CC BY-NC 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2013; 40(03): 268-269
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2013.40.3.268
Letter

Aesthetic Refinement of the Dog Ear Correction: The 90° Incision Technique and Review of the Literature

Luca Grassetti
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marche Polytechnic University Medical School, Regional Hospital, Ancona, Italy
,
Davide Lazzeri
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
,
Matteo Torresetti
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marche Polytechnic University Medical School, Regional Hospital, Ancona, Italy
,
Manuela Bottoni
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marche Polytechnic University Medical School, Regional Hospital, Ancona, Italy
,
Alessandro Scalise
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marche Polytechnic University Medical School, Regional Hospital, Ancona, Italy
,
Giovanni Di Benedetto
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marche Polytechnic University Medical School, Regional Hospital, Ancona, Italy
› Author Affiliations

The closure of any circular or asymmetric wound results in puckering or excess of tissue known as dog ears. Tissue dynamics, wound geometry, surface contour, and surgical technique affect dog ear formation [[1] [2]]. Despite good preoperative planning for skin management techniques including Burow's triangle, V-Y advancement flap, M-plasty [[3]], and S-plasty [[4]], and despite following intraoperative procedures including proper undermining of a shallow wound, proper 90° angle of the scalpel blade, precise suture placement, and removal of excess underlying fat, sometimes a dog ear occurs anyhow. Methods for correcting dog ears include excision of the excess tissue in the shape of a triangle, crescent or ellipse; excision of conical folds of tissue at the end of the wound in the same direction as the long axis of the original wound; and excision of the dog ear at a 120° angle to the long axis of the existing excision line in a shape resembling a hockey stick [[5]]. They are extensively described in the literature, but they all lead to wound extension. Only M-plasty allows for reduction in the scar's length but produces a double-tailed scar, so if the total length with the two tails is considered, the new scar is still longer than the original one. We have developed a new and easy technique for dog ear correction without extending the length of the original wound.

To remove a dog ear, the wound should be sutured until the elevation becomes pronounced. A hook placed in the end of the wound defines the extent of the dog ear. The elevation is then excised by creating a 90° incision at the end of the wound where the dog ear appears. In this way, a small triangular advancement flap can be raised upward or downward according to the skin region desired to be removed. This flap is brought across the wound so that the skin excess can be cut straightforwardly. A portion of the flap is then removed to the extent required and the 90° incision created will disappear as well ([Fig. 1], [2]).

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 The schema of our new technique for correcting a dog ear at the end of a wound. (A) Incision at a 90° angle to the long axis of the existing excision line to create a triangular advancement skin flap downward. As much of the triangular raised flap is removed as the correction requires. (B) The 90° incision created disappears as soon as the skin has been sutured. The steep protrusion of the dog ear disappears without either lengthening the wound or creating new scars. The red arrow shows the direction of the flap advancement used for dog ear removal.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Sequenced images of the 90° incision technique. (A) With an ink pen, a line is drawn at 90° along the base on one side of the standing full cone dog ear. (B) The apex of the dog ear is elevated with a skin hook. The line will be then incised, thus creating a triangular flap ready for removal. (C) After the triangular skin flap has been removed, the dog ear disappears without lengthening the wound.

The 90° incision technique enables correction of a dog ear without either lengthening the wound or creating new scars, thus improving the aesthetic outcome of the procedure.



Publication History

Received: 29 January 2013

Accepted: 20 March 2013

Article published online:
01 May 2022

© 2013. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Weisberg NK, Nehal KS, Zide BM. Dog-ears: a review. Dermatol Surg 2000; 26: 363-370
  • 2 Dzubow LM. The dynamics of dog-ear formation and correction. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1985; 11: 722-728
  • 3 Webster RC, Davidson TM, Smith RC. et al. M-plasty techniques. J Dermatol Surg 1976; 2: 393-396
  • 4 Zitelli JA. Tips for wound closure. Pearls for minimizing dog-ears and applications of periosteal sutures. Dermatol Clin 1989; 7: 123-128
  • 5 Toomey JM. "Practical suggestions on facial plastic surgery: how i do it"; subcutaneous pedicle flap reconstruction of lower nasal defects. Laryngoscope 1977; 87: 443-445