Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2018; 127(10): 495-501
DOI: 10.1055/a-0736-6466
Fortbildung | Implantologie
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Vollkeramik auf Implantaten – geht das?

Stabilität und Ästhetik implantologischer Prothetikkonzepte im Fokus des Keramiksymposiums
Anja Zembic
,
Vincent Fehmer
,
Manfred Kern
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
30 October 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Vollkeramische Werkstoffe haben sich seit geraumer Zeit als adäquate Alternative für die Versorgung mit Kronen und Brücken qualifiziert. Dies unterstützt die DGZMK mit der „S3-Leitlinie Vollkeramische Kronen und Brücken“ mittels evidenzgestützter Studienergebnisse und testiert, dass die klinische Bewährung wesentlich vom Einsatzbereich, von den verwendeten Werkstoffen und von der Einhaltung materialspezifischer Anforderungen abhängt [1].
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Meyer G, Ahsbahs S, Kern M. et al. Vollkeramische Kronen und Brücken, S3-Leitlinie, AWMF Reg.Nr. 083-012, Ergebnisse der DGPro Konsensus-Konferenzen. DGZMK 2013/2014. Zahnärztl Mitteil 2015; 7: 50-55
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Jung RE, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE. et al. Systematic review of the survival rate and the insidence of biological, technical, and aestehtic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23 (Suppl. 06) 2-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Brägger U, Aeschlimann S, Bürgin W. et al. Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FDP) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function. Clin Oral Implant Res 2001; 12: 26-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Pjetursson BE, Brägger U, Lang NP. et al. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental protheses (FDP) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18 (Suppl. 03) 97-113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hämmerle CH, Wagner D, Brägger U. et al. Threshold of tactile sensitivity perceived with dental endosseous implants and natural teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6: 83-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Pjetursson BE, Thoma D, Jung RE. et al. A systematic review of the survival rate and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23 (Suppl. 06) 22-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M. et al. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1752-1754
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Jung YS, Lee JW, Choi YJ. et al. A study on the in-vitro wear of the natural tooth structure by opposing zirconia or dental porcelain. J Adv Prosthodont 2010; 2: 111-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Stawarczyk B, Özcan M, Schmutz F. et al. Two-body wear of monolithic, veneered and glazed zirconia and their corresponding enamel antagonists. Acta Odontol Scand 2013; 71: 102-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Stober T, Bermejo JL, Rammelsberg P. et al. Enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns after 6 months of clinical use. J Oral Rehabil 2014; 41: 314-322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Abdulmajeed AA, Lim KG, Närhi TO. et al. Complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review. J Prosthet Den 2016; 115: 672-677
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Spies BC, Balmer M, Patzelt SB. et al. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of a zirconia oral implant: Three-year results of a prospective cohort investigation. J Dent Res 2015; 94: 1385-1391
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Pieralli S, Kohal RJ, Jung RE. et al. Clinical outcomes of zirconia dental implants: A systematic review. J Dent Res 2017; 96: 38-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Spies BC, Witkowski S, Butz F. et al. Bi-layered zirconia/fluor-apatite bridges supported by ceramic dental implants: A prospective case series after thirty months of observation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 27: 1265-1273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Passos SP, Linke B, Larjava H. et al. Performance of zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth crowns in esthetic areas: A retrospective study up to 12-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 27: 47-54
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Stimmelmayr M, Heiß P, Erdelt K. et al. Fracture resistance of different implant abutments supporting all-ceramic single crowns after aging. Int J Compu Dent 2017; 20: 53-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hopp M, Moss C. Hybrid-Abutments – Möglichkeiten der Herstellung. Zahn Prax 2011; 14: 200-207
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Zembic A, Philipp AO, Hämmerle CH. et al. Eleven-year follow-up of a prospective study of zirconia implant abutments supporting single all-ceramic crowns in anterior and premolar regions. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17 (Suppl. 02) 417-626
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Zembic A, Sailer I, Jung RE. et al. Randomized controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for single-tooth implants in canine and posterior regions – 3-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 802-808
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Zembic A, Kim S, Zwahlen M. et al. Systematic review of the survival rate and incidence of biologic, technical, and esthetic complications of single implant abutments supporting fixed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29 (Suppl.) 99-116
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Sailer I, Philipp A, Zembic A. et al. A systematic review of the performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20 (Suppl. 04) 4-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Sailer I, Zembic A, Jung RE. et al. Single-tooth implant reconstructions: Esthetic factors influencing the decision between titanium and zirconia abutments in anterior regions. Eur J Esthet Dent 2007; 2: 296-310
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Rinke S. Anterior all-ceramic superstructures – chance or risk?. Quintessence Int 2015; 46: 289-302
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Gehrke P, Johannson D, Fischer C. et al. In-vitro fatigue and fracture resistance of one- and two-piece CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015; 30: 546-554
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ekfeldt A, Fürst B, Carlsson GE. Zirconia abutments for single-tooth implant restorations: a 10 to 11-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017; 28: 1303-1308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Güncü MB, Cakan U, Aktas G. et al. Comparison of implant vs. tooth-supported zirconia-based single crowns in a split-mouth design: a 4-year clinical follow-up study. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20: 2467-2473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Bömicke W, Rammelsberg P, Stöber T. et al. Short-term prospective clinical evaluation of monolithic and partly veneered zirconia single crowns. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016; 29: 22-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Rinke S, Lattke A, Eickholz P. et al. Practice-based clinical evaluation of zirconia abutments for anterior single-tooth restorations. Quintessence Int 2015; 46: 19-29
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Wittneben JG, Millen C, Brägger U. Clinical performance of screw vs. cement-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions – a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 39 (Suppl.) 84-98
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Wang JH, Judge R, Bailey D. Five-year retrospective assay of implant treatments and complications in private practice. Restorative treatment profiles of single and short-span implant-supported fixed prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 2016; 29: 372-380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Hahnel S. Vollkeramische implantat-getragene Versorgungen – State of the Art?. Wissen Kompakt 2017; 11: 55-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Larsson C, Vult von Steyern P. Five-year follow-up of implant-supported Y-TZP and ZTA fixed dental prostheses. A randomized, prospective clinical trial comparing two different material systems. Int J Prosthodont 2010; 23: 555-561
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Zembic A, Bösch A, Jung RE. et al. Five-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing zirconia and titanium abutments supporting single-implant crowns in canine and posterior regions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 384-390
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar