Validity and Reliability of the Isometric Prone Bench Pull Test

Abstract

Isometric strength tests are gaining popularity in recent years. However, no study has validated any isometric strength tests to assess upper body pulling ability. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of isometric prone bench pull. Twenty-three resistance trained athletes (age: 26±4 years, height: 1.75±0.07 m, body mass: 78.6±11.5 kg) were required to perform prone bench pull 1 repetition maximum and isometric prone bench pull tests during the familiarization and actual testing sessions. Isometric prone bench pull was performed at 90^° and 120^° elbow angles. Peak force and rate of force development measures were highly reliable with intra-correlation coefficient between 0.881–0.987. Peak force obtained from isometric prone bench pull at both elbow angles showed large correlations to prone bench pull 1 repetition maximum (r=0.833–0.858, p<0.01). Linear regression equations to predict 1RM performance from isometric prone bench pull peak force produced an estimated 1RM with a standard error of only 3–6% of the average prone bench pull 1 repetition maximum. The current findings show that isometric prone bench pull is a reliable test and can be used to predict prone bench pull performance.

Publication History

Received: 00 00 2020

Accepted: 08 January 2020

Article published online:
14 February 2020

• References

• 1 Bazyler CD, Beckam GK, Sato K. The use of the isometric squat as a measure of strength and explosiveness. J Strength Cond Res 2015; 29: 1386-1392
• 2 Kawamori N, Rossi SJ, Justice BD. et al. Peak force and rate of force development during isometric and dynamic mid-thigh clean pulls performed at various intensities. J Strength Cond Res 2006; 29: 483-491
• 3 Tillin NA, Pain MTG, Folland J. Explosive force production during isometric squats correlates with athletic performance in rugby union players. J Sports Sci 2013; 31: 66-76
• 4 Bellar D, Marcus L, Judge LW. Validation and reliability of a novel test of upper body isometric strength. J Hum Kinet 2015; 47: 189-195
• 5 Uali I, Herrero AJ, Garatachea N. et al. Maximal strength on different resistance training rowing exercises predicts start phase performance in elite kaykers. J Strength Cond Res 2012; 26: 941-946
• 6 Young KP, Haff GG, Newton RU. et al. Assessment and monitoring of ballistic and maximal upper body strength qualities in athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2015; 10: 232-237
• 7 Hornsby WG, Gentles JA, MacDonald CJ. et al. Maximum strength, rate of force development, jump height, and peak power alterations in weightlifters across five months of training. Sports (Basel) 2017; 5: E78
• 8 Wilson GJ, Murphy AJ. Strength diagnosis: the use of test data to determine specific strength training. J Sports Sci 1996; 14: 167-173
• 9 Bartolomei S, Totti V, Griggio F. et al. Upper body resistance exercise reduces time to recover following a high-volume bench press protocol in resistance trained men. J Strength Cond Res 2019; (Published ahead of Print).
• 10 Young W, McLean B, Ardagna J. Relationship between strength qualities and sprinting performance. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1995; 35: 13-19
• 11 Thomas C, Comfort P, Jones PA. et al. A comparison of isometric mid-thigh pull strength, vertical jump, sprint speed, and change-of-direction speed in academy netball players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2017; 12: 916-921
• 12 Murphy AJ, Wilson GJ, Pryor JF. The use of iso-inertial force mass relationship in the prediction of dynamic human performances. Eur J Appl Physiol 1994; 69: 250-257
• 13 Murphy AJ, Wilson GJ, Pryor JF. et al. Isometric assessment of muscular function: the effect of joint angle. J Appl Biomech 1995; 11: 205-215
• 14 Murphy AJ, Wilson GJ. Poor correlation between isometric tests and dynamic performance: relationship to muscle activation. Eur J Appl Physiol 1996; 73: 353-357
• 15 Baker D, Wilson G, Carlyon B. Generality versus specificity: A comparison of dynamic and isometric measures of strength and speed-strength. Eur J Appl Physiol 1994; 68: 350-355
• 16 McKean MR, Burkett B. The influence of upper-body strength on flat-water sprint kayak performance in elite athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2014; 9: 707-714
• 17 Crowley E, Harrison AJ, Lyons M. The impact of resistance training on swimming performance: A systematic review. Sports Med 2017; 47: 2285-2307
• 18 Pearson SN, Cronin JB, Hume PA. et al. Kinematics and kinetics of the bench-press and bench-pull exercises in a strength-trained sporting population. Sports Biomech 2009; 8: 245-254
• 19 Sanchez-Medina L, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ, Perez CE. et al. Velocity- and power-load relationship of the bench pull vs bench press exercises. Int J Sports Med 2014; 35: 209-216
• 20 Zivkovic MZ, Djuric S, Cuk I. et al. Muscle force-velocity relationships Observed in four different functional tests. J Hum Kinet 2017; 56: 39-49
• 21 Akça F. Prediction of rowing ergometer performance from functional anaerobic power, strength and anthropometric components. J Hum Kinet 2014; 41: 133-142
• 22 Garcia-Pallares J, Sanchez-Medina L, Carrasco L. et al. Endurance and neuromuscular changes in world-class level kayakers during a periodized training cycle. Eur J Appl Physiol 2009; 106: 629-638
• 23 Garcia-Pallares J, Sanchez-Medina L, Perez CE. et al. Physiological effects of tapering and detraining in world-class kayakers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010; 42: 1209-1214
• 24 Harriss DJ, Macsween A, Atkinson G. Standards for ethics in sport and exercise science research: 2020 update. Int J Sports Med 2019; 40: 813-817
• 25 Haff GG, Triplett N. (4th ed) Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. Champaign, IL: United States Human Kinetics; 2016
• 26 Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM. et al. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 3-12
• 27 Cortina J. What is coefficient alpha?: An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psych 1993; 78: 98-104
• 28 Blazevich AJ, Gill N, Newton RU. Reliability and validity of two isometric squat tests. J Strength Cond Res 2002; 16: 298-304
• 29 Lieber RL. Skeletal Muscle Structure and Function Baltimore. United States: Williams & Wilkins; 2002
• 30 Murray WM, Delp SL, Buchanan TS. Variation of muscle moment arms with elbow and forearm positions. J Biomech 1995; 28: 513-525
• 31 Murray WM, Buchanan TS, Delp SL. Scaling of peak moment arms of elbow muscles with upper extremity bone dimensions. J Biomech 2002; 35: 19-26
• 32 Hewit JK, Jaffe DA, Crowder T. A comparison of muscle activation during the pull-up and three alternative pulling exercises. J Phy Fit Treatment & Sports 2018; 5
• 33 Kim YS, Kim DY, Ha MS. Effect of the push-up exercise at different palmar width on muscle activities. J Phys Ther Sci 2016; 28: 446-449