Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2022; 43(01): 46-54
DOI: 10.1055/a-1373-6033
Training & Testing

Effects of 7-week Resistance Training on Handcycle Performance in Able-bodied Males

Ulric Sena Abonie 
1   Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
,
Tryntje Albada
2   Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
,
Floor Morrien
2   Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
,
Lucas van der Woude
2   Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
,
Florentina Hettinga
3   Department of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The effect of an upper body resistance training program on maximal and submaximal handcycling performance in able-bodied males was explored. Eighteen able-bodied men were randomly assigned to a training group (TG: n=10) and a control group (CG: n=8). TG received 7 weeks of upper body resistance training (60% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM), 3×10 repetitions, 6 exercise stations, 2 times per week). CG received no training. Peak values for oxygen uptake (V˙O2peak), power output (POpeak), heart rate (HRpeak), minute ventilation (V˙OEpeak) and respiratory exchange ratio (RERpeak), submaximal values (HR, V˙O2, RER, PO, and gross mechanical efficiency (GE)), and time to exhaustion (TTE) were determined in an incremental test pre- and post-training. Maximal isokinetic arm strength and 1RM tests were conducted. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were assessed. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA and post-hoc comparisons were performed to examine the effect of time, group and its interaction (p<0.05). TG improved on POpeak (8.55%), TTE (10.73%), and 1RM (12.28–38.98%). RPE at the same stage during pre- and post-test was lower during the post-test (8.17%). Despite no improvements in V˙O2peak, training improved POpeak, muscular strength, and TTE. Upper body resistance training has the potential to improve handcycling performance.

Key words

rehabilitation - handbiking - wheelchair user - physical capacity evaluation - upper body training


Publication History

Received: 21 September 2020

Accepted: 04 January 2021

Article published online:
11 August 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 World Health Organization. World Report on Disability. Global estimates of disability prevalence. 2011. http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/en/index.html. Accessed April 25, 2013
  • 2 World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia. Fact Sheet on Wheelchairs. WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia. 2010; https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/205041. Accessed on June 9, 2020
  • 3 Van der Woude LHV, De Groot S, Janssen TWJ. Manual wheelchairs: research and innovation in rehabilitation, sports, daily life and health. Med Eng Phys 2006; 28: 905-915
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Van der Woude LHV, Groot S. Wheelchair propulsion: A straining form of ambulation. Indian J Med Res 2005; 121: 719-722
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Van Drongelen S, De Groot S, Veeger HE. et al. Upper extremity musculoskeletal pain during and after rehabilitation in wheelchair-using persons with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2006; 44: 152-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Arnet U, Van Drongelen S, Scheel-Sailer A. et al. Shoulder load during synchronous handcycling and handrim wheelchair propulsion in persons with paraplegia. J Rehabil Med 2012; 44: 222-228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Abel T, Schneider S, Platen P. et al. Performance diagnostics in handbiking during competition. Spinal Cord 2006; 44: 211-216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Mukherjee G, Samanta A. Physiological response to the ambulatory performance of hand-rim and arm-crank propulsion systems. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001; 38: 391-399
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kraaijenbrink C, Vegter RJ, Hensen AH. et al. Biomechanical and physiological differences between synchronous and asynchronous low intensity handcycling during practice-based learning in able-bodied men. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2020; 17: 1-3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kouwijzer I, Valent L, Osterthun R. et al. HandbikeBattle group. Peak power output in handcycling of individuals with a chronic spinal cord injury: Predictive modeling, validation and reference values. Disabil Rehabil 2020; 42: 400-409
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Haisma JA, van der Woude LH. Stam et al. Physical capacity in wheelchair-dependent persons with a spinal cord injury: A critical review of the literature. Spinal Cord 2006; 44: 642-652
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Valent L, Dallmeijer A, Houdijk H. et al. The effects of upper body exercise on the physical capacity of people with a spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2007; 21: 315-330
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Abonie US, Monden P, van der Woude LHV. et al. Effect of a 7-week low intensity synchronous handcycling training program on physical capacity in able-bodied women. J Sports Sci 2021; 39: 1472-1480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Zoeller RR, Riechman SE. Dabayebeh et al. Relation between muscular strength and cardiorespiratory fitness in people with thoracic-level paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1441-1446
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Glaser RM. Arm exercise training for wheelchair users. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1989; 21: 149-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hettinga FJ, Hoogwerf M, van der Woude LH. Handcycling: Training effects of a specific dose of upper body endurance training in females. Eur J Appl Physiol 2016; 116: 1387-1394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hettinga FJ, de Groot S, van Dijk F. et al. Physical strain of handcycling: an evaluation using training guidelines for a healthy lifestyle as defined by the American College of Sports Medicine. J Spinal Cord Med 2013; 36: 376-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Chaikhot D, Reed K, Petroongrad W. et al. Effects of an upper-body training program involving resistance exercise and high-intensity arm cranking on peak handcycling performance and wheelchair propulsion efficiency in able-bodied men. J Strength Cond Res 2020; 34: 2267-2275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Schoenmakers P, Reed K, Van Der Woude L. et al. High intensity interval training in handcycling: the effects of a 7 week training intervention in able-bodied men. Front Physiol 2016; 7: 638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Cooney MM, Walker JB. Hydraulic resistance exercise benefits cardiovascular fitness of spinal cord injured. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1986; 18: 522-525
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Davis GM, Shephard RJ. Strength training for wheelchair users. Br J Sports Med 1990; 24: 25-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Nilsson S, Staff PH, Pruett ED. Physical work capacity and the effect of training on subjects with long-standing paraplegia. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975; 7: 51-56
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Jacobs PL, Nash MS, Rusinowski JW. Circuit training provides cardiorespiratory and strength benefits in persons with paraplegia. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 711-717
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Jacobs PL. Effects of resistance and endurance training in persons with paraplegia. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 992-997
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 American College of Sports Medicine.. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 9th ed.. Philadephia, PA: Lippincot Williams and Wilkins; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Quittmann OJ, Abel T, Albracht K. et al. Biomechanics of handcycling propulsion in a 30-min continuous load test at lactate threshold: Kinetics, kinematics, and muscular activity in able-bodied participants. Eur J Appl Physiol 2020; 120: 1403-1415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Quittmann OJ, Abel T, Albracht K. et al. Reliability of muscular activation patterns and their alterations during incremental handcycling in able-bodied participants. Sport Biomech 2021; 603-618
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Cardinal BJ, Esters J, Cardinal MK. Evaluation of the revised Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire in older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996; 28: 468-472
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Harriss DJ, Macsween A, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2020 update. Int J Sports Med 2019; 40: 813-817
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Hass CJ, Feigenbaum MS, Franklin BA. Prescription of resistance training for healthy populations. Sports Med 2001; 31: 953-964
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 687-700
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Bafghi HA, de Haan A, Horstman A. et al. Biophysical aspects of submaximal hand cycling. Int J Sports Med 2008; 29: 630-638
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Levinger I, Goodman C, Hare DL. et al. The reliability of the 1RM strength test for untrained middle-aged individuals. J Sci Med Sports 2009; 12: 310-316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Gardner AS, Stephens S, Martin DT. et al. Accuracy of SRM and power tap power monitoring systems for bicycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 1252-1258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Van der Woude LHV, van Croonenborg JJ, Wolff I. et al. Physical work capacity after 7 weeks of wheelchair training: Effect of intensity in able-bodied subjects. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: 331-341
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Dallmeijer AJ, Zentgraaff ID, Zijp NI. et al. Submaximal physical strain and peak performance in handcycling versus handrim wheelchair propulsion. Spinal Cord 2004; 42: 91-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Borg GAV. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982; 14: 377-381
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Noble BJ, Robertson RJ. Perceived Exertion. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics;; 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 39 De Groot S, De Bruin M, Noomen SP. et al. Mechanical efficiency and propulsion technique after 7 weeks of low-intensity wheelchair training. Clin Biomech 2008; 23: 434-441
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Garby L, Astrup A. The relationship between the respiratory quotient and the energy equivalent of oxygen during simultaneous glucose and lipid oxidation and lipogenesis. Acta Physiol Scand 1987; 129: 443-444
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Nevin J, Smith P, Waldron M. et al. Efficacy of an 8-week concurrent strength and endurance training program on hand cycling performance. J Strength Cond Res 2018; 32: 1861-1868
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Hicks AL, Martin KA, Ditor DS. et al. Long-term exercise training in persons with spinal cord injury: effects on strength, arm ergometry performance and psychological well-being. Spinal Cord 2003; 41: 34-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Kraemer WJ, Descchenes MR, Fleck SJ. Physiological adaptations to resistance exercise: Implications for athletic conditioning. Sports Med 1988; 6: 246-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Gettman LR, Pollack ML. Circuit weight training: A critical review of its physiological benefits. Phys Sportsmed 1981; 9: 44-60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Schantz P, Randall-Fox E, Hutchison W. et al. Muscle fibre type distribution, muscle cross-sectional area and maximal voluntary strength in humans. Acta Physiol Scand 1983; 117: 219-226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Hakkinen K, Newton RU, Gordon SE. et al. Changes in muscle morphology, electromyographic activity, and force production characteristics during progressive strength training in young and older men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1998; 53: 415-423
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Abe T, DeHoyos DV, Pollock ML. et al. Time course for strength and muscle thickness changes following upper and lower body resistance training in men and women. Eur J Appl Physiol 2000; 81: 174-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Söderman K, Lindström B. The relevance of using isokinetic measures to evaluate strength. Adv Physiother 2010; 12: 194-200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 van der Woude LH, de Groot G, Hollander AP. et al. Wheelchair ergonomics and physiological testing of prototypes. Ergonomics 1986; 29: 1561-1573
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Thompson E, Snodgrass S, Osmotherly P. Injuries, practices and perceptions of wheelchair sports participants. Physiotherapy 2015; 101: 1515-1516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar