Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2010; 49(02): 123-134
DOI: 10.3414/ME9308
Special Topic – Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Architectural Approach to eHealth for Enabling Paradigm Changes in Health

B. Blobel
1   eHealth Competence Center, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



05 January 2010

Publication Date:
17 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: For improving safety and quality of care as well as efficiency of health delivery under the well-known burdens, health services become specialized, distributed, and therefore collaborative, thereby changing the health service paradigm from organization-centered over process-controlled to personal health (pHealth).

Methods: Personalized eHealth services provided independent of time and location have to be based on advanced technical paradigms of mobile, pervasive and autonomous computing, enabling ubiquitous health services. Personalized eHealth systems require a multidiscipli-nary approach including medicine, informatics, biomedical engineering, bioinformatics and the omics disciplines but also legal and regulatory affairs, administration, security, privacy and ethics, etc. Interoperability between different components of the intended system must be provided through an architecture-centric, model-driven, formalized process.

Results: In order to analyze, design, specify, implement and maintain such an interactive environment impacted by so many different domains, a formal and unified methodology for system analysis and design has been developed and deployed, based on an overall architectural framework. The paper introduces the underlying paradigms, requirements, architectural reference models, modeling and formalization principles as well as development processes for comprehensive service-oriented personalized eHealth inter-operability chains, thereby exploiting all inter-operability levels up to service interoperability. A special focus is put on ontologies and knowledge representation in the context of eHealth and pHealth solutions. Furthermore, EHR solutions, security requirements, existing and emerging standards, and educational challenges for realizing personalized pHealth are briefly discussed.

Conclusion: For personal health, bridging between disciplines including ontology coordination is the crucial demand. All aspects of the design and development process have to be considered from an architectural viewpoint.

Keywords

Personal health - system architecture - semantic interoperability - ontology - knowledge representation - universal logic - ubiquitous care
 

  • References

  • 1 Demiris G, Afrin LB, Speedie S, Courtney KL, Sondhi M, Vimarlund V, Lovis C, Goossen W, Lynch CL. Patient-centered Applications: Use of Information Technology to Promote Disease Management and Wellness. A White Paper by the AMIA Knowledge in Motion Working Group, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15: 8-13.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Blobel B. Introduction into Advanced eHealth – The Personal Health Challenge. In: Blobel B, Pharow P, Nerlich M. (eds). eHealth: Combining Health Telematics, Telemedicine, Biomedical Engineering and Bioinformatics to the Edge – Global Experts Summit Textbook, Stud Health Technol Inform Vol. 134. Amsterdam, Berlin, New York, Tokyo: IOS Press; 2008. pp 3-14.
    Google Scholar
  • 3 European Union.. Road-mapping personal health systems scenarios and research themes for FP 7th and beyond (PHS 2020). http://www.ehealthnews. eu/content/view/1227/108/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Institute for Prospective Technological Studies – IS Unit.. Strategic forward-looking priority setting: Scope 2009 – Personal Health Systems. http://is.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pages/TFS/sps.html. Last access: December 1, 2009
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Eysenbach G. What is e-health?. J Med Internet Res 2001; 3 (02) e20. http://www.jmir.org/2001/2/e20 Last access: December 1, 2009;
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Blobel B. Analysis, design and implementation of secure and interoperable distributed health information system. Stud Health Technol Inform Vol. 89, Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Haux R. Individualization, globalization and health – about sustainable information technologies and the aim of medical informatics. Int J Med Inf 2006; 75: 795-808.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kulikowski CA. The Micro-Macro Spectrum of Medical Informatics Challenges – From Molecular Medicine to Transforming Health Care in a Globalizing Society. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41: 20-24.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Maojo V, Martin-Sanchez F, Billhardt H, Iakovidis I, Kulikowski C. Establishing an Agenda for Biomedical Informatics. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42: 121-125.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Object Management Group, Inc.. http://www.omg.org. Last access: December 1, 2009
    PubMed
  • 11 Fraunhofer Gesellschaft.. Body Area Network. http://www.ban.fraunhofer.de Last access: December 1, 2009
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lanfranchi G, Della Peruta P, Perrone A, Calvanese D. Toward a new landscape of systems management in an autonomic computing environment. IBM Systems Journal 2003; 42 (01) 119-128.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kirn S, Müller G. Ministudie zu den F&E-Perspektiven auf dem Gebiet der Gesundheitstelematik. Hohenheim: University of Hohenheim; 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Blobel B. Application of the Component Paradigm for Analysis and Design of Advanced Health System Architectures. Int J Med Inf 2000; 60 (03) 281-301.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Akerman A, Tyree J. Using ontology to support development of software architectures. IBM Systems Journal 2006; 45 (04) 813-825.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Smith B, Ceusters W, Temmerman R. Wüsteria. In: Engelbrecht R, Geissbuhler A, Lovis C, Mihals G. (eds). Connecting Medical Informatics and Bio Informatics. Proceedings of MIE2005. Stud Health Technol Inform Vol. 116. Amsterdam, Berlin, New York, Tokyo: IOS Press; 2005. pp 647-652.
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Guarino N. Formal Ontology, Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation. In: Guarino N, Poli R. (eds). Special issue on Formal Ontology, Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation. www.loa-cnr.it/Papers/FormOntKRpdf Last access: December 1, 2009.
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Smith B, Ashburner M, Rosse C, Bard J, Bug W, Ceusters W, Goldberg LJ, Eilbeck K, Ireland A, Mungall CJ, Consortium OBI, Leontis N, Roca-Serra P, Ruttenberg A, Sansone SA, Scheuermann RH, Shah N, Whetzel PL, Lewis S. The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nature Biotechnology 2007; 25 (11) 1251-1255. 2007.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 W3C, OWL Web Ontology Language – Use Cases and Requirements. W3C Recommendation February 10, 2004
    PubMed
  • 20 Kuhn KA, Knoll A, Mewes H-W, Schwaiger M, Bode A, Broy M, Daniel H, Feussner H, Gradinger R, Hauner H, Höfler H, Holzmann B, Horsch A, Kemper A, Krcmar H, Kochs EF, Lange R, Leidl R, Mansmann U, Mayr EW, Meitinger T, Molls M, Navab N, Nüsslin F, Peschel C, Reiser M, Ring J, Rummeny EJ, Schlichter J, Schmid R, Wichmann HE, Ziegler S. Informatics and Medicine: From Molecules to Populations. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47: 283-295.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 ISO 10746 “Information Technology – Open Distributed Processing”.. http://www.iso.org. Last access: December 1, 2009
    PubMed
  • 22 Vetere G, Lenzerini M. Models for semantic inter-operability in service-oriented architectures. IBM Systems Journal 2005; 44 (04) 887-903.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Brown AW, Delbaere M, Eeles P, Johnston S, Weaver R. Realizing service-oriented solutions with the IBM Rational Software Development Platform. IBM Systems Journal 2005; 44 (04) 727-752.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Brown AW, Iyengar S, Johnston S. A rational approach to model driven development. IBM Systems Journal 2006; 45 (03) 463-480.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 International Business Machines Corporation (IBM).. Rational Unified Process. www.ibm.com/software/awdtools/rup/ Last access: December 1, 2009
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 ISO/IEC 19793:2008 “Information technology – Open Distributed Processing – Use of UML for ODP system specifications”.. http://www.iso.org. Last access: December 1, 2009
    PubMed
  • 27 ISO/IEC 15414:2006 “Information technology – Open distributed processing – Reference model – Enterprise language”.. http://www.iso.org. Last access: December 1, 2009
    PubMed
  • 28 Lopez DM, Blobel B. A Development Framework for Semantically Interoperable Health Information Systems. Int J Med Inf 2008; 78 (02) 83-103.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Lopez DM, Blobel B. Enhanced Semantic Inter-operability by Profiling Health Informatics Standards. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48 (02) 170-177.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Russel S, Norvig P. Artificial Intelligence – A Modern Approach. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Kamareddine F, Laan T, Nederpelt R. A Modern Perspective on Type Theory. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Bloe R, Kamareddine F, Nederpelt R. The Barendregt Cube with Definitions and Generalized Reduction. Information and computation 1996; 126 (02) 123-143.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Blobel B. Concept Representation in Health Informatics for Enabling Intelligent Architectures. In: Hasman A, Haux R, van der Lei J, De Clercq E, Roger-France F. (eds). Ubiquity: Technology for Better Health in Aging Societies. Stud Health Technol Inform Vol. 124. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2006. pp 285-291.
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Blobel B, Zvarova J. Architecture-centric approaches to ontology-driven pHealth systems. Submitted to Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Shabo A, Rabinovici-Cohen S, Vortman P. Revolutionary impact of XML on biomedical information interoperability. IBM Systems Journal 2006; 45 (02) 361-372.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 World Wide Web Consortium.. http://w3c.org. Last access: December 1, 2009
    PubMed
  • 37 Blobel B, Pharow P. Formal Policies for Flexible EHR Security. In: Bos L, Roa L, Yogesan K, O’Con-nell B, Marsh A, Blobel B. editors. Medical and Care Compunetics 3. Stud Health Technol Inform Vol. 121. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2006. pp 307-316.
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS).. http://www.oasis-open.org. Last access: December 1, 2009
    PubMed
  • 39 Kulikowski CA. The Micro-Macro Spectrum of Medical Informatics Challenges – From Molecular Medicine to Transforming Health Care in a Globalizing Society. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41: 20-24.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Maojo V, Martin-Sanchez F, Billhardt H, Iakovidis I, Kulikowski C. Establishing an Agenda for Biomedical Informatics. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42: 121-125.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Simon J, Dos Santos M, Fielding J, Smith B. Formal ontology for natural language processing and the integration of biomedical databases. Int J Med Inf 2006; 75: 224-231.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Faust O, Sputh BHC, Acharya R, Allen AR. A pervasive design strategy for distributed health care systems. The Open Medical Informatics Journal 2008; 2: 58-69.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Schulz S, Suntisrivaraporn B, Baader F, Boeker M. SNOMED reaching its adolescence: Ontologists’ and logicians’ health check. Int J Med Inf. 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.004.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 de Alfonso C, Blanquer I, Hernández V. Large Medical Datasets on the Grid. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44: 172-176.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Blobel B. Ontology Driven Health Information Systems Architectures Enable pHealth for Empowered Patients. Submitted to Int J Med Inf.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Rebstock M, Fengel J, Paulheim H. Ontologies-Based Business Integration. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Renear AH, Palmer CL. Strategic Reading, Ontologies, and the Future of Scientific Publishing. Science 2009; 325: 828-832.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Inc.. http://www.ieee1073.org. Last access: December 1, 2009
    PubMed
  • 49 National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS).. http://www.nccls.org or http://www.clsi.org. Last access: December 1, 2009
    PubMed
  • 50 Continua Health Alliance.. http://www.continua alliance.org. Last access: December 1, 2009
    PubMed
  • 51 Blobel BGME, Pharow P, Norgall T. How to Enhance Integrated Care towards the Personal Health Paradigm?. In: Kuhn KA, Warren JR, Leong T-Z. (eds). MEDINFO 2007, Amsterdam, Berlin, Oxford, Tokyo, Washington, DC: IOS Press; 2007. pp 172-176.
    Google Scholar
  • 52 European Commission.. The right prescription for Europe’s eHealth. http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/health/policy/index_en.htm.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Blobel B. Comparing EHR Models. In: eHealth Conference 2007 – Experts’ Special Interest Sessions. Schriftenreihe der GVG, Bd. 58. Bonn: nanos Verlag; 2008. pp 63-80.
    Google Scholar
  • 54 Demetriades JE, Kolodner RM, Christopherson GA. (eds). Person-Centred Health Records – Towards HealthePeople. New York: Springer Health Informatics Series; 2005. pp 125-146.
    Google Scholar
  • 55 Blobel B, Pharow P. Analysis and Evaluation of EHR Approaches. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48: 162-169.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 ISO TS. 22600:2006 Health informatics – Privilege management and access control.
    PubMed
  • 57 Blobel B, Nordberg R, Davis JM, Pharow P. Modelling privilege management and access control. Int J Med Inf 2006; 75 (08) 597-623.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 RFID Atlas.. RFID Anwenderbeispiel Future Hospital. http://www.rfidatlas.de. Last access: December 1, 2009
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Merl O, Peschorn R, Nurnberg M, Steinbach K. Austrian pacemaker registry: improving reporting compliance in 60-center national registry. Computers in Cardiology 1999; 26: 317-318.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Ceusters W, Elkin P, Smith B. Negative findings in electronic health records and biomedical ontologies: A realist approach. Int J Med Inf 2007; 76S: S326-S333.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Health Level Seven Inc.. http://www.hl7.org. Last access: December 1, 2009
    PubMed
  • 62 openEHR Foundation. http://www.openehr.org. Last access: December 1, 2009
    PubMed
  • 63 Becks T, Dehm J. IMEX – A New Knowledge Platform for Microsystems in Medicine. www.vde-mikromedizin.de.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 ISO TS 25720:2009.. Health informatics – Genomic sequence variation markup language. International Organization for Standardization/TC 251 Medizinische Informatik. http://www.iso.ch/tc215.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Engel K, Blobel B, Pharow P. Standards for Enabling Health Informatics Interoperability. In: Hasman A, Haux R, van der Lei J, De Clercq E, Roger-France F. (eds). Ubiquity: Technology for Better Health in Aging Societies. Stud Health Technol Inform Vol. 124. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2006. pp 145-150.
    Google Scholar
  • 66 National Library of Medicine.. PubMed. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed. Last access: December 1 2009
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 National Institute for Health.. GenBank. www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/Genbank. Last access: December 1, 2009
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Eclipse Foundation.. http://www.eclipse.org. Last access: December 1, 2009
    PubMed
  • 69 Open Ehealth Foundation.. ehealth.org/gf. Last access: December 1, 2009
    PubMed
  • 70 Free/Libre Open Source Software in Health Care (FLOSS-HC) Portal.. http://www.chirad.info. Last access: December 1, 2009
    PubMed
  • 71 Czarnecki K, Helsen S. Feature-based survey of model transformation approaches. IBM Systems Journal 2006; 45 (03) 621-645.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Blobel B. Educational Challenge of Health Information Systems’ Interoperability. Methods Inf Med 2007; 46: 52-56.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Nykänen P. Requirements for user-friendly personal ehealth information systems. In: Bos L, Blobel B, Marsh A, Carroll D. (eds). Medical care and Compunetics 5. Studies in Technology and Informatics 137. IOS Press; 2008. pp 367-372.
    Google Scholar
  • 74 Brender J. Handbook of Evaluation Methods for Health Informatics. London, Oxford, Boston, New York and San Diego: Academic Press; 2006
    Google Scholar