Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.3414/ME16-14-0001
Methods Open – A New Journal Track Starting in 2017
Publication History
21 November 2016
Publication Date:
15 November 2017 (online)
Summary
From 2017 (volume 56) onwards the journal Methods of Information in Medicine will consist of two tracks. Authors can decide to submit their manuscript to either the subscription track that continues to publish its six print and electronic (non-open access) issues for journal subscribers, or the new Methods Open track that will consist of digitally published manuscripts (as gold open access). These two tracks will constitute from 2017 on the journal’s Tandem Model. Simultaneously, Methods will introduce a double-blinded review process and reviewer assessment by the submitting authors. Implications of these changes for both authors and reviewers are discussed. With these steps, Methods aims to improve the visibility of the journal and contribute to sharing research results as timely and as widely as possible and thereby to promote scientific progress.
-
References
- 1 McCray AT, Haux R. Supporting open access to scientific information. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41: 243-244.
- 2 Publisher’s note. Methods-Online: a free instant access to subscribers. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41 (01) V-VI.
- 3 Haux R, Aronsky D, Leong TY, McCray AT. Methods in year 50: preserving the past and preparing for the future. Methods Inf Med 2011; 50: 1-6.
- 4 Publisher’s note. Methods takes a big step forward to epub. Methods Inf Med 2007; 46 (04) II.
- 5 Haux R. Methods of information in medicine is changing–enhancing services to our authors and readers. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47: 469.
- 6 Haux R, Aronsky D, Leong TY, McCray AT. Methods extends free access to papers and offers optional open access model: new services and opportunities for authors and readers. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49: 1-2.
- 7 Haux R, Kuballa S, Schulze M, Böhm C, Gefeller O, Haaf J. et al. Exploring possibilities for transforming established subscription-based scientific journals into open access journals. Present situation, transformation criteria, and exemplary implementation within Trans-O-MIM. Methods Inf Med 2016; 55 (06) 481-487.
- 8 Haux R. Is Methods of Information in Medicine now a better journal than in the years before?. Methods Inf Med 2015; 54: 293-294.
- 9 Koch S, Lehmann CU, Haux R. On bridges and stacks. Appl Clin Inf 2016; 07: 707-710 and Methods Inf Med. 2016; 55: 299–300.
- 10 Björk BC, Welling P, Laakso M, Majlender P, Hedlund T, Gudnason G. Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009. PLoS One 2010; 05: e11273.
- 11 Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Kitas GD. Open access: changing global science publishing. Croat Med J 2013; 54: 403-406.
- 12 Suber P. Open access. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2012
- 13 Open Access Explained!. [cited 2016 Oct 5] Available from: http://phdcomics.com/tv/?v=L5rVH1KGBCY.
- 14 Björk BC, Solomon D. Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact. BMC Med 2012; 10: 73.
- 15 Laakso M, Welling P, Bukvova H, Nyman L, Björk BC, Hedlund T. The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS One 2011; 06: e20961.
- 16 Kurata K, Morioka T, Yokoi K, Matsubayashi M. Remarkable growth of open access in the biomedical field: analysis of PubMed articles from 2006 to 2010. PLoS One 2013; 8: e60925.
- 17 Butler D. Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing. Nature 2013; 495 (7442) 433-435.
- 18 Haug C. The downside of open-access publishing. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 791-793.
- 19 Shen C, Björk BC. ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Med 2015; 13: 230.