Download PDF
Homeopathy 2016; 105(01): 102-108
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2015.08.005
Original Paper
Copyright © The Faculty of Homeopathy 2015

Use of homeopathy in organic dairy farming in Spain

Inmaculada Orjales
1   Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Departamento de Ciencias Clínicas Veterinarias, Facultad de Veterinaria, 27002 Lugo, Spain
,
Marta López-Alonso
2   Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Departamento de Patología Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, 27002 Lugo, Spain
,
Ruth Rodríguez-Bermúdez
2   Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Departamento de Patología Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, 27002 Lugo, Spain
,
Francisco Rey-Crespo
2   Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Departamento de Patología Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, 27002 Lugo, Spain
3   Centro Tecnológico Agroalimentario de Lugo (CETAL), 27003 Lugo, Spain
,
Ana Villar
4   Centro de Investigación y Formación Agrarias (CIFA), Héroes 2 de mayo 27, 39600 Muriedas, Cantabria, Spain
,
Marta Miranda
1   Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Departamento de Ciencias Clínicas Veterinarias, Facultad de Veterinaria, 27002 Lugo, Spain
› Author Affiliations
Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

Received10 October 2014
revised17 July 2015

accepted13 August 2015

Publication Date:
23 December 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Organic farming principles promote the use of unconventional therapies as an alternative to chemical substances (which are limited by organic regulations), with homeopathy being the most extensive. Traditionally, Spain has had little faith in homeopathy but its use in organic farming is growing. Fifty-six Spanish organic dairy farmers were interviewed to obtain what we believe to be the first data on the use of homeopathy in organic dairy cattle in Spain. Only 32% of farms use some sort of alternative therapy (16.1% homeopathy, 10.7% phytotherapy and 5.3% using both therapies) and interestingly, a clear geographical pattern showing a higher use towards the East (similar to that in the human population) was observed. The main motivation to use homeopathy was the need to reduce chemical substances promoted by organic regulations, and the treatment of clinical mastitis being the principle reason. The number of total treatments was lower in farms using homeopathy compared with those applying allopathic therapies (0.13 and 0.54 treatments/cow/year respectively) and although the bulk SCC was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in these farms (161,826 and 111,218 cel/ml, respectively) it did not have any negative economical penalty for the farmer and milk quality was not affected complying with the required standards; on the contrary homeopathic therapies seems to be an alternative for reducing antibiotic treatments, allowing farmers to meet the organic farming principles.

Keywords

Dairy cattle - Homeopathy - Organic farming - Somatic cell count
 

  • References

  • 1 IFOAM (International Federation on Organic Agriculture Movement). The IFOAM basic standards for organic production and processing. 2005. http://www.ifoam.org/sites/default/files/page/files/norms_eng_v4_20090113.pdf.
    Google Scholar
  • 2 USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). National Organic Programme. Department of Agriculture: 2001. http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELPRDC5087165.
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Council Regulation (EC). Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on organic production and labeling of organic products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91. Off J Eur Comm 2007; L189: 1-23.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hovi M., Roderick S. Mastitis and mastitis control strategies in organic milking. Cattle Pract 2000; 8: 259-264.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Fall N., Emanuelson U., Martinsson K., Jonsson S. Udder health at a Swedish research farm with both organic and conventional dairy cow management. Prev Vet Med 2008; 83: 186-195.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 WHO (Wolrd Health Organization). Antimicrobial resistance. Global Report on Surveillance 2014 2001 http://www.who.int/drugresistance/documents/AMR_report_Web_slide_set.pdf?ua=1.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hektoen L. Review of the current involvement of homeopathy in veterinary practice and research. Vet Rec 2005; 157: 224-229.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ernst E., Resch K.-L., Mills S. et al. Complementary medicine: a definition. Br J Gen Pract 1995; 45: 506.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hektoen L., Larsen S., Odegaard S.A., Loken T. Comparison of homeopathy, placebo and antibiotic treatment of clinical mastitis in dairy cows – methodological issues and results from a randomized-clinical trial. J Vet Med A 2004; 51: 439-446.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Varshney J.P., Naresh R. Evaluation of a homeopathic complex in the clinical management of udder diseases of riverine buffaloes. Homeopathy 2004; 93: 17-20.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). The use of homeopathic nosodes in the prevention of mastitis within organic dairy herds. 2005. http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Menu=Menu&Module=More&Location=None&Completed=0&ProjectID=9153.
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Holmes M.A., Cockcroft P.D., Booth C.E., Heath M.F. Controlled clinical trial of the effect of a homoeopathic nosode on the somatic cell counts in the milk of clinically normal dairy cows. Vet Rec 2005; 156: 565-567.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Chandel B.S., Dadawala A.I., Chauchan H.C., Parsani H.R.Pankajkumar. Efficacy of a homeopathic complex and antibiotics in treatment of clinical mastitic cattle in North Gujarat. Vet World 2009; 2: 383-384.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ruegg P.L. Management of mastitis on organic and conventional dairy farms. J Anim Sci 2009; 87: 43-55.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kockle P., Ivemeyer S., Butler G., Maeschli A., Heil F. A randomized controlled trial to compare the use of homeopathy and internal teat sealers for the prevention of mastitis in organically farmed dairy cows during the dry period and 100 days post-calving. Homeopathy 2010; 99: 90-98.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Werner C., Sobiraj A., Sundrum A. Efficacy of homeopathic and antibiotic treatment strategies in cases of mild and moderate bovine clinical mastitis. J Dairy Res 2010; 77: 460-467.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Silva J.R.M., Bitencourt L.L., Oliveira B.M.L. et al. Supplementation of dairy cows with homeopathy: milk somatic cells, cortisol and immunity. Arq Bras Med Vet Zoo 2011; 63: 805-813.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Mrode R.A., Swanson G.J.T. Genetical and statistical properties of somatic cell count and its suitability as an indirect means of reducing the incidence of mastitis in dairy cattle. Anim Breed Abstr 1996; 64: 847-857.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kossaibati M.A., Esselmont R. The cost of production diseases in dairy herds in England. Vet J 1997; 154: 41-51.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Reneau JK. Effective use of dairy herd improvement somatic cell count in mastitis control. J Dairy Sci 1986; 69: 1708-1720.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Haskell M.J., Landgford F.M., Jack C.M., Sherwood A.B., Rutherford K.M.D. The effect of organic status and management practices on somatic cell count on UK dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92: 3775-3780.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kiarazm M., Tajik P., Nava H.G. Assessment of the effect of homoeopathic nosodes in subclinical bovine mastitis. Ann Biol Res 2011; 2: 552-562.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Díaz Sáez G., Moreno Sánchez G., Balmy S. Estudio sobre conocimiento y uso de homeopatía en España. Rev Médica Homeopat 2012; 5: 113-119.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 MAGRAMA (Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente). Agricultura ecológica: Estadísticas 2012. 2013. http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/alimentacion/temas/la-agriculturaecologica/Estadisticas_AE_2012_ok_tcm7-297880.pdf.
    Google Scholar
  • 25 ICAR (International Committee for Animal Recording). Cow milk enquiry 2008–2009. 2009. http://www.icar.org/Documents/Yearly%20inquiry/2008-2009/Table%201.pdf.
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Rosati A., Aumaitre A. Organic dairy farming in Europe. Livest Prod Sci 2004; 90: 41-51.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 OSC (Organic Studies Centre). Studies of the composition of milk produced on organic and conventional dairy farms. 2006. http://www.organicstudiescornwall.co.uk/pdf_docs/bulletins/Bulletin%208.pdf.
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Hamilton C., Emanuelson U., Forslund K., Hansson I., Ekman T. Mastitis and related management factors in certified organic dairy herds in Sweden. Acta Vet Scand 2006; 48: 1-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Rozzi P., Miglior F., Hand K. A total merit selection index for Ontario organic dairy farmers. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 1584-1593.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Pol M., Ruegg P.L. Treatment practices and quantification of antimicrobial drug usage in conventional and organic dairy farms in Wisconsin. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 249-261.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Thomas K., Coleman P. Use of complementary or alternative medicine in a general population in Great Britain. Results from the National omnibus survey. J Public Health 2004; 26: 152-157.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Hansen B., Grimsgaard S., Launso L., Fonnebo V., Falkenberg T., Rasmussen N.K. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in the Scandinavian countries. Scand J Prim Health 2005; 23: 57-62.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Hektoen L. Investigations of the motivation underlying Norwegian dairy farmers use of homeopathy. Vet Rec 2004; 155: 701-707.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Weller R., Bowling P. Health status of dairy herds in organic farming. Vet Rec 2000; 146: 80-81.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Krömer V., Pfannenschmidt F. Mastitis incidence and therapy in organic dairy farms. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau. Germany; Kassel: 2005: 409-410.
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Egan J.A. questionnaire survey on the uptake of homoeopathic mastitis remedies in Irish dairy herds. Ir Vet J 1998; 51: 141-143.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 USDA (United States Departament of Agriculture). Antibiotic use in US dairy operations. 2007. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/nahms/dairy/downloads/dairy07/Dairy07_is_AntibioticUse.pdf.
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Dalton T.J., Parsons R., Kersbergen R. et al. A comparative analysis of organic dairy farms in Maine and Vermont: farm financial information from 2004 to 2006. Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station Tech. Bull.; Orono, ME: 2008.
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Cook A.L., Heackoc P.S., Criner G.K., Bragg L.A. Organic milk production in Maine: attributes, costs and returns. Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station Tech. Bull.; Orono, ME: 2008.
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Rajala-Schultz P.J., Smith K.L., Hogan J.S., Love B.C. Antimicrobial susceptibility of mastitis pathogens from first lactation and older cows. Vet Microbiol 2004; 102: 33-42.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 McEwen S.A., Fedorka-Cray P.J. Antimicrobial use and resistance in animals. Clinl Infect Dis 2002; 34: S93-S106.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Varshney J.P., Naresh R. Comparative efficacy of homeopathic and allopathic systems of medicine in the management of clinical mastitis of Indian dairy cows. Homeopathy 2005; 94: 81-85.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Lorenzini G., Martini A., Sabatini L. et al. Efficiency and costs of the health management in an organic dairy farm where we use unconventional medicines. Ital J Anim Sci 2009; 8: 622-624.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Schaeren W. Fakten zur Verfutterung von antibiotikahaltiger Milch an Kalber. ALP Forum 2006: 1-2.
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Statistisches Bundesamt. Fachserie 3 Reihe 4.2.2., Milcherzeugung und – verwendung. Statistisches Bundesamt; Wiesbaden, Germany: 2008.
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Selim S.A., Cullor J.S. Number of viable bacteria and presumptive antibiotic residues in milk fed to calves on commercial dairies. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997; 211: 1029-1035.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar