Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2019; 128(04): 171-178
DOI: 10.1055/a-0872-9267
Fortbildung | Implantologie
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Wiederherstellung einer komplex atrophierten Freiendsituation mittels individualisierten Titangitters (ReOss®) zur festsitzenden implantatprothetischen Versorgung

Alexander Volkmann
,
Irene Göllnitz
,
Amely Hartmann
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 May 2019 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zum Ersatz von verloren gegangenen Zähnen haben sich Implantate sehr gut bewährt [1]. Insbesondere nach langer Zahnlosigkeit, nach Explantation oder nach Trauma ist das Knochenangebot für eine Implantation häufig nicht geeignet. Die funktionellen und ästhetischen Standards für eine prothetische Versorgung sind dann häufig nicht gewährleistet. Zudem korrelieren der Langzeiterfolg und die Stabilität der Implantate mit der Quantität und Qualität des Knochenangebots [2]. Aufgrund dessen sind Augmentationen bei einer ausgeprägten Knochendefektsituation vor einer Implantation häufig unvermeidbar. Dabei stellen horizontale und insbesondere vertikale Knochendefekte eine Herausforderung für den behandelnden Zahnarzt oder Chirurgen dar.
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Moraschini V, Poubel LA, Ferreira VF. et al. Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 44: 377-388
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Al-Nawas B, Schiegnitz E. Augmentation procedures using bone substitute materials or autogenous bone – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Oral Implantol 2014; 7 (Suppl. 02) S219-S234
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Boyne PJ. Restoration of osseous defects in maxillofacial casualities. J Am Dent Assoc 1969; 78: 767-776
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Seiler M, Kaemmerer PW, Peetz M. et al. Customized Titanium Lattice Structure in Three-Dimensional Alveolar Defect: An Initial Case Letter. J Oral Implantol 2018; 44: 219-224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Seiler M, Peetz M, Hartmann A. et al. Individualized CAD/CAM-produced titanium scaffold for alveolar bone augmentation: a retrospective analysis of dehiscence events in relation to demographic and surgical parameters. J Oral Science Rehabilitation 2018; 4: 38-46
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Simion M, Dahlin C, Rocchietta I. et al. Vertical ridge augmentation with guided bone regeneration in association with dental implants: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 86-94
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Buser D, Halbritter S, Hart C. et al. Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 152-162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Tinti C, Parma-Benfenati S, Manfrini F. Spacemaking metal structures for nonresorbable membranes in guided bone regeneration around implants. Two case reports. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997; 17: 53-61
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Parma-Benfenati S, Roncati M, Galletti P. et al. Resorbable dome device and guided bone regeneration: an alternative bony defect treatment around implants. A case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2014; 34: 749-755
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Merli M, Moscatelli M, Mariotti G. et al. Bone level variation after vertical ridge augmentation: resorbable barriers versus titanium-reinforced barriers. A 6-year double-blind randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 905-913
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Moura RV, Kojima AN, Saraceni CHC. et al. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Impression Techniques for Implant Restorations. J Prosthodont 2019; 28: e530-e535
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ciocca L, Ragazzini S, Fantini M. et al. Work flow for the prosthetic rehabilitation of atrophic patients with a minimal-intervention CAD/CAM approach. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114: 22-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Sumida T, Otawa N, Kamata YU. et al. Custom-made titanium devices as membranes for bone augmentation in implant treatment: Clinical application and the comparison with conventional titanium mesh. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015; 43: 2183-2188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Vrielinck L, Sun Y, Schepers S. et al. Osseous reconstruction using an occlusive titanium membrane following marginal mandibulectomy: proof of principle. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25: 1112-1114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Rasia-dal Polo M, Poli PP, Rancitelli D. et al. Alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium meshes: a systematic review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2014; 19: e639-e646
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Roccuzzo M, Ramieri G, Bunino M. et al. Autogenous bone graft alone or associated with titanium mesh for vertical alveolar ridge augmentation: a controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 286-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Aytac S, Ozbek S, Kahveci R. et al. Titanium mesh fracture in mandibular reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2005; 16: 1120-1122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lindfors LT, Tervonen EA, Sandor GK. et al. Guided bone regeneration using a titanium-reinforced ePTFE membrane and particulate autogenous bone: the effect of smoking and membrane exposure. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109: 825-830
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Keestra JA, Barry O, Jong L. et al. Long-term effects of vertical bone augmentation: a systematic review. J Appl Oral Sci 2016; 24: 3-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Misch CM. Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12: 767-776
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hammerle CH, Karring T. Guided bone regeneration at oral implant sites. Periodontology 2000 1998; 17: 151-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Simion M, Baldoni M, Zaffe D. Jawbone enlargement using immediate implant placement associated with a split-crest technique and guided tissue regeneration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992; 12: 462-473
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Oda T, Sawaki Y, Ueda M. Experimental alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis using a simple device that permits secondary implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 95-102
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Chappuis V, Cavusoglu Y, Buser D. et al. Lateral Ridge Augmentation Using Autogenous Block Grafts and Guided Bone Regeneration: A 10-Year Prospective Case Series Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2017; 19: 85-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Rasia-dal Polo M, Poli PP, Rancitelli D. et al. Alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium meshes: a systematic review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2014; 19: e639-e646
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P. et al. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants – a Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2009; 2: 167-184
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Canullo L, Trisi P, Simion M. Vertical ridge augmentation around implants using e-PTFE titanium-reinforced membrane and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (bio-oss): A case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 355-361
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Volkmann A, Göllnitz I. Eine individualisierte 3D-gedruckte Lösung für komplexe Knochenaugmentationen: Rekonstruktion von komplexen Knochendefekten mit CAD/CAM-designten und -gefertigten Titangittern. Dentale Implantologie und Parotontologie 2018.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Sagheb K, Schiegnitz E, Moergel M. et al. Clinical outcome of alveolar ridge augmentation with individualized CAD-CAM-produced titanium mesh. Int J Implant Dent 2017; 3: 36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Pellegrino G, Lizio G, Corinaldesi G. et al. Titanium Mesh Technique in Rehabilitation of Totally Edentulous Atrophic Maxillae: A Retrospective Case Series. J Periodontol 2016; 87: 519-528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Seiler M, Peetz M, Hartmann A. et al. Individualized CAD/CAM-produced titanium scaffold for alveolar bone augmentation: a retrospective analysis of dehiscence events in relation to demographic and surgical parameters. J Oral Science Rehabilitation 2018; 4: 38-46
    PubMedGoogle Scholar