Der Klinikarzt 2018; 47(11): 508-511
DOI: 10.1055/a-0773-1818
Schwerpunkt
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Angina pectoris bei Männern und Frauen

Verschiedenheiten und Gemeinsamkeiten
Peter Ong
Zentrum für Innere Medizin III, Abteilung für Kardiologie, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Stuttgart
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 December 2018 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Die Angina pectoris ist das Kardinalsymptom für eine myokardiale Ischämie. Zu den wichtigen Pathomechanismen für eine myokardiale Ischämie gehören die stenosierende koronare Herzkrankheit (KHK) bzw. die Koronarthrombose beim akuten Myokardinfarkt, Koronarspasmen und eine koronare mikrovaskuläre Dysfunktion. Wichtige Unterschiede zwischen Männern und Frauen liegen in der Art der Beschwerden, der Beschreibung der Symptome und der subjektiven Einschätzung der Beschwerden.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Heberden W. Some account of a disorder of the breast. Medical Transactions of the Royal College of Physicians 1772; 2: 59-67
  • 2 Task Force Members. Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S. et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 2949-3003
  • 3 Adlam D, Alfonso F, Maas A. et al. European Society of Cardiology, acute cardiovascular care association, SCAD study group: a position paper on spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 3353-3368
  • 4 Crea F, Camici PG, Bairey Merz CN. Coronary microvascular dysfunction: an update. Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 1101-1111
  • 5 Campeau L. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading of angina pectoris revisited 30 years later. Can J Cardiol 2002; 18: 371-379
  • 6 Arnold SV, Grodzinsky A, Gosch KL. et al. Predictors of Physician Under-Recognition of Angina in Outpatients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2016; 9: 554-559
  • 7 Hemingway H, Langenberg C, Damant J. et al. Prevalence of angina in women versus men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of international variations across 31 countries. Circulation 2008; 117: 1526-1536
  • 8 Vermeltfoort IA, Raijmakers PG, Riphagen II. et al. Definitions and incidence of cardiac syndrome X: review and analysis of clinical data. Clin Res Cardiol 2010; 99: 475-481
  • 9 Russo G, Di Franco A, Lamendola P. et al. Lack of effect of nitrates on exercise stress test results in patients with microvascular angina. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2013; 27: 229-234
  • 10 Ong P, Camici PG, Beltrame JF. et al. Coronary Vasomotion Disorders International Study Group (COVADIS). International standardization of diagnostic criteria for microvascular angina. Int J Cardiol 2018; 250: 16-20
  • 11 Ong P, Athanasiadis A, Sechtem U. Pharmacotherapy for coronary microvascular dysfunction. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother 2015; 1: 65-71
  • 12 Shaw LJ, Merz CN, Pepine CJ. et al. Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Investigators. The economic burden of angina in women with suspected ischemic heart disease: results from the National Institutes of Health--National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute--sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation. Circulation 2006; 114: 894-904
  • 13 Kyker KA, Limacher MC. Gender differences in the presentation and symptoms of coronary artery disease. Curr Womens Health Rep 2002; 2: 115-119
  • 14 Nugent L, Mehta PK, Bairey Merz CN. Gender and microvascular angina. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2011; 31: 37-46
  • 15 Hiteshi AK, Li D, Gao Y. et al. Gender differences in coronary artery diameter are not related to body habitus or left ventricular mass. Clin Cardiol 2014; 37: 605-609
  • 16 Regitz-Zagrosek V. Sex and gender differences in symptoms of myocardial ischaemia. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 3064-3066
  • 17 Vodopiutz J, Poller S, Schneider B. et al. Chest pain in hospitalized patients: cause-specific and gender-specific differences. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2002; 11: 719-727
  • 18 Weissler-Snir A, Kornowski R, Sagie A. et al. Gender Differences in Left Ventricular Function Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for First Anterior Wall ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Am J Cardiol 2014; 114: 1473-1478
  • 19 GenCAD: Gender-specific mechanisms in coronary artery disease in Europe (2018). Im Internet: https://eupha.org/gencad Stand: 04.08.2018
  • 20 Taqueti VR, Di Carli MF. Coronary Microvascular Disease Pathogenic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Options. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 72: 2625-2641