Download PDF
Z Orthop Unfall 2022; 160(02): 229-248
DOI: 10.1055/a-0968-9792
CME-Fortbildung

Evidenz in der infiltrativen Schmerztherapie des Bewegungsapparates

Paradigmenwechsel zur sonografisch gesteuerten InterventionEvidence in Infiltrative Pain Therapy of the Musculoskeletal System
Gerhard M. Hobusch
,
Hannes Platzgummer
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Correction to:

Erratum: Evidenz in der infiltrativen Schmerztherapie des BewegungsapparatesZ Orthop Unfall 2022; 160(02): e3-e3
DOI: 10.1055/a-1766-3112

Zusammenfassung

Durch ultraschallgezielte therapeutische Infiltrationen können Wirkstoffe in kleinen Mengen exakt an den anatomischen Ort des Schmerzgeschehens gebracht werden. Einen Überblick über die wissenschaftliche Evidenz unterschiedlicher Infiltrationsverfahren soll dieser Artikel geben.

Abstract

Musculoskeletal pain symptoms frequently generate limitations in daily work and life in many patients. Usually, symptomatic treatment is possible before clarifying the in depth diagnosis. A symptom-based infiltration therapy will never replace a thoroughly done physical examination and thoughtful collection of patient history, however, it can be of great benefit for the patient when done focused on the point of pain and executed with profound anatomical knowledge. Furthermore, the knowledge of the level of evidence of therapeutic infiltrations improves their outcomes and shapes realistic patientsʼ expectations. Ultrasound-guided therapeutic infiltrations improve the outcome despite the use of lower amounts of active agents by pinpointed applications. This article provides an overview of the scientific evidence of effectiveness of (ultrasound-guided) infiltration techniques in diverse musculoskeletal regions.

Kernaussagen

  • Beschwerden des Bewegungs- und Stützapparates können oft durch eine symptombasierte Infiltrationstherapie behandelt werden.

  • Durch ultraschallgesteuerte therapeutische Infiltrationen können analgetisch wirksame Substanzen in kleinen Mengen exakt an den anatomischen Ort des Schmerzgeschehens gebracht werden.

  • Zum Einsatz kommen u. a. Lokalanästhetika, Steroide, autologes Blut und Blutprodukte und Salzlösung.

  • Zwei klassische Strategien der Nadelvisualisierung durch Ultraschall sind in der Literatur beschrieben:

    • Beim In-Plane-Ansatz verläuft die Nadel parallel zur Schallsondenausrichtung und wird dementsprechend als Linie im Bild angezeigt.

    • Beim Out-of-Plane-Ansatz liegt die Schallsonde im rechten Winkel zum Nadelverlauf, die Nadel wird als Einzelpunkt im Bild angezeigt.

  • Schmerzen an der Wirbelsäule können durch die Infiltrationstherapie ebenso behandelt werden wie Sakroiliakalgelenkschmerzen, Schmerzen an der oberen (Schultergürtel, Ellenbogengelenk, Handgelenk/Hand) wie auch der unteren Extremität (Hüfte, Kniegelenk, Sprunggelenk, Fuß).

  • Es bestehen unterschiedliche Evidenzlevel in den verschiedenen Lokalisationen und auch in Abhängigkeit von den eingesetzten Substanzen.

  • Bei Einhaltung der Hygieneschutzmaßnahmen handelt es sich um ein sehr sicheres Verfahren.

  • Bei der Indikationsstellung zu diagnostischen Infiltrationen sollten sich Konsequenzen für die weitere Behandlung ergeben.

Schlüsselwörter

Lokalanästhetikum - Schmerztherapie - Analgesie - evidenzbasierte Medizin

Key words

Local anesthetic - pain therapy - analgesia - evidence-based medicine


Publication History

Article published online:
10 February 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Klimont J, Baldaszti E. Österreichische Gesundheitsbefragung 2014, Hauptergebnisse des Austrian Health Interview Service (ATHIS). Im Internet (Stand: 28.01.2021): https://broschuerenservice.sozialministerium.at/Home/Download?publicationId=542
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Techniker Krankenkasse. Gesundheitsreport der Techniker Krankenkasse. 1–182 (2014). Im Internet (Stand: 02.11.2020): https://www.tk.de/resource/blob/2026674/0bfaf051cdda30d3c827e983e7baddc6/gesundheitsreport-2014-data.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M. et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012; 380: 2163-2196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin – baua. Volkswirtschaftliche Kosten durch Arbeitsunfähigkeit 2018. Im Internet (Stand: 02.11.2020): https://www.baua.de/DE/Themen/Arbeitswelt-und-Arbeitsschutz-im-Wandel/Arbeitsweltberichterstattung/Kosten-der-AU/pdf/Kosten-2018.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Vargas-Schaffer G. Is the WHO analgesic ladder still valid? Twenty-four years of experience. Can Fam Physician 2010; 56: 514-517 e202–e205
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ramanayake RPJC, Basnayake BMTK. Evaluation of red flags minimizes missing serious diseases in primary care. J Family Med Prim Care 2018; 7: 315-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bannuru RR, Natov NS, Dasi UR. et al. Therapeutic trajectory following intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection in knee osteoarthritis – meta-analysis. Osteoarthr Cartil 2011; 19: 611-619
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Morath O, Kubosch EJ, Taeymans J. et al. The effect of sclerotherapy and prolotherapy on chronic painful Achilles tendinopathy-a systematic review including meta-analysis. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2018; 28: 4-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Di Matteo B, Filardo G, Kon E. et al. Platelet-rich plasma: evidence for the treatment of patellar and Achilles tendinopathy – a systematic review. Musculoskelet Surg 2015; 99: 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Bisset L, Beller E, Jull G. et al. Mobilisation with movement and exercise, corticosteroid injection, or wait and see for tennis elbow: randomised trial. BMJ 2006; 333: 939
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Arroll B, Goodyear-Smith F. Corticosteroid injections for painful shoulder: a meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2005; 55: 224-228
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Yui JC, Preskill C, Greenlund LS. Arthrocentesis and joint injection in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants. Mayo Clin Proc 2017; 92: 1223-1226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 McGarry JG, Daruwalla ZJ. The efficacy, accuracy and complications of corticosteroid injections of the knee joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19: 1649-1654
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jayaram P, Kennedy DJ, Yeh P. et al. Chondrotoxic effects of local anesthetics on human knee articular cartilage: a systematic review. PM R 2019; 11: 379-400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Brinks A, Koes BW, Volkers AC. et al. Adverse effects of extra-articular corticosteroid injections: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11: 206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Pattrick M, Doherty M. Facial flushing after intra-articular injection of steroid. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987; 295: 1380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Stepan JG, London DA, Boyer MI. et al. Blood glucose levels in diabetic patients following corticosteroid injections into the hand and wrist. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39: 706-712
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Filippucci E, Farina A, Carotti M. et al. Grey scale and power Doppler sonographic changes induced by intra-articular steroid injection treatment. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 740-743
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Zeng C, Lane NE, Hunter DJ. et al. Intra-articular corticosteroids and the risk of knee osteoarthritis progression: results from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Osteoarthrit Cartil 2019; 27: 855-862
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Singla V, Batra YK, Bharti N. et al. Steroid vs. Platelet-rich plasma in ultrasound-guided sacroiliac joint injection for chronic low back pain. Pain Pract 2017; 17: 782-791
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Cole BJ, Karas V, Hussey K. et al. Hyaluronic acid versus platelet-rich plasma: a prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes and effects on intra-articular biology for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med 2017; 45: 339-346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 del Cura JL, Torre I, Zabala R. et al. Sonographically guided percutaneous needle lavage in calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: short- and long-term results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189: W128-W134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ehlert D, Majjhoo A. Traumeel® epidural injection: a viable alternative to corticosteroids – a five-patient case study. Cureus 2019; 11: e6196
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Vanden Bossche L, Vanderstraeten G. A multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial protocol to assess Traumeel injection vs. dexamethasone injection in rotator cuff syndrome: the TRAumeel in ROtator cuff syndrome (TRARO) study protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16: 8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Santamato A, Micello MF, Valeno G. et al. Ultrasound-guided injection of botulinum toxin type a for piriformis muscle syndrome: a case report and review of the literature. Toxins 2015; 7: 3045-3056
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Lin Y-C, Wu W-T, Hsu Y-C. et al. Comparative effectiveness of botulinum toxin versus non-surgical treatments for treating lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil 2018; 32: 131-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 AWMF. Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Kreuzschmerz. Registernummer nvl – 007. Im Internet (Stand: 14.01.2021): https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/nvl-007.html
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Sconfienza LM, Adriaensen M, Albano D. et al. Clinical indications for image-guided interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi-based consensus paper from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)-part I, shoulder. Eur Radiol 2020; 30: 903-913
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Finnoff JT, Hall MM, Adams E. et al. American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM) position statement: interventional musculoskeletal ultrasound in sports medicine. Br J Sports Med 2015; 49: 145-150
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Daniels EW, Cole D, Jacobs B. et al. Existing evidence on ultrasound-guided injections in sports medicine. Orthop J Sports Med 2018; 6: 2325967118756576
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Müller T, Martiny H, Merz E. et al. DEGUM Recommendations on infection prevention in ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound. Ultraschall Med 2018; 39: 284-303
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Narouze SN. ed. Atlas of ultrasound-guided Procedures in interventional Pain Management, 2nd. ed. New York: Springer; 2018
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Bundesministerium für Soziales, Gesundheit, Pflege und Konsumentenschutz. Leitlinie Kreuzschmerz 2018. Im Internet (Stand: 02.11.2020): https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Gesundheit/Gesundheitssystem/Gesundheitssystem-und-Qualitaetssicherung/Qualitaetsstandards/Leitlinie-Kreuzschmerz-2018.html
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Cassidy JD, Côté P, Carroll LJ. et al. Incidence and course of low back pain episodes in the general population. Spine 2005; 30: 2817-2823
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Henschke N, Kuijpers T, Rubinstein SM. et al. Injection therapy and denervation procedures for chronic low-back pain: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 2010; 19: 1425-1449
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Staal JB, de Bie R, de Vet HC. et al. Injection therapy for subacute and chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (03) CD001824
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Silbergleit R, Mehta BA, Sanders WP. et al. Imaging-guided injection techniques with fluoroscopy and CT for spinal pain management. Radiographics 2001; 21: 927-939 discussion 940–942
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Küllmer K, Rompe JD, Löwe A. et al. [Ultrasound image of the lumbar spine and the lumbosacral transition. Ultrasound anatomy and possibilities for ultrasonically-controlled facet joint infiltration]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1997; 135: 310-314
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Loizides A, Peer S, Plaikner M. et al. Ultrasound-guided injections in the lumbar spine. Med Ultrason 2011; 13: 54-58
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Obernauer J, Galiano K, Gruber H. et al. Ultrasound-guided versus Computed Tomography-controlled facet joint injections in the middle and lower cervical spine: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Med Ultrason 2013; 15: 10-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Ohrndorf S, Naumann L, Grundey J. et al. Is musculoskeletal ultrasonography an operator-dependent method or a fast and reliably teachable diagnostic tool? Interreader agreements of three ultrasonographers with different training levels. Int J Rheumatol 2010; 2010: 164518
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Greher M, Scharbert G, Kamolz LP. et al. Ultrasound-guided lumbar facet nerve block: a sonoanatomic study of a new methodologic approach. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 1242-1248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Smith MD. Cervical radiculopathy: causes and surgical treatment. Minnesota Med 1995; 78: 28-30 42–45
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 MacMahon PJ, Huang AJ, Palmer WE. Spine Injectables: what is the safest cocktail?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 207: 526-533
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Bogduk N. The sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain. Spine 1995; 20: 31-37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Vanelderen P, Szadek K, Cohen SP. et al. 13. Sacroiliac joint pain. Pain Pract 2010; 10: 470-478
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Klauser A, De Zordo T, Feuchtner G. et al. Feasibility of ultrasound-guided sacroiliac joint injection considering sonoanatomic landmarks at two different levels in cadavers and patients. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 59: 1618-1624
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Stelzer W, Stelzer D, Stelzer E. et al. Success rate of intra-articular sacroiliac joint injection: fluoroscopy vs. ultrasound guidance-a cadaveric study. Pain Med 2019; 20: 1890-1897
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA. et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004; 328: 1490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Jacob AK, Sallay PI. Therapeutic efficacy of corticosteroid injections in the acromioclavicular joint. Biomed Sci Instrum 1997; 34: 380-385
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Wang W, Shi M, Zhou C. et al. Effectiveness of corticosteroid injections in adhesive capsulitis of shoulder: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96: e7529
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Gross C, Dhawan A, Harwood D. et al. Glenohumeral joint injections: a review. Sports Health 2013; 5: 153-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Lapègue F, André A, Meyrignac O. et al. US-guided percutaneous release of the trigger finger by using a 21-gauge needle: a prospective study of 60 cases. Radiology 2016; 280: 493-499
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Oh JK, Messing S, Hyrien O. et al. Effectiveness of corticosteroid injections for treatment of de quervainʼs tenosynovitis. Hand (NY) 2017; 12: 357-361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Marshall S, Tardif G, Ashworth N. Local corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (02) CD001554
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 McCabe PS, Maricar N, Parkes MJ. et al. The efficacy of intra-articular steroids in hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Osteoarthr Cartil 2016; 24: 1509-1517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Krych AJ, Griffith TB, Hudgens JL. et al. Limited therapeutic benefits of intra-articular cortisone injection for patients with femoro-acetabular impingement and labral tear. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22: 750-755
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Brennan KL, Allen BC, Maldonado YM. dry needling versus cortisone injection in the treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome: a noninferiority randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017; 47: 232-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Bellamy N, Campbell J, Robinson V. et al. Intraarticular corticosteroid for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (02) CD005328
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Lin K-Y, Yang C-C, Hsu C-J. et al. Intra-articular Injection of platelet-rich plasma is superior to hyaluronic acid or saline solution in the treatment of mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind, triple-parallel, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Arthroscopy 2019; 35: 106-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Smith PA. Intra-articular autologous conditioned plasma injections provide safe and efficacious treatment for knee osteoarthritis: An FDA-sanctioned, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44: 884-891
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Grice J, Marsland D, Smith G. et al. Efficacy of foot and ankle corticosteroid injections. Foot Ankle Int 2017; 38: 8-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Chen C-M, Lee M, Lin C-H. et al. Comparative efficacy of corticosteroid injection and non-invasive treatments for plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 2033
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Matthews BG, Hurn SE, Harding MP. et al. The effectiveness of non-surgical interventions for common plantar digital compressive neuropathy (Mortonʼs neuroma): a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res 2019; 12: 12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Ruiz Santiago F, Prados Olleta N, Tomás Muñoz P. et al. Short term comparison between blind and ultrasound guided injection in morton neuroma. Eur Radiol 2019; 29: 620-627
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar