Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2017; 56(01): 40-45
DOI: 10.3414/ME15-02-0006
Wearable Therapy
Schattauer GmbH

Person-generated Data in Self-quantification

A Health Informatics Research Program
Kathleen Gray
1   Health and Biomedical Informatics Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
,
Fernando J. Martin-Sanchez
2   Department of Healthcare Policy and Research Division of Health Informatics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
,
Guillermo H. Lopez-Campos
1   Health and Biomedical Informatics Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
,
Manal Almalki
1   Health and Biomedical Informatics Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
,
Mark Merolli
1   Health and Biomedical Informatics Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
› Author AffiliationsThe University of Melbourne Institute for a Broadband Enabled Society provided partial funding for the work described in this paper.
Further Information

Publication History

received: 18 October 2015

accepted in revised form: 13 June 2016

Publication Date:
22 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: The availability of internet-connected mobile, wearable and ambient consumer technologies, direct-to-consumer e-services and peer-to-peer social media sites far outstrips evidence about the efficiency, effectiveness and efficacy of using them in healthcare applications. The aim of this paper is to describe one approach to build a program of health informatics research, so as to generate rich and robust evidence about health data and information processing in self-quantification and associated healthcare and health outcomes.

Methods: The paper summarises relevant health informatics research approaches in the literature and presents an example of developing a program of research in the Health and Biomedical Informatics Centre (HaBIC) at the University of Melbourne. The paper describes this program in terms of research infrastructure, conceptual models, research design, research reporting and knowledge sharing.

Results: The paper identifies key outcomes from integrative and multiple-angle approaches to investigating the management of information and data generated by use of this Centre’s collection of wearable, mobiles and other devices in health self-monitoring experiments. These research results offer lessons for consumers, developers, clinical practitioners and biomedical and health informatics researchers.

Conclusions: Health informatics is increasingly called upon to make sense of emerging self-quantification and other digital health phenomena that are well beyond the conventions of healthcare in which the field of informatics originated and consolidated. To make a substantial contribution to optimise the aims, processes and outcomes of health self-quantification needs further work at scale in multi-centre collaborations for this Centre and for health informatics researchers generally.

Keywords

Autoexperimentation - consumer participation - participatory health - research design - self-quantification - telemedicine
 

  • References

  • 1 Hasselmann V, Oesch P, Fernandez-Luque L, Bachmann S. Are exergames promoting mobility an attractive alternative to conventional self-regulated exercises for elderly people in a rehabilitation setting? Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2015; 15: 108.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wang JB, Cadmus-Bertram LA, Natarajan L, White MM, Madanat H, Nichols JF, Ayala GX, Pierce JP. Wearable Sensor/Device (Fitbit One) and SMS Text-Messaging Prompts to Increase Physical Activity in Overweight and Obese Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Telemed J E Health. 2015; 21 (10) 782-792.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Cadmus-Bertram LA, Marcus BH, Patterson RE, Parker BA, Morey BL. Randomized Trial of a Fitbit-Based Physical Activity Intervention for Women. Am J Prev Med. 2015; 49 (03) 414-418. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.01.020.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Carrera P, Dalton A. Do-it-yourself healthcare: The current landscape, prospects and consequences. Maturitas 2014; 77: 37-40.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bouhaddou O, Lambert J, Miller S. Consumer health informatics: knowledge engineering and evaluation studies of medical House Call. Proc AMIA Symp.. 1998: 612-616.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Flaherty D, Hoffman-Goetz L, Arocha J. What is consumer health informatics? A systematic review of published definitions. Inform Health Soc Care. 2014; 40: 91-112.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Forkner-Dunn J. Internet-based patient self-care: the next generation of health care delivery. J Med Internet Res 2003; 5: e8. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.2.e8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Simpson R. Coherent heterogeneity: redefining nursing in a consumer-smart world. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006; 122: 3-8.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Storni C. Report on the “Reassembling Health Workshop: Exploring the Role of the Internet of Things.”. J Participat Med. 2010; 2: e10.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Fox S, Jones S. The Social Life of Health Information: Pew Internet & American Life Project Report 2009. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/2009/PIP_Health_2009.pdf (cited 2015 May 1).
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Medicine 2.0 2011. Fourth World Congress on Social Media and Web 2.0 in Medicine. Health and Biomedical Research. Stanford University; USA: Program. Available from: http://www.medicine20congress.com/ocs/public/conferences/1/sched-Confs/5/program.pdf (cited 2015 May 1).
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Topol E, Steinhubl S, Torkamani A. Digital medical tools and sensors. JAMA. 2015; 313: 353-354.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Almalki M, Martin Sanchez F, Gray K. Self-Quantification: The Informatics of Personal Data Management for Health and Fitness. IBES White Paper.. 2013 Available from: http://www.broadband.unimelb.edu.au/publications/2013/Self-Quantification.pdf (cited 2015 May 1).
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R. et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009; 42: 377-381.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Boyle D, Rafael N. BioGrid Australia and GRHA-NITETM: privacy-protecting subject matching. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011; 168: 24-34.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Shilton K, Estrin D. Ethical issues in participatory sensing. CORE Issues in Professional and Research Ethics.. 2012 1 paper 5. Available from: https://www.nationalethicsresourcecenter.net/resources/724/download/Shilton.pdf (cited 2015 May 1).
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Vayena E, Tasioulas J. Adapting standards: ethical oversight of participant-led health research. PLoS Med. 2013; 10: e1001402. doi: 10.1371/journal. pmed.1001402.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Whooley M, Ploderer B, Gray K. On the integration of self-tracking data amongst Quantified Self members. Proceedings of the 28th International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference.. London: British Computer Society; 2014: 151-160.
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Clark K, Duckham M, Guillemin M. et al. Guidelines for the Ethical Use of Digital Data in Human Research.. Melbourne: Carlton Connect Initiative, University of Melbourne; 2015. Available from: https://www.carltonconnect.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Ethical-Use-of-Digital-Data.pdf.
  • 20 Valdez R, Brennan P. Exploring patients’ health information communication practices with social network members as a foundation for consumer health IT design. Int J Med Inform. 2015; 84: 363-374.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Martin Sanchez F, Lopez Campos G, Gray K. Biomedical informatics methods for personalized medicine and participatory health. Sarker N. Methods in Biomedical Informatics: A Pragmatic Approach.. London: Academic Press; 2013: 347-385.
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Friedman C. What informatics is and isn’t. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013; 20: 224-226.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Pickard K, Swan M. Big desire to share big health data: a shift in consumer attitudes toward personal health information. 2014 AAAI Spring Symposium Series.. Available from: http://www.researchgate.net/profile/K_Thomas_Pickard2/publication/261875975_Big_Desire_to_Share_Big_Health_Data_A_Shift_in_Consumer_Attitudes_toward_Personal_Health_Information/links/0deec53a1eb3cd511c000000.pdf (cited 2015 May 1).
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Almalki M, Gray K, Martin Sanchez F. The use of self-quantification systems for personal health information: big data management activities and prospects. Health Information Science and Systems. 2015; 3 (Suppl. 011) S1.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Wild C. Complementing the genome with an “exposome”: the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005; 14: 1847-1850.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Martin Sanchez F, Gray K, Bellazzi R. et al. Exposome informatics: considerations for the design of future biomedical research information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014; 21: 386-390.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lopez-Campos G, Lopez-Alonso V, Martin-Sanchez F. Is precision medicine different from personalised medicine? A biomedical informatics perspective. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014; 202: 20-23.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Baird A. Making the case for leveraging the patient-centered e-health (PCEH) context to expand information systems theory. Communications of the Association for Information Systems.. 2014 34. article 18.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Neuhauser L, Kreps G. Integrating design science theory and methods to improve the development and evaluation of health communication programs. J Health Commun. 2014; 19: 1460-1471.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 El-Gayar O, Sarnikar S, Wahbeh A. On the design of IT-enabled self-care systems: a socio-technical perspective. 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).. IEEE; 2013: 2484-2493.
    Google Scholar
  • 31 van Gemert-Pijnen J, Nijland N, van Limburg M. et al. A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact of eHealth technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13: e111. doi:10.2196/jmir.1672.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Wilson T. Activity theory and information seeking. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. 2008; 42: 119-161.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Almalki M, Gray K, Martin Sanchez F. Activity theory as a theoretical framework for health self-quantification: a systematic review of empirical studies. J Med Internet Res. 2016; 18: e131. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5000.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Smarr L. Quantifying your body: a how-to guide from a systems biology perspective. Biotechnology Journal. 2012; 7: 980-991.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Punnoose B, Gray K. Comparative evaluation of two systems for integrating biometric data from self-quantification. Yin X, Ho K, Zeng D, Aickelin U, Zhou R, Wang H. Health Information Science. Lecture Notes in Computer Science.. Vol. 9085 New York: Springer International Publishing; 2015: 195-201. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319 -19156-0_20.
    Google Scholar
  • 36 JASON, MITRE Corp. Data for individual health. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2014. Publication No. 15-0006-EF. Available from: http://healthit.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/2014-jason-data-for-individual-health.pdf (cited 2015 May 1).
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Maeder A, Gray K, Borda A, Poultney N, Basilakis J. Achieving greater consistency in telehealth project evaluations to improve organisational learning. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015; 209: 84-94.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Talmon J, Ammenwerth E, Brender J. et al. STARE-HI – Statement on reporting of evaluation studies in Health Informatics. Int J Med Inform. 2009; 78 (01) 1-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Gibbons M, Wilson R, Samal L. et al. Impact of consumer health informatics applications. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2009.. Publication No. 09(10)-E019. Available from: http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/evidence-based-reports/chiapp-evidence-report.pdf (cited 2015 May 1).
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Eysenbach G. CONSORT-EHEALTH Group. CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13: 3126. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1923.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Stopczynski A, Pietri R, Pentland A. et al. Privacy in Sensor-Driven Human Data Collection: A Guide for Practitioners. 2014 Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.5299 (cited 2015 May 1).
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Lopez-Campos G, Almalki M, Martin-Sanchez F. Proposal for a standardised reporting guideline to annotate health-related self-quantification experiments. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014; 202: 79-82.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Swan M. Health 2050: the realization of personalized medicine through crowdsourcing, the Quantified Self, and the participatory biocitizen. J Pers Med. 2012; 2: 93-118.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Merolli M, Gray K, Martin-Sanchez F. Social media and online survey: tools for knowledge management in health research. Warren J, Gray K. Seventh Australasian Workshop on Health Informatics and Knowledge Management (HIKM 2014).. Auckland, New Zealand: Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology (CRPIT); 2014: 21-29.
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Almalki M, Martin Sanchez F, Gray K. Quantifying the activities of self-quantifiers: management of data, time and health. MEDINFO 2015: EHealth-enabled Health: Proceedings of the 15th World Congress on Health and Biomedical Informatics 216: 333 IOS Press.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Merolli M, Gray K, Martin-Sanchez F. et al. Patient-reported outcomes and therapeutic affor-dances of social media: findings from a global online survey of people with chronic pain. J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17: e20. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3915.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Dattakumar A, Lane R, Advocat J. et al. Integrated Home Telehealth Project Evaluation: Evaluation of Health Care and Health System Impacts of an Australian Integrated Home Telehealth Project 2013-2014. Health and Biomedical Informatics Centre, University of Melbourne; 2014
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Gray K, Bright G, Martin Sanchez F. et al. E-collaboration in biomedical research: human factors and social media. Rodrigues J. Advancing Medical Practice through Technology: Applications for Healthcare Delivery, Management, and Quality.. Hershey PA: Medical Information Science Reference; 2014: 102-120.
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Diamandis E. The hundred person wellness project and Google’s baseline study: medical revolution or unnecessary and potentially harmful over-testing?. BMC Med. 2015; 13: 5. doi:10.1186/ s12916-014-0239-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar