Download PDF
Arthritis und Rheuma 2020; 40(03): 153-162
DOI: 10.1055/a-1162-2541
Schwerpunkt
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Röntgendiagnostik in der Rheumatologie im Jahr 2020

Radiography in the field of Rheumatology in 2020
Alexander Pfeil∗
1   Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena
,
Joachim Böttcher∗
2   Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Medizinische Fakultät, Jena
,
Peter Oelzner∗
1   Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena
,
Tobias Hoffmann∗
1   Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena
,
Gunter Wolf∗
1   Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena
,
Diane M. Renz∗
3   Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
16 June 2020 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ZUSAMMENFASSUNG

In der Diagnostik von rheumatologischen Erkrankungen im Bereich der peripheren Gelenke und des Achsenskelettes stellt das Röntgenbild weiterhin die primäre bildgebende Diagnostik aufgrund der ubiquitären Verfügbarkeit als auch der standardisierten Durchführbarkeit dar. Die Röntgendiagnostik wird insbesondere zur Beurteilung der Manifestation einer rheumatologischen Erkrankung am Achsenskelett und an den peripheren Gelenken, zur Verifizierung des radiologischen Schweregrades und zur Quantifizierung der radiologischen Progression bei Patienten mit einer rheumatoiden Arthritis, Psoriasisarthritis, Arthrose und Osteoporose eingesetzt. Die Beurteilung des radiologischen Schweregrades ist über verschiedene Scoring-Modelle möglich, wobei die krankheitsspezifischen Scores vor allem in klinischen Studien eingesetzt werden und in der klinischen Routine kaum Beachtung finden. Eine Aussage in Bezug auf Weichteilstrukturen bzw. zu intraossären entzündlichen Veränderungen ist durch die Röntgendiagnostik nur in einem sehr begrenzten Umfang möglich, sodass hier auf additive bildgebende Verfahren, beispielsweise die Magnetresonanztomografie zurückgegriffen werden muss.

ABSTRACT

The diagnostic imaging of rheumatic diseases is still primary based on radiographs due to its advanced availability and its standardized acquisition. Radiographs were used to evaluate the manifestation of rheumatic disease regarding axial skeleton and peripheral joints, the radiographic severity and radiological progression in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. Different scoring models were used to quantify radiographic severity, whereas the scores were preferential used in clinical studies and play only a limited role in the clinical practice. Additionally, the evaluation of soft tissue and intraosseous inflammatory alterations is restricted by radiographs. In this context, additionally imaging for example magnetic resonance imaging is recommended for the further detailed evaluation.

Schlüsselwörter

Röntgendiagnostik - Rheumatologie - rheumatoide Arthritis - Psoriasisarthritis - Arthrose - Spondyloarthritis - Osteoporose

Keywords

X-ray - rheumatology - rheumatoid arthritis - psoriatic arthritis - osteoarthritis - spondyloarthritis - osteoporosis
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Brkic A, Terslev L, Møller Døhn U. et al Clinical Applicability of Ultrasound in Systemic Large Vessel Vasculitides. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019; 71 (11) 1780-1787
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Ohrndorf S, Backhaus M.. Pro musculoskeletal ultrasonography in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2015; 33 (04) (Suppl. 92) S50-S53
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Werner SG, Langer HE, Ohrndorf S. et al Inflammation assessment in patients with arthritis using a novel in vivo fluorescence optical imaging technology. Ann Rheum Dis 2012; 71 (04) 504-510
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Pfeil A, Drummer KF, Oelzner P. et al Fluorescence optical imaging as a novel technique for the visualisation of inflammation in patients with systemic sclerosis with Raynaud’s phenomenon: a pilot study. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73 (06) 1279-1280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Pfeil A, Lehmann G, Böttcher J. et al The role of first-pass perfusion deficit in the detection of cardiac subendocardial manifestation in patients with autoimmune vasculitis. Rheumatol Int 2013; 33 (01) 29-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Weber U, Baraliakos X.. Imaging in axial spondyloarthritis: Changing concepts and thresholds. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2018; 32 (03) 342-356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Sewerin P, Schleich C, Vordenbäumen S. et al Update on imaging in rheumatic diseases: cartilage. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2018; 36 (Suppl. 114) (05) 139-144
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Seifert P, Drescher R, Pfeil A. et al Large-vessel vasculitis in positron emission tomography and ultrasound fusion imaging. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2017; 56 (11) 1992
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Zacher J, Carl HD, Swoboda B. et al Bildgebung bei der Arthrose peripherer Gelenke. Z Rheumatol 2007; 66 (03) 257-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Brown AK.. How to interpret plain radiographs in clinical practice. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2013; 27 (02) 249-269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Spahn M, Heer V, Freytag R.. Flachbilddetektoren in der Röntgendiagnostik. Radiologe 2003; 43 (05) 340-350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Chen TS, Crues 3rd JV, Ali M. et al Magnetic resonance imaging is more sensitive than radiographs in detecting change in size of erosions in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2006; 33 (10) 1957-1967
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Bruynesteyn K, Landewé R, van der Linden S. et al Radiography as primary outcome in rheumatoid arthritis: acceptable sample sizes for trials with 3 months’ follow up. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 1413-1418
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Fleischmann RM, Genovese MC, Enejosa JV. et al Safety and effectiveness of upadacitinib or adalimumab plus methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis over 48 weeks with switch to alternate therapy in patients with insufficient response. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 78: 1454-1462
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kavanaugh A, Ritchlin C, Rahman P. et al PSUMMIT-1 and 2 Study Groups Ustekinumab, an anti-IL-12/23 p40 monoclonal antibody, inhibits radiographic progression in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: results of an integrated analysis of radiographic data from the phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled PSUMMIT-1 and PSUMMIT-2 trials. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73: 1000-1006
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Drosos AA, Pelechas E, Voulgari PV.. Conventional radiography of the hands and wrists in rheumatoid arthritis. What a rheumatologist should know and how to interpret the radiological findings. Rheumatol Int 2019; 39 (08) 1331-1341
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Rau R, Lingg G, Wassenberg S. et al Bildgebende Verfahren in der Rheumatologie: Konventionelle Röntgendiagnostik bei der rheumatoiden Arthritis. Z Rheumatol 2005; 64 (07) 473-487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Pfeil A, Haugeberg G, Hansch A. et al Value of digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the assessment of inflammatory bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011; 63 (05) 666-674
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Llopis E, Kroon HM, Acosta J. et al Conventional Radiology in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Radiol Clin North Am 2017; 55 (05) 917-941
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Rau R, Wassenberg S.. Bildgebende Verfahren in der Rheumatologie: Scoring-Methoden bei der rheumatoiden Arthritis. Z Rheumatol 2003; 62 (06) 555-565
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 van der Heijde DM, van Riel PL, Nuver-Zwart ICH. et al Effects of hydroxychloroquine and sulphasalazine on progression of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 1989; 1 8646 1036-1038
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Landewé R, Strand V, van der Heijde D.. From inhibition of radiographic progression to maintaining structural integrity: a methodological framework for radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 72 (07) 1113-1117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Landewé RB, Connell CA, Bradley JD. et al Is radiographic progression in modern rheumatoid arthritis trials still a robust outcome? Experience from tofacitinib clinical trials. Arthritis Res Ther 2016; 18 (01) 212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 van der Heijde D, Sharp J, Wassenberg S. et al Psoriatic arthritis imaging: a review of scoring methods. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64 (Suppl. 02) ii61-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Polachek A, Cook R, Chandran V. et al The association between sonographic enthesitis and radiographic damage in psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2017; 19 (01) 189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Wassenberg S.. Radiographic scoring methods in psoriatic arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2015; 33 (05) (Suppl. 93) S55-S59
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Wassenberg S, Fischer-Kahle V, Herborn G. et al A method to score radiographic change in psoriatic arthritis. Z Rheumatol 2001; 60 (03) 156-166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Pfeil A, Krojniak L, Renz DM. et al Psoriatic arthritis is associated with bone loss of the metacarpals. Arthritis Res Ther 2016; 18 (01) 248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS.. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957; 16 (04) 494-502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Rettenbacher T, Ennemoser S, Weirich H. et al Diagnostic imaging of gout: comparison of high-resolution US versus conventional X- ray. Eur Radiol 2008; 18 (03) 621-630
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Davies J, Riede P, van Langevelde K. et al Recent developments in advanced imaging in gout. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2019; 11: 1759720X19844429
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Abreu M, Johnson K, Chung CB. et al Calcification in calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) crystalline deposits in the knee: anatomic, radiographic, MR imaging, and histologic study in cadavers. Skeletal Radiol 2004; 33 (07) 392-398
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Andrés M, Sivera F, Pascual E.. Progresses in the imaging of calcium pyrophosphate crystal disease. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2020; 32 (02) 140-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Zhang W, Doherty M, Bardin T. et al European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for calcium pyrophosphate deposition. Part I: terminology and diagnosis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011; 70 (04) 563-570
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Baraliakos X, Fruth M, Kiltz U. et al Entzündliche Wirbelsäulenerkrankungen: axiale Spondyloarthritis. Zentrale Bedeutung der Bildgebung. Z Rheumatol 2017; 76 (02) 149-162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Baraliakos X.. Imaging in axial spondyloarthritis. Isr Med Assoc J 2017; 19 (11) 712-718
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Braun J, Rudwaleit M, Hermann KG. et al Bildgebung bei Spondylitis ankylosans. Z Rheumatol 2007; 66 (02) 167-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 MacKay K, Mack C, Brophy S. et al The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index (BASRI): a new, validated approach to disease assessment. Arthritis Rheum 1998; 41 (12) 2263-2270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Creemers MC, Franssen MJ, van’t Hof MA. et al Assessment of outcome in ankylosing spondylitis: an extended radiographic scoring system. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64 (01) 127-129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Sasiadek MJ, Bladowska J.. Imaging of degenerative spine disease – the state of the art. Adv Clin Exp Med 2012; 21 (02) 133-142
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Raastad J, Reiman M, Coeytaux R. et al The association between lumbar spine radiographic features and low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2015; 44 (05) 571-585
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Hald HJ, Danz B, Schwab R. et al Röntgenologisch nachweisbare Wirbelsäulenveränderungen asymptomatischer junger Männer. Rofo 1995; 163 (01) 4-8
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Emch TM, Modic MT.. Imaging of lumbar degenerative disk disease: history and current state. Skeletal Radiol 2011; 40 (09) 1175-1189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Pfeil A, Lehmann G, Böttcher J. et al Knochendichtemessung in der klinischen Routine. Aktuelle Rheumatologie 2017; 42 (03) 211-216
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Pollähne W, Pfeifer M, Minne HW.. Einsatz bildgebender Verfahren bei der Diagnostik der Osteoporose Interpretation der Röntgenbilder und Messprotokolle der Knochendichte. Wien Med Wochenschr 2007; 157 23–24 593-605
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Genant HK, Li J, Wu CY. et al Vertebral fractures in osteoporosis: a new method for clinical assessment. J Clin Densitom 2000; 3 (03) 281-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Im Internet: http://www.dv-osteologie.org/dvo_leitlinien/dvo-leitlinie-2017 Stand: 31.12.2017
  • 48 Jergas M, Schmid G.. Konventionelle Radiologie der Osteoporose und Röntgenabsorptiometrie. Radiologe 1999; 39 (03) 174-185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Pfeil A, Oelzner P, Bornholdt K. et al Joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis: assessment of a new scoring method. Arthritis Res Ther 2013; 15 (01) R27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Pfeil A, Oelzner P, Renz DM. et al Is there a role for Digital X-ray Radiogrammetry as surrogate marker for radiological progression and imaging of structural integrity in rheumatoid arthritis?. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16: 155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Pfeil A, Nussbaum A, Renz DM. et al Inhibition of periarticular bone loss is associated with clinical remission and ACR70- Response in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int 2019; 39 (04) 637-645
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar