Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Methods Inf Med 2018; 57(S 01): e66-e81
DOI: 10.3414/ME18-02-0002
Focus Theme – Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

HiGHmed – An Open Platform Approach to Enhance Care and Research across Institutional Boundaries

Birger Haarbrandt   *
1   Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics, TU Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, Germany
,
Björn Schreiweis   *
2   Institute for Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
,
Sabine Rey
3   Department of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
,
Ulrich Sax
3   Department of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
,
Simone Scheithauer
4   Central Division of Infection Control and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
,
Otto Rienhoff
3   Department of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
,
Petra Knaup-Gregori
5   Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Udo Bavendiek
6   Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
,
Christoph Dieterich
7   Section of Bioinformatics and Systems Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Klaus Tschira Institute for Integrative Computational Cardiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Benedikt Brors
8   Division of Applied Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
,
Inga Kraus
3   Department of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
,
Caroline Marieken Thoms
3   Department of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
,
Dirk Jäger
9   Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Volker Ellenrieder
10   Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
,
Björn Bergh
11   Institute for Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
,
Ramin Yahyapour
12   Gesellschaft für wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung Göttingen (GWDG), University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
,
Roland Eils
13   Digital Health Center, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) and Charité, Berlin, Germany
14   Health Data Science Unit, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
HiGHmed Consortium
1   Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics, TU Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, Germany
,
Michael Marschollek
1   Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics, TU Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received: 19 February 2018

accepted: 26 May 2018

Publication Date:
17 July 2018 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Introduction: This article is part of the Focus Theme of Methods of Information in Medicine on the German Medical Informatics Initiative. HiGHmed brings together 24 partners from academia and industry, aiming at improvements in care provision, biomedical research and epidemiology. By establishing a shared information governance framework, data integration centers and an open platform architecture in cooperation with independent healthcare providers, the meaningful reuse of data will be facilitated. Complementary, HiGHmed integrates a total of seven Medical Informatics curricula to develop collaborative structures and processes to train medical informatics professionals, physicians and researchers in new forms of data analytics.

Governance and Policies: We describe governance structures and policies that have proven effective during the conceptual phase. These were further adapted to take into account the specific needs of the development and networking phase, such as roll-out, carerelated aspects and our focus on curricula development in Medical Inform atics.

Architectural Framework and Methodology: To address the challenges of organizational, technical and semantic interoperability, a concept for a scalable platform architecture, the HiGHmed Platform, was developed. We outline the basic principles and design goals of the open platform approach as well as the roles of standards and specifications such as IHE XDS, openEHR, SNOMED CT and HL7 FHIR. A shared governance framework provides the semantic artifacts which are needed to establish semantic interoperability.

Use Cases: Three use cases in the fields of oncology, cardiology and infection control will demonstrate the capabilities of the HiGHmed approach. Each of the use cases entails diverse challenges in terms of data protection, privacy and security, including clinical use of genome sequencing data (oncology), continuous longitudinal monitoring of physical activity (cardiology) and cross-site analysis of patient movement data (infection control).

Discussion: Besides the need for a shared governance framework and a technical infrastructure, backing from clinical leaders is a crucial factor. Moreover, firm and sustainable commitment by participating organizations to collaborate in further development of their information system architectures is needed. Other challenges including topics such as data quality, privacy regulations, and patient consent will be addressed throughout the project.

Keywords

Secondary use - information systems - medical informatics - decision support systems - data security - semantic interoperability - EHR

* These authors contributed equally to this work.


 

  • References

  • 1 PricewaterhouseCoopers. Transforming Healthcare through Secondary Use of Health Data. 2009
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rasmussen LV. The electronic health record for translational research. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 2014; 07 (06) 607-614.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Sutherland SM, Kaelber DC, Downing NL, Goel VV, Longhurst CA. Electronic Health Record-Enabled Research in Children Using the Electronic Health Record for Clinical Discovery. Pediatr Clin North Am 2016; 63 (02) 251-268.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Liao KP, Cai T, Gainer V, Goryachev S, Zengtreitler Q, Raychaudhuri S. et al. Electronic medical records for discovery research in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010; 62 (08) 1120-1127.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hersh WR. Adding value to the electronic health record through secondary use of data for quality assurance, research, and surveillance. Am J Manag Care 2007; 13 (6 Part 1): 277-278.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Dentler K, ten Teije A, de Keizer N, Cornet R. Barriers to the reuse of routinely recorded clinical data: a field report. Stud Health Technol Inform 2013; 192: 313-317.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Chute CG, Beck SA, Fisk TB, Mohr DN. The Enterprise Data Trust at Mayo Clinic: a semantically integrated warehouse of biomedical data. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010; 17 (02) 131-135.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lowe HJ, Ferris TA, Hernandez PM, Weber SC. STRIDE – an integrated standards-based translational research informatics platform. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2009; 2009: 391-395.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Danciu I, Cowan JD, Basford M, Wang X, Saip A, Osgood S. et al. Secondary use of clinical data: the Vanderbilt approach. J Biomed Inform 2014; 52: 28-35.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Tian Q, Price ND, Hood L. Systems cancer medicine: towards realization of predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory (P4) medicine. J Intern Med 2012; 271 (02) 111-121.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Tanaka H. Omics-based medicine and systems pathology. A new perspective for personalized and predictive medicine. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49 (02) 173-185.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Mirnezami R, Nicholson J, Darzi A. Preparing for precision medicine. N Engl J Med 2012; 366 (06) 489-491.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A. et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 2016; 03: 160018.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Schreiweis B, Bronsch T, Stein KE, Nost S, Aguduri LS, Brandner A. et al. An architecture for the integration of clinical data from a PEHR in a regional research platform. Stud Health Technol Inform 2016; 228: 272-276.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Brandner A, Schreiweis B, Aguduri LS, Bronsch T, Kunz A, Pensold P. et al. The patient portal of the personal cross-enterprise electronic health record (PEHR) in the Rhine-Neckar-Region. Stud Health Technol Inform 2016; 228: 157-161.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Koh HK, Brach C, Harris LM, Parchman ML. A proposed ‘health literate care model’ would constitute a systems approach to improving patients’ engagement in care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013; 32 (02) 357-367.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Beale T. Semantic scalability – the core challenge in e-health. 2014 [cited 2018 Jan 27]. Available from: https://wolandscat.net/2014/12/15/semantic-scalability-the-core-challenge-in-e-health/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Beale T. What is an ‘open platform’. 2014 [cited 2018 Jan 27]. Available from: https://wolandscat.net/2014/05/07/what-is-an-open-platform/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Stubbs A, Kotfila C, Uzuner Ö. Automated systems for the de-identification of longitudinal clinical narratives: Overview of 2014 i2b2/UTHealth shared task Track 1. J Biomed Inform 2015; 58 Suppl: S11-S19.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Baclawski K, Kilov H, Beale T. Archetypes: constraint-based domain models for future-proof information systems. In: Baclawski K, Kilov H. editors. Eleventh OOPSLA Workshop on Behavioral Semantics: Serving the Customer. Northeastern University; Evanston, IL, USA: 2002: 16-32.
    Google Scholar
  • 21 openEHR Foundation. Archetype Definition Language ADL2. 2018 [cited 2018 May 9]. Available from: http://www.openehr.org/releases/AM/latest/docs/ADL2/ADL2.html
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Garde S, Knaup P, Hovenga E, Heard S. Towards semantic interoperability for electronic health records. Methods Inf Med 2007; 46 (03) 332-343.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kalra D, Lloyd D. ISO 13606 electronic health record communication part 1: reference model. ISO. 13606-1 Geneva: ISO; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Archetype Modeling Language (AML). 2018 [cited 2018 May 9]. Available from: http://www.omg.org/spec/AML/
    PubMed
  • 25 Clinical Information Modeling Initiative (CIMI). [cited 2018 Jan 27]. Available from: http://www.opencimi.org
    PubMed
  • 26 Atalag K, Yang HY, Tempero E, Warren J. Model driven development of clinical information sytems using openEHR. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011; 169: 849-853.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ljosland SBakke. National governance of archetypes in Norway. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 216: 1091.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Wulff A, Haarbrandt B, Marschollek M. Clinical Knowledge Governance Framework for Nationwide Data Infrastructure Projects. Stud Health Technol Inform 2018; 248: 196-203.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Leslie H, Ljosland SBakke. Peer Review of Clinical Information Models: A Web 2.0 Crowdsourced Approach. Stud Health Technol Inform 2017; 245: 905-909.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Grieve G. FHIR and openEHR. (video file). [cited 2018 May 9]. Available from: https://vimeo.com/191939835
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Rector AL. The interface between information, terminology, and inference models. Stud Health Technol Inform 2001; 84 (Pt 1): 246-250.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Lee D, de Keizer N, Lau F, Cornet R. Literature review of SNOMED CT use. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21 e1 e11-e19.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 openEHR Foundation. Archetype Query Language (AQL). 2017 [cited 2018 May 9]. Available from: https://www.openehr.org/releases/QUERY/latest/docs/AQL/AQL.html
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 HL7 International. FHIR Terminology Service. [cited 2018 Jan 27]. Available from: https://www.hl7.org/fhir/terminology-service.html
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Seerainer C, Sabutsch SW. eHealth Terminology Management in Austria. Stud Health Technol Inform 2016; 228: 426-430.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise. IHE Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing. [cited 2018 Jan 27]. Available from: https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Cross-Enterprise_Document_Sharing
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise. IHE Crossenterprise Document Reliable Interchange. [cited 2018 Jan 27]. Available from: https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Cross-enterprise_Document_Reliable_Interchange
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 openEHR Foundation. Guideline Definition Language (GDL). 2015 [cited 2018 Jan 27]. Available from: http://www.openehr.org/releases/CDS/latest/docs/GDL/GDL.html
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Haarbrandt B, Tute E, Marschollek M. Automated population of an i2b2 clinical data warehouse from an openEHR-based data repository. J Biomed Inform 2016; 63: 277-294.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Haarbrandt B, Jack T, Marschollek M. Automated Transformation of openEHR Data Instances to OWL. Stud Health Technol Inform 2016; 223: 63-70.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 HIMSS Analytics. Children’s Hospital Ljubliana Achieves HIMSS Analytics EMRAM Stage 6. 2017 [cited 2018 May 9]. Available from: http://www.himssinsights.eu/childrens-hospital-ljubljanaachieves-himss-analytics-emram-stage-6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 HL7 International. Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) Specification. [cited 2018 Jan 27]. Available from: http://hl7.org/implement/standards/fhir/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Mandel JC, Kreda DA, Mandl KD, Kohane IS, Ramoni RB. SMART on FHIR: a standards-based, interoperable apps platform for electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (05) 899-908.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Marquardt JU, Galle PR, Teufel A. Molecular diagnosis and therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): an emerging field for advanced technologies. J Hepatol 2012; 56 (01) 267-275.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Acharya UR, Hagiwara Y, Sudarshan VK, Chan WY, Ng KH. Towards precision medicine: from quantitative imaging to radiomics. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2018; 19 (01) 6-24.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Owan TE, Hodge DO, Herges RM, Jacobsen SJ, Roger VL, Redfield MM. Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2006; 355 (03) 251-259.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Cassini A, Plachouras D, Eckmanns T, Abu MSin, Blank HP, Ducomble T. et al. Burden of Six Healthcare-Associated Infections on European Population Health: Estimating Incidence-Based Disability-Adjusted Life Years through a Population Prevalence-Based Modelling Study. PLoS Med 2016; 13 (10) e1002150.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. Digitale Innovationen – Neue Dimensionen von Bildung und Wissenschaft erschließen. 2017 [cited 2018 May 7]. Available from: https://www.bmbf.de/pub/Digitale_Innovationen.pdf German
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Hochschulforum Digitalisierung. The Digital Turn – Hochschulbildung im digitalen Zeitalter. 2016 [cited 2018 May 7]. Available from: https://hochschulforumdigitalisierung.de/sites/default/files/dateien/Abschlussbericht.pdf German
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Scheer A-W, Wachter C. Digitale Bildungslandschaften. Saarbrücken: imc information multimedia communication AG; 2016
    Google Scholar
  • 51 Weber GM, Murphy SN, McMurry AJ, Macfadden D, Nigrin DJ, Churchill S. et al. The Shared Health Research Information Network (SHRINE): a prototype federated query tool for clinical data repositories. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16 (05) 624-630.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 McMurry AJ, Murphy SN, MacFadden D, Weber G, Simons WW, Orechia J. et al. SHRINE: enabling nationally scalable multi-site disease studies. PLoS One 2013; 08 (03) e55811.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Natter MD, Quan J, Ortiz DM, Bousvaros A, Ilowite NT, Inman CJ. et al. An i2b2-based, generalizable, open source, self-scaling chronic disease registry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20 (01) 172-179.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Segagni D, Tibollo V, Dagliati A, Malovini A, Zambelli A, Napolitano C. et al. Clinical and research data integration: the i2b2-FSM experience. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2013 2013. 239-240 eCollection 2013.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Athey BD, Braxenthaler M, Haas M, Guo Y. tranSMART: An Open Source and Community-Driven Informatics and Data Sharing Platform for Clinical and Translational Research. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2013 2013. 6-8 eCollection 2013.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 De Moor G, Sundgren M, Kalra D, Schmidt A, Dugas M, Claerhout B. et al. Using electronic health records for clinical research: the case of the EHR4CR project. J Biomed Inform 2015; 53: 162-173.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Chute CG, Pathak J, Savova GK, Bailey KR, Schor MI, Hart LA. et al. The SHARPn project on secondary use of Electronic Medical Record data: progress, plans, and possibilities. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2011; 2011: 248-256.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 The European Parliament, The European Council. General Data Protection Regulation. Off J Eur Union 2016; 2014 (March 2014): 20-30.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar