Abstract
Trail running places specific physiological demands on the human body due to its uphill
and downhill running sections. We developed and investigated a more sport-specific
trail exercise test protocol (inclination and speed incremental protocol), and compared
it to two standard exercise test protocols (horizontal step and ramp protocol) in
thirteen highly trained trail runners (age 31±6 years, height 179±6.4 cm, weight 69.2±7.9 kg,
BMI 21.6±2.1 kg/m2). The maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) measured during the trail test (62.5±5.9 ml·kg−1·min−1, [95% CI: 59.0-66.1]) was significantly higher compared to both the step test (60.1±5.3 ml·kg−1·min−1, [95% CI: 56.8-63.3], p=0.024) and the ramp test (59.7±5.5 ml·kg−1·min−1, [95% CI: 56.4-63.0], p=0.028). Time to task failure was significantly shorter in
the trail test (557±73 s, [95% CI: 512-601]) compared to both the step test (1378±152 s,
[95% CI: 1286-1470], p<0.001) and the ramp test (605±95, [95% CI: 547-662], p<0.001).
Other physiological measurements obtained were similar. The trail test was the preferred
choice in our group of trail runners. This study supports the implementation of the
trail test in practice, and recommends that its validity be evaluated further.
Key word
trail running - exercise test - performance - VO2max
