Chairside gefertigte monolithische Zirkonoxidkronen – praktische Empfehlungen zu Materialauswahl und klinischem Vorgehen

Seit der Einführung des ersten kommerziellen CAD/CAM-Systems (Computer-aided Design/Computer-aided Manufacturing) (CEREC-System, Dentsply Sirona, Bensheim) für die Fertigung indirekter dentaler Restaurationen in einem Behandlungstermin (Chairside-Verfahren) hat diese Technologie eine beständige Indikationserweiterung erfahren. Dies ist auf wesentliche Fortschritte bei intraoralen Scanverfahren und Weiterentwicklungen bei der Designsoftware und der Fertigungstechnologie zurückzuführen [1]. Darüber hinaus hat die Entwicklung neuer, speziell für den Chairside-Einsatz konzipierter Materialien zu einer Indikationserweiterung im Bereich der festsitzenden Prothetik geführt [2], [3]. In diesem Zusammenhang ist der Einsatz transluzenter Zirkonoxidvarianten für die Herstellung monolithischer Kronen und Brücken durch eine beständige Weiterentwicklung der Materialien und auch der Prozesstechnologie (Schnellsinterverfahren) in den Fokus des Interesses gerückt [4], [5].

Publication History

Article published online:
12 August 2020

• Literatur

• 1 Zaruba M, Mehl A. Chairside systems: a current review. Int J Comput Dent 2017; 20: 123-149
• 2 Sulaiman TA. Materials in digital dentistry – A review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020; 32: 171-181
• 3 Spitznagel FA, Boldt J, Gierthmuehlen PC. CAD/CAM Ceramic Restorative Materials for Natural Teeth. J Dent Res 2018; 97: 1082-1091
• 4 Blatz MB, Conejo J. The Current State of Chairside Digital Dentistry and Materials. Dent Clin North Am 2019; 63: 175-197
• 5 Wiedhahn K, Fritzsche G, Wiedhahn C. et al. Zirconia crowns – the new standard for single-visit dentistry?. Int J Comput Dent 2016; 19: 9-26
• 6 Güth JF, Stawarczyk B, Edelhoff D. et al. Zirconia and its novel compositions: What do clinicians need to know?. Quintessence Int 2019; 50: 512-520
• 7 Zarone F, Di Mauro MI, Ausiello P. et al. Current status on lithium disilicate and zirconia: a narrative review. BMC Oral Health 2019; 19: 134
• 8 Kontonasaki E, Rigos AE, Ilia C. et al. Monolithic Zirconia: An Update to Current Knowledge. Optical Properties, Wear, and Clinical Performance. Dent J 2019; 7: 90
• 9 Zucuni CP, Venturini AB, Prochnow C. et al. Load-bearing capacity under fatigue and survival rates of adhesively cemented yttrium-stabilized zirconia polycrystal monolithic simplified restorations. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2019; 90: 673-680
• 10 Pekkan G, Pekkan K, Bayindir BÇ. et al. Factors affecting the translucency of monolithic zirconia ceramics: A review from materials science perspective. Dent Mater J 2020; 39: 1-8
• 11 Cardoso KV, Adabo GL, Mariscal-Muñoz E. et al. Effect of sintering temperature on microstructure, flexural strength, and optical properties of a fully stabilized monolithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2019; DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.08.007.
• 12 Ghodsi S, Jafarian Z. A Review on Translucent Zirconia. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2018; 26: 62-74
• 13 Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M. et al. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part I. Quintessence Int 2017; 48: 369-380
• 14 Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M. et al. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part II. Quintessence Int 2017; 48: 441-450
• 15 Kwon SJ, Lawson NC, McLaren EE. et al. Comparison of the mechanical properties of translucent zirconia and lithium disilicate. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 120: 132-137
• 16 Kontonasaki E, Giasimakopoulos P, Rigos AE. Strength and aging resistance of monolithic zirconia: an update to current knowledge. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 2020; 56: 1-23
• 17 Shimoe S, Peng TY, Otaku M. et al. Influence of various airborne-particle abrasion conditions on bonding between zirconia ceramics and an indirect composite resin material. J Prosthet Dent 2019; 122: 491.e1-491.e9
• 18 Kolakarnprasert N, Kaizer MR, Kim DK. et al. New multi-layered zirconias: Composition, microstructure and translucency. Dent Mater 2019; 35: 797-806
• 19 Tabatabaian F. Color Aspect of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations: A Review of the Literature. J Prosthodont 2019; 28: 276-287
• 20 Sanal FA, Kilinc H. Effect of shade and sintering temperature on the translucency parameter of a novel multi-layered monolithic zirconia in different thicknesses. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020; DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12598.
• 21 Pereira GKR, Guilardi LF, Dapieve KS. et al. Mechanical reliability, fatigue strength and survival analysis of new polycrystalline translucent zirconia ceramics for monolithic restorations. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018; 85: 57-65
• 22 Baldissara P, Wandscher VF, Marchionatti AME. et al. Translucency of IPS e.max and cubic zirconia monolithic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 120: 269-275
• 23 Erdelt K, Pinheiro Dias Engler ML, Beuer F. et al. Computable translucency as a function of thickness in a multi-layered zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2019; 121: 683-689
• 24 Yoon SN, Han JS, Yeo IS. et al. Full mouth rehabilitation of a severely worn dentition using intraoral scanner and the CAD/CAM double scanning technique. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2020; 58: 67
• 25 Kauling AE, Güth JF, Erdelt K. et al. Influence of speed sintering on the fit and fracture strength of 3-unit monolithic zirconia fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2019; DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.003.
• 26 Kaizer MR, Gierthmuehlen PC, Dos Santos MB. et al. Speed sintering translucent zirconia for chairside one-visit dental restorations: Optical, mechanical, and wear characteristics. Ceram Int 2017; 43: 10999-11005