Reporting Experiments in Homeopathic Basic Research (REHBaR)

Introduction: The aim of this study was to develop a criteria catalogue serving as a guideline for authors to improve quality of Reporting Experiments in Homeopathic Basic Research (REHBaR). Main focus was in the field of biochemical and biological experiments. So far, there was no guideline for scientists and authors available, unlike criteria catalogues common in clinical research.

Methods: A Delphi Process was conducted among experts who published experimental work within the last five years in this field. The process included a total of five rounds, three rounds of adjusting and phrasing plus two consensus conferences.

Results: A checklist of 23 items was achieved, augmented with detailed examples how to handle each item while compiling a publication. Background, objectives and possible hypotheses are necessary to be given in the part ‘introduction’. The section ‘materials and methods’ is the most important part, where a detailed description of chosen controls, object of investigation, experimental setup, replication, parameters, intervention, allocation, blinding, and statistical methods is mandatory. In the ‘results’ section sufficient details on analysed data, descriptive as well as inferential are needed. Moreover, authors should discuss their results and interpret them in the context of current evidence. REHBaR was compiled for authors when preparing their manuscripts, and to be used by scientific journals in the reviewing process.

Conclusions: Reporting experiments in basic research in homeopathy is an important issue to state the quality and validity of gained results. A guideline for REHBaR seemed to be the first step to come to a commitment what information is necessary to be given in a paper. More than that, the catalogue can serve as a statement what the standards in good basic research should be.

Key words

Reporting - Checklist - Quality - Experiments - Ultra high dilution - Homeopathy

• References

• 1 Witt C., Bluth M., Albrecht H.T., Weißhuhn T., Baumgartner S., Willich S. The in vitro evidence for an effect of high homeopathic potencies – a systematic review of the literature. Complementary Ther Med 2007; 15 (02) 128-138.
• 2 Schulte J. About quality and standards in ultra high dilution research and research on homeopathy. In: Endler P.C.S.J. (ed). Ultra High Dilution—Physiology and Physics. 1994. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; pp 171-176.
• 3 Linde W., Melchart D., Jonas W., Hornung J. Ways to enhance the quality and acceptance of clinical and laboratory studies in homoeopathy. Br Homoeopath J 1994; 83 (01) 3-7.
• 4 Baumgartner S., Heusser P., Thurneysen A. Methodological standards and problems in preclinical homoeopathic potency research. Forsch Komplementarmedizin Klass Naturheilkd 1998; 5 (01) 27-32.
• 5 Linde K., Jonas W., Melchart D., Worku F., Wagner H., Eitel F. Critical review and meta-analysis of serial agitated dilutions in experimental toxicology. Hum Exp Toxicol 1994; 13 (07) 481-492.
• 6 Becker-Witt C., Weißhuhn T., Lüdtke R., Willich S. Quality assessment of physical research in homeopathy. J Altern Complementary Med 2003; 9 (01) 113-132.
• 7 Linstone H., Turoff M. The Delphi method: techniques and applications. 2002. http://www.is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/.
• 8 Stock-Schröer B., Albrecht H., Betti L. et al. Reporting experiments in homeopathic basic research (REHBaR) – description of the checklist development. eCAM 2009; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nep170.  
• 9 Stock-Schröer B., Albrecht H., Betti L. et al. Reporting Experiments in Homeopathic Basic Research (REHBaR) – a guideline for authors. Homeopathy 2009; 98: 287-298.