Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00034926.xml
Homeopathy 2002; 91(04): 195-196
DOI: 10.1054/homp.2002.0048
DOI: 10.1054/homp.2002.0048
Editorial
Send in your cases, or the lost art of the concise case report
Subject Editor:
Further Information
Publication History
Publication Date:
28 December 2017 (online)
-
References
- 1 Thompson T, Owen D, Swayne J. The case for cases: publishing high-quality case reports in homeopathy. Homeopathy 2002; 91: l-2.
- 2 Baas C. This is my truth, tell me yours. Homeopathy 2002; 91: 129-130.
- 3 Dantas F, Fisher P. A systematic review of homoeopathic pathogenetic trials (‘provings’) published in the United Kingdom from 1945 to 1995. In: Ernst E. (ed). Homoeopathy: A Critical Appraisal. 1998. London: Butterworth Heinemann; 69-97.
- 4 Davidson J, Fisher P, van Haselen Woodbury M, Connor K. Do constitutional types really exist? A further study using Grade of Membership analysis. Br Hom J 2001; 90: 138-147.
- 5 Aghadiuno M. A study of the inter-observer reliability of paper case analysis. Homeopathy 2002; 91: 10-17.
- 6 Milgrom L. Patient–practitioner–remedy entanglement. Homeopathy 2002; 91: 239-248.
- 7 Stolper CF, Rutten A LB, Lugten R FG, Barthels R JWM. Improving homeopathic prescribing by applying epidemiological techniques: the role of likelihood ratio. Homeopathy 2002; 91: 230-238.