Indian Journal of Neurosurgery 2013; 02(02): 170-174
DOI: 10.4103/2277-9167.118119
Original Article
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

Surgery in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Outcome analysis in a series of 65 patients

Sumit Sinha
,
K.B. Shankar
1   Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Shashank Sharad Kale
,
Bhawani Shankar Sharma
› Author Affiliations

Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 January 2017 (online)

Abstract

Background

Multi-segmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MS-CSM) can be dealt with by either anterior or posterior approaches. The aim of study was to analyze the surgical outcomes of MS-CSM treated by either anterior cervical discectomy with fusion and cervical plating (ACDF) or cervical laminoplasty (LP).

Materials and Methods

Sixty-five patients with MS-CSM (two or more levels) underwent either ACDF (n=13) or LP (n=52). ACDF was performed in patients having these criteria: (i) three or less levels involved, (ii) myeloradiculopathy, (iii) pre-dominant anterior compression radiologically, (iv) <50 years age. LP was chosen in: (i) more than three levels involved (ii) posterior compression radiologically, (iii) >50 years age. Patients were evaluated pre- and post-operatively on the basis of modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) scoring and Hirabayashi formula. Thirty-five patients were followed up (8 in ACDF group and 27 in LP group). The mean follow-up period was 37.5 months (12.5-54 months).

Results

The mean pre-operative mJOA score in the ACDF group and the LP group was 11±2.62 and 10.6±2.04, respectively. The mean final post-operative mJOA score in the ACDF group (n=8) in follow-up was 14.12±2.36 (P<0.05) and in the LP group (n=27) was 14.63±1.64 (P<0.05). 86% had good-to-excellent outcome while 8.5% had poor outcome. Overall, the mean recovery was 64.73±18.9%. On analyzing two groups separately, the mean recovery in the ACDF group was 59.62±24.2, while in the LP group was 66.25±17.3 (P<0.05).

Conclusions

The choice of ACDF and LP in MS-CSM depends on pre-operative clinical and radiological parameters. If the surgical approach is chosen correctly, the surgery in MS-CSM can result in significant improvement in the clinical outcome of these patients.

 
  • References

  • 1 Emery SE. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2001; 9: 376-388
  • 2 Young WF. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in older persons. Am Fam Physician 2000; 62: 1064-1073
  • 3 Sampath P, Bendebba M, Davis JD, Ducker TB. Outcome of patients treated for cervical myelopathy. A prospective, multicenter study with independent clinical review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 670-676
  • 4 Emery SE, Bohlman HH, Bolesta MJ, Jones PK. Anterior cervical decompression and arthrodesis for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Two to seventeen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 941-951
  • 5 Hirabayashi K, Toyama Y, Chiba K. Expansive laminoplasty for myelopathy in ossification of the longitudinal ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; 359: 35-48
  • 6 Zhang ZH, Yin H, Yang K, Zhang T, Dong F, Dang G. et al Anterior inter-vertebral disc excision and bone grafting in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983; 8: 16-19
  • 7 Cheng WC, Chang CN, Lui TN, Lee ST, Wong CW, Lin TK. Surgical treatment for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. Surg Neurol 1994; 41: 90-97
  • 8 Lunsford LD, Bissonette DJ, Zorub DS. Anterior surgery for cervical disc disease. Part 2: Treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in 32 cases. J Neurosurg 1980; 53: 12-19
  • 9 Yamaura I, Kurosa Y, Matuoka T, Shindo S. Anterior floating method for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; 359: 27-34
  • 10 Matsuoka T, Yamaura I, Kurosa Y, Nakai O, Shindo S, Shinomiya K. Long-term results of the anterior floating method for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26: 241-248
  • 11 Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK. Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75: 1298-1307
  • 12 Dohler JR, Kahn MR, Hughes SP. Instability of the cervical spine after anterior interbody fusion. A study on its incidence and clinical significance in 21 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1985; 104: 247-250
  • 13 Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Yonenobu K. et al Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Part 1: Clinical results and limitations of laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32: 647-653
  • 14 Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Yonenobu K. et al Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Part 2: Advantages of anterior decompression and fusion over laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32: 654-660
  • 15 Masaki Y, Yamazaki M, Okawa A, Aramomi M, Hashimoto M, Koda M. et al An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007; 20: 7-13
  • 16 Tani T, Ushida T, Ishida K, Iai H, Noguchi T, Yamamoto H. Relative safety of anterior microsurgical decompression versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with a massive ossified posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27: 2491-2498
  • 17 Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Ishii T, Iwasaki M, Yoshikawa H. Long-term outcome of laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to disc herniation: A comparative study of laminoplasty and anterior spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 756-759
  • 18 Goubier JN, Benazet Dagger JP, Saillant G. Surgical decompression of cervical arthrotic myelopathies: Comparison of surgical anterior and posterior approaches [Article in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2002; 88: 591-600
  • 19 Wang MY, Shah S, Green BA. Clinical outcomes following cervical laminoplasty for 204 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol 2004; 62: 487-493
  • 20 George B, Gauthier N, Lot G. Multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy treated by multilevel oblique corpectomies without fusion. Neurosurgery 1999; 44: 81-90