resilience as the outcome of a developmental process, the appropriate measurement and consideration of stressorexposure, longitudinal study designs and the translational identification of resilience mechanisms.



Publication History

Article published online:
01 April 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Collaborators GD. et al Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018; 392 10159 1789-1858
  • 2 Schröder H. Fehlzeiten-Report 2017: Krise und Gesundheit – Ursachen, Prävention, Bewältigung. Fehlzeiten-Report. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2017
  • 3 Olesen J. et al The economic cost of brain disorders in Europe. Eur J Neurol 2012; 19 (01) 155-62
  • 4 Green JG. et al Childhood adversities and adult psychiatric disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication I: associations with first onset of DSM-IV disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010; 67 (02) 113-23
  • 5 Kessler R. et al Childhood adversities and adult psychopathology in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. Br J Psychiatry 2010; 197 (05) 378-85
  • 6 Chmitorz A. et al Assessment of Microstressors in Adults: Questionnaire Development and Ecological Validation of the Mainz Inventory of Microstressors. JMIR Ment Health 2020; 7 (02) e14566
  • 7 de Vries G, Olff M. The lifetime prevalence of traumatic events and posttraumatic stress disorder in the Netherlands. J Trauma Stress 2009; 22 (04) 259-67
  • 8 Kessler R. et al Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of mental disorders in the World Health Organization’s World Mental Health Survey Initiative. World Psychiatry 2007; 6 (03) 168-76
  • 9 Werner EE. The children of Kauai: resiliency and recovery in adolescence and adulthood. J Adolesc Health 1992; 13 (04) 262-8
  • 10 Bonanno G, Westphal M, Mancini A. Resilience to loss and potential trauma. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2011; 7: 511-35
  • 11 Kalisch R, Müller M, Tüscher O. A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience. Behav Brain Sci 2015; 38: e92
  • 12 Masten AS. Ordinary magic. Resilience processes in development. Am Psychol 2001; 56 (03) 227-38
  • 13 Kalisch R. et al The resilience framework as a strategy to combat stress-related disorders. Nat Hum Behav 2017; 1 (11) 784-790
  • 14 Wink R.. Multidisziplinäre Perspektiven der Resilienzforschung. In: Studien zur Resilienzforschung. Deppisch S, et al. (Hrsg.). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien; 2016
  • 15 Bengel J, Lyssenko L. Resilienz und psychologische Schutzfaktoren im Erwachsenenalter: Stand der Forschung zu psychologischen Schutzfaktoren von Gesundheit und Erwachsenalter. Berlin: Bundeszentrale für Gesundheitliche Aufklärung, BZgA; 2012
  • 16 Masten AS, Narayan A. Child development in the context of disaster, war, and terrorism: pathways of risk and resilience. Annu Rev Psychol 2012; 63: 227-57
  • 17 Moffitt T. et al How common are common mental disorders? Evidence that lifetime prevalence rates are doubled by prospective versus retrospective ascertainment. Psychol Med 2010; 40 (06) 899-909
  • 18 Chmitorz A. et al Longitudinal determination of resilience in humans to identify mechanisms of resilience to modern-life stressors: the longitudinal resilience assessment (LORA) study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2020: ePub
  • 19 Kalisch R, Müller M, Tüscher O. Advancing empirical resilience research. Behav Brain Sci 2015; 38: e128
  • 20 Bonanno GA, Diminich E. Annual Research Review: Positive adjustment to adversity – trajectories of minimal-impact resilience and emergent resilience. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2013; 54 (04) 378-401
  • 21 Insel T. et al Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2010; 167 (07) 748-51
  • 22 Walter H. [Research domain criteria (RDoC) : Psychiatric research as applied cognitive neuroscience]. Nervenarzt 2017; 88 (05) 538-548
  • 23 Kampa M. et al Replication of fMRI group activations in the neuroimaging battery for the Mainz Resilience Project (MARP). Neuroimage 2020; 204: 116223
  • 24 Kalisch R. et al A generic solution for the operationalization and measurement of resilience and resilience processes in longitudinal observations: rationale and basic design of the MARP and LORA studies. 2020 preprint, PsyArXiv
  • 25 Kalisch R. et al A generic solution for the operationalization and measurement of resilience and resilience processes in longitudinal observations: rationale and basic design of the MARP and LORA studies. 2020, PsyArXiv
  • 26 Mey L. et al Increases of negative affect following daily hassles are not moderated by neuroticism: An ecological momentary assessment study. Stress Health 2020; 36 (05) 615-628
  • 27 Chmitorz A. et al Population-based validation of a German version of the Brief Resilience Scale. PLoS One 2018; 13 (02) e0192761
  • 28 Kunzler AM. et al Construct Validity and Population-Based Norms of the German Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). Eur J Health Psychol 2018; 25 (03) 107-117
  • 29 Veer I. et al Psycho-social factors associated with mental resilience in the Corona lockdown. Transl Psychiatry 2021; 11 (01) 67
  • 30 Gilan D. et al Psychomorbidity, Resilience, and Exacerbating and Protective Factors During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2020; 117 (38) 625-630
  • 31 Pan K-Y, Kok AAL, Eikelenboom M. et al The mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with and without depressive, anxiety, or obsessive-compulsive disorders: a longitudinal study of three Dutch case-control cohorts. The Lancet Psychiatry 2020 DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30491-0
  • 32 Hou WK, Tong H, Liang L. et al Probable anxiety and components of psychological resilience amid COVID-19: A population-based study. Journal of Affective Disorders 2021; 282: 594-601 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.127.
  • 33 Lahiri A, Jha SS, Acharya R. et al Has loneliness and poor resilient coping influenced the magnitude of psychological distress among apparently healthy Indian adults during the lockdown? Evidence from a rapid online nation-wide cross-sectional survey. PLOS ONE 2021; 16: e0245509 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245509.
  • 34 Leng M, Wei L, Shi X. et al Mental distress and influencing factors in nurses caring for patients with COVID-19. Nursing in Critical Care; 2020: n/a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12528
  • 35 Li F, Luo S, Mu W. et al Effects of sources of social support and resilience on the mental health of different age groups during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Psychiatry 2021: 21 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-03012-1
  • 36 Ou X, Chen Y, Liang Z. et al Resilience of nurses in isolation wards during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Psychol Health Med 2021; 26: 98-106 DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2020.1861312.
  • 37 Setiawati Y, Wahyuhadi J, Joestandari F. et al Anxiety and Resilience of Healthcare Workers During COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. J Multidiscip Healthc 2021; 14: 1-8 DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S276655.
  • 38 Xiao X, Xiao J, Yao J. et al The Role of Resilience and Gender in Relation to Infectious-Disease-Specific Health Literacy and Anxiety During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2020; 16: 3011-3021 DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S277231.
  • 39 Yıldırım M, Arslan G, Aziz IA. Why Do People High in COVID-19 Worry Have More Mental Health Disorders? The Roles of Resilience and Meaning in Life. Psychiatr Danub 2020; 32: 505-512 DOI: 10.24869/psyd.2020.505.
  • 40 Satici SA, Kayis AR, Satici B. et al Resilience, Hope, and Subjective Happiness Among the Turkish Population: Fear of COVID-19 as a Mediator. Int J Ment Health Addict 2020: 1-16 DOI: 10.1007/s11469-020-00443-5
  • 41 Yıldırım M, Arslan G, Özaslan A.. Perceived Risk and Mental Health Problems among Healthcare Professionals during COVID-19 Pandemic: Exploring the Mediating Effects of Resilience and Coronavirus Fear. Int J Ment Health Addict 2020: 1-11 DOI: 10.1007/s11469-020-00424-8
  • 42 Levaot Y, Greene T, Palgi Y.. The associations between media use, peritraumatic distress, anxiety and resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Psychiatr Res 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.11.018
  • 43 Anyan F, Hjemdal O, Ernstsen L. et al Change in Physical Activity During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Lockdown in Norway: The Buffering Effect of Resilience on Mental Health. Front Psychol 2020: 11 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.598481
  • 44 Cusinato M, Iannattone S, Spoto A. et al Stress, Resilience, and Well-Being in Italian Children and Their Parents during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020: 17 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17228297
  • 45 Lenzo V, Quattropani MC, Musetti A. et al Resilience Contributes to Low Emotional Impact of the COVID-19 Outbreak Among the General Population in Italy. Front Psychol 2020: 11 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.576485
  • 46 Marchini S, Zaurino E, Bouziotis J. et al Study of resilience and loneliness in youth 18–25 years old) during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown measures. Journal of Community Psychology n/a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22473
  • 47 Petzold MB, Bendau A, Plag J. et al Risk, resilience, psychological distress, and anxiety at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Brain Behav 2020 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1745
  • 48 Tsibidaki A. Anxiety, meaning in life, self-efficacy and resilience in families with one or more members with special educational needs and disability during COVID-19 pandemic in Greece. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2021; 109: 103830 DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103830.
  • 49 Zager Kocjan G, Kavčič T, Avsec A. Resilience matters: Explaining the association between personality and psychological functioning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Clin Health Psychol 2021: 21 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.08.002
  • 50 Davidson B, Schmidt E, Mallar C. et al Risk and resilience of well-being in caregivers of young children in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Translational Behavioral Medicine 2020 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa124
  • 51 Killgore WDS, Taylor EC, Cloonan SA. et al Psychological resilience during the COVID-19 lockdown. Psychiatry Res 2020; 291: 113216 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113216.
  • 52 Riehm KE, Brenneke SG, Adams LB. et al Association between psychological resilience and changes in mental distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Affective Disorders 2021; 282: 381-385 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.071.
  • 53 Coulombe S, Pacheco T, Cox E. et al Risk and Resilience Factors During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Snapshot of the Experiences of Canadian Workers Early on in the Crisis. Front Psychol 2020: 11 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580702
  • 54 Connor KM, Davidson JRT. Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety 2003; 18: 76-82 DOI: 10.1002/da.10113.
  • 55 Smith BW, Dalen J, Wiggins K. et al The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2008; 15: 194-200 DOI: 10.1080/10705500802222972.
  • 56 Wagnild GM, Young HM. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale. J Nurs Meas 1993; 1: 165-178
  • 57 Goldberg DP, Gater R, Sartorius N. et al The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol Med 1997; 27: 191-197 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291796004242.