Minimalinvasive Therapie koronaler karies- und nicht kariesbedingter Defekte

Karies stellt nach wie vor die häufigste Erkrankung der Zahnhartsubstanz dar. In der täglichen Praxis werden zunehmend jedoch auch nicht kariöse Defekte beobachtet. Der Artikel stellt minimalinvasive Therapieansätze zur Versorgung kariöser und nicht kariöser Defekte verschiedenster Ursache vor. Beleuchtet werden die Hintergründe sowie Vor- und Nachteile der jeweiligen Therapien, um einen möglichst langfristigen Zahnerhalt zu erzielen.

Schlüsselwörter

minimalinvasiv - direkte Kompositrestauration - Infiltration - Tunnelierung - Bisshebung - Reparaturfüllung

• Literatur

• 1 Federlin M, Blunck U, Frankenberger R. et al. S1-Handlungsempfehlung Kompositrestaurationen im Seitenzahnbereich. 2016. Im Internet: https://www.dgzmk.de/uploads/tx_szdgzmkdocuments/kompositszblang.pdf Stand: 29.08.2018
• 2 Verde AV, Ramos MMD, Stoneham AM. Benefits in cost and reduced discomfort of new techniques of minimally invasive cavity treatment. J Dent Res 2009; 88: 297-299
• 3 Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H. Infiltrants inhibit progression of natural caries lesions in vitro. J Dent Res 2010; 89: 1276-1280
• 4 Meyer-Lueckel H, Bitter K, Paris S. Randomized controlled clinical trial on proximal caries infiltration: three-year follow-up. Caries Res 2012; 46: 544-548
• 5 Meyer-Lückel H, Paris S. Kariesinfiltration. Zahnmedizin up2date 2011; 5: 323-340
• 6 McCullock AJ, Smith BG. In vitro studies of cuspal movement produced by adhesive restorative materials. Br Dent J 1986; 161: 405-409
• 7 Hellwig E, Klimek J, Attin T. Einführung in die Zahnerhaltung. 6. Aufl.. Köln: Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag; 2013
• 8 Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry: rationale of cavity design. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 92-99
• 9 Fasbinder DJ, Davis RD, Burgess JO. Marginal ridge strength in Class II tunnel restorations. Am J Dent 1991; 4: 77-82
• 10 Strand GV, Tveit AB, Gjerdet NR. et al. Marginal ridge strength of teeth with tunnel preparations. Int Dent J 1995; 45: 117-123
• 11 Ji W, Chen Z, Frencken JE. Strength of tunnel-restored teeth with different materials and marginal ridge height. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1363-1370
• 12 Pyk N, Mejàre I. Tunnel restorations in general practice. Influence of some clinical variables on the success rate. Acta Odontol Scand 1999; 57: 195-200
• 13 Papa J, Cain C, Messer HH. et al. Tunnel restorations versus Class II restorations for small proximal lesions: a comparison of tooth strengths. Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 93-98
• 14 Schiffner U. Karies. Wissenschaft und klinische Praxis. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2012
• 15 Camargo MA, Roda MI, Marques MM. et al. Micro-tensile bond strength to bovine sclerotic dentine: influence of surface treatment. J Dent 2008; 36: 922-927
• 16 Ommerborn MA. Bruxismus: Prävalenz und Risikofaktoren. Zahnmedizin up2date 2013; 7: 581-605
• 17 Wegehaupt F, Jorge F, Attin T. et al. Influence of shortened light-curing duration on the potential of resin-based surface sealants to prevent erosion. Oral Health Prev Dent 2017; 15: 79-87
• 18 Wegehaupt FJ, Tauböck TT, Attin T. Durability of the anti-erosive effect of surfaces sealants under erosive abrasive conditions. Acta Odontol Scand 2013; 71: 1188-1194
• 19 Deari S, Wegehaupt FJ, Tauböck TT. et al. Influence of different pretreatments on the microtensile bond strength to eroded dentin. J Adhes Dent 2017; 19: 147-155
• 20 Attin T, Tauböck TT. Direkte adhäsive Kompositrestaurationen zur Rekonstruktion erosiver Zahnhartsubstanzdefekte. Swiss Dent J 2016; 127: 131-143
• 21 Tepper SA, Schmidlin PR. Technik der direkten Bisshöhenrekonstruktion mit Komposit und einer Schiene als Formhilfe. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2005; 115: 35-42
• 22 Attin T, Filli T, Imfeld C. et al. Composite vertical bite reconstructions in eroded dentitions after 5.5 years: a case series. J Oral Rehabil 2012; 39: 73-79
• 23 Abduo J, Lyons K. Clinical considerations for increasing occlusal vertical dimension: a review. Aust Dent J 2012; 57: 2-10
• 24 Mjör IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE. Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Int Dent J 2000; 50: 361-366
• 25 Brantley CF, Bader JD, Shugars DA. et al. Does the cycle of rerestoration lead to larger restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126: 1407-1413
• 26 Fernández E, Martín J, Vildósola P. et al. Can repair increase the longevity of composite resins? Results of a 10-year clinical trial. J Dent 2015; 43: 279-286
• 27 Estay J, Martín J, Viera V. et al. 12 years of repair of amalgam and composite resins: A clinical study. Oper Dent 2018; 43: 12-21
• 28 Lucena-Martín C, González-López S, Navajas-Rodríguez de Mondelo JM. The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heat-treated composites. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 481-488
• 29 Rodrigues SA, Ferracane JL, Della Bona A. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 442-451
• 30 Valente LL, Silva MF, Fonseca AS. et al. Effect of diamond bur grit size on composite repair. J Adhes Dent 2015; 17: 257-263
• 31 Frankenberger R, Roth S, Krämer N. et al. Effect of preparation mode on Class II resin composite repair. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30: 559-564
• 32 Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Ebert J. et al. Fatigue behavior of the resin-resin bond of partially replaced resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent 2003; 16: 17-22
• 33 Özcan M. The use of chairside silica coating for different dental applications: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 469-472
• 34 Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS, Amer MA. Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite. J Dent 2008; 36: 969-976
• 35 Hisamatsu N, Atsuta M, Matsumura H. Effect of silane primers and unfilled resin bonding agents on repair bond strength of a prosthodontic microfilled composite. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 644-648
• 36 Wiegand A, Stawarczyk B, Buchalla W. et al. Repair of silorane composite — Using the same substrate or a methacrylate-based composite. Dent Mater 2012; 28: e19-e25
• 37 Wendler M, Belli R, Panzer R. et al. Repair bond strength of aged resin composite after different surface and bonding treatments. Materials (Basel) 2016; 9: 547 doi:10.3390/ma9070547
• 38 Pilo R, Brosh T, Geron V. et al. Effect of silane reaction time on the repair of a nanofilled composite using tribochemical treatment. J Adhes Dent 2016; 18: 125-134
• 39 Hannig C, Hahn P, Thiele PP. et al. Influence of different repair procedures on bond strength of adhesive filling materials to etched enamel in vitro. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 800-807
• 40 Roeder LB, Berry EA, You C. et al. Bond strength of composite to air-abraded enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 1995; 20: 186-190