Transkranielle elektrische Stimulation und ihre Bedeutung
                    in der Neurorehabilitation

Friedhelm C. Hummel

doi:10.1055/a-0754-3214

neuroreha, Table of Contents

neuroreha 2018; 10(04): 167-172
DOI: 10.1055/a-0754-3214

Schwerpunkt

Transkranielle elektrische Stimulation und ihre Bedeutung in der Neurorehabilitation

Friedhelm C. Hummel

Abstract

Zusammenfassung

Jährlich treten ca. 1,5 Mio. neue Schlaganfälle in Europa auf. Trotz Weiterentwicklung der Akutbehandlung mit flächendeckenden Stroke Units, Thrombolyse und Thrombektomie und der postakuten Neurorehabilitation erholt sich immer noch nur ein Teil der Patienten. Seit etwas mehr als 10 Jahren wird transkranielle elektrische Stimulation eingesetzt, um residuale Funktion und funktionelle Erholung nach Schlaganfall zu verbessern. Der folgende Übersichtsartikel fokussiert auf Limitationen, Herausforderungen und Chancen dieser Methodik.

Full Text

References

Literatur
1 Antal A. et al. Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol 2017; 128 (09) 1774-1809
2 Di Pino G. et al. Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: A novel model for neurorehabilitation. Nat Rev Neurol 2014; 10: 597-608
3 Draaisma LR, Wessel MJ, Hummel FC. Non-invasive brain stimulation to enhancecognitive rehabilitation after stroke. Neurosci Lett. 06/2018
4 Elsner B, Kugler J, Pohl M. et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving function and activities of daily living in patients after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 11: CD009645
5 Elsner B, Kugler J, Pohl M. et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in patients with aphasia after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 5: CD009760
6 Feigin VL. et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet Lond Engl 2014; 383 (9913) 245-254
7 Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Drivers of brain plasticity. Curr Opin Neurol 2005; 18: 667-674
8 Hummel F. et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain 2005; 128: 490-499
9 Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Non-invasive brain stimulation: A new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke?. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 708-712
10 Hummel FC. et al. Controversy: Noninvasive and invasive cortical stimulation show efficacy in treating stroke patients. Brain Stimulat 2008; 1: 370-382
11 Kang N, Summers JJ, Cauraugh JH. Transcranial direct current stimulationfacilitates motor learning post-stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J NeurolNeurosurg Psychiatry. 08/2015
12 Kashiwagi FT. et al. Noninvasive brain stimulations for unilateral spatial neglect after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials. Neural Plast 2018; 2018 (Jun) 1-25
13 Koch PJ, Hummel FC. Toward precision medicine: Tailoring interventional strategies based on noninvasive brain stimulation for motor recovery after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol 2017; 30 (04) 388-397
14 Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW. et al. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: A randomised trial. The Lancet 1999; 354 (9174) 191-196
15 Lefaucheur JP. et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol 2014; 125: 2150-2206
16 Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu LL. et al. Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Neurology 2010; 75: 2176-2184
17 Marangolo P. The potential effects of transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS) on language functioning: Combining neuromodulation and behavioral intervention inaphasia. Neurosci Lett. 12/2017
18 Morishita T, Hummel FC. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) in motor recovery after stroke: Concepts to increase efficacy. Curr Behav Neurosc Rep 2017; 4 (03) 280-289
19 Nicolo P, Ptak R, Guggisberg AG. Variability of behavioural responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation: Origins and predictors. Neuropsychologia 2015; 74: 137-144
20 O’Brien AT, Bertolucci F, Torrealba-Acosta G. et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation for fine motor improvement after stroke: A meta-analysis. Eur J Neurol 2018; 25 (08) 1017-1026
21 Opitz A, Windhoff M, Heidemann RM. et al. How the brain tissue shapes the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. NeuroImage 2011; 58 (03) 849-859
22 Opitz A, Yeagle E, Thielscher A. et al. On the importance of precise electrode placement for targeted transcranial electric stimulation. NeuroImage 2018; 181: 560-567
23 Platz T. Repetitive transkranielle Magnetstimulation (rTMS) – eine Therapieoption für Schlaganfall-Betroffene?. Neuroreha 2018; 10 (04) 174-177
24 Raffin E, Hummel FC. Restoring motor functions after stroke: Multiple approaches and opportunities. The Neuroscientist 2018; 24 (04) 400-416
25 Rocha S. et al. The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) on upper limb function in chronic stroke: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil 2016; 38 (07) 653-660
26 Ruffini G, Fox MD, Ripolles O. et al. Optimization of multifocal transcranial current stimulation for weighted cortical pattern targeting from realistic modeling of electric fields. Neuroimage 89: 216-25 04/2014;
27 Schulz R. et al. Parietofrontal motor pathways and their association with motor function after stroke. Brain 2015; 138: 1949-1960
28 Schulz R. et al. Cortico-cerebellar structural connectivity is related toresidual motor output in chronic stroke. Cereb Cortex. 2017
29 Shaheiwola N, Zhang B, Jia J. et al. Using tDCS as an add-on treatment prior to FES therapy in improving upper limb function in severe chronic stroke patients: A randomized controlled study. Front Hum Neurosci 06/2018; 12
30 Stagg CJ, Antal A, Nitsche MA. Physiology of transcranial direct current stimulation. J ECT 06/2018; 1
31 To WT, Hart J, De Ridder D. et al. Considering the influence of stimulation parameters on the effect of conventional and high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation. Expert Rev Med Devices 2016; 13 (04) 391-404
32 Van de Winckel A, Carey JR, Bisson TA. et al. Home-based transcranial direct current stimulation plus tracking training therapy in people with stroke: An open-label feasibility study. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil 2018; 15 (01) 83
33 Winters C, van Wegen EEH, Daffertshofer A. et al. Generalizability of the proportional recovery model for the upper extremity after an ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2015; 29 (07) 614-622