Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2016; 55(03): 203-214
DOI: 10.3414/ME14-01-0052
Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

A Cloud Architecture for Teleradiology-as-a-Service[*]

Eriksson J. Melício Monteiro
1   University of Aveiro, DETI / IEETA, Aveiro, Portugal
,
Carlos Costa
1   University of Aveiro, DETI / IEETA, Aveiro, Portugal
,
José L. Oliveira
1   University of Aveiro, DETI / IEETA, Aveiro, Portugal
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received: 02 June 2014

accepted: 09 January 2016

Publication Date:
08 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Background: Telemedicine has been promoted by healthcare professionals as an efficient way to obtain remote assistance from specialised centres, to get a second opinion about complex diagnosis or even to share knowledge among practitioners. The current economic restrictions in many countries are increasing the demand for these solutions even more, in order to optimize processes and reduce costs. However, despite some technological solutions already in place, their adoption has been hindered by the lack of usability, especially in the set-up process. Objectives: In this article we propose a tele-medicine platform that relies on a cloud computing infrastructure and social media principles to simplify the creation of dynamic user-based groups, opening up opportunities for the establishment of teleradiology trust domains.

Methods: The collaborative platform is provided as a Software-as-a-Service solution, supporting real time and asynchronous collaboration between users. To evaluate the solution, we have deployed the platform in a private cloud infrastructure. The system is made up of three main components – the collaborative framework, the Medical Management Information System (MMIS) and the HTML5 (Hyper Text Markup Language) Web client application – connected by a message-oriented middleware.

Results: The solution allows physicians to create easily dynamic network groups for synchronous or asynchronous cooperation. The network created improves dataflow between colleagues and also knowledge sharing and cooperation through social media tools. The platform was implemented and it has already been used in two distinct scena -rios: teaching of radiology and tele-reporting.

Conclusions: Collaborative systems can simplify the establishment of telemedicine expert groups with tools that enable physicians to improve their clinical practice. Stream -lining the usage of this kind of systems through the adoption of Web technologies that are common in social media will increase the quality of current solutions, facilitating the sharing of clinical information, medical imaging studies and patient diagnostics among collaborators.

Keywords

Telemedicine - teleradiology - cloud computing - medical imaging - PACS - DICOM - XMPP

* Supplementary material published on our website http://dx.doi.org/10.3414/ME14-01-0052


 

  • References

  • 1 Montagnant J, Duque H, Pierson JM, Breton V, Brunie L, Magnin IE. Medical Image Content-Based Queries using the Grid. HealthGrid 2003; pp 138-147.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Viitanen J, Kiuru A, Heiska K, Kärkkäinen A, Kormano M. Finnish PACS project. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 1991; 36 2-3 99-102.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Beard DV, Parrish DM, Stevenson D. Cost analysis of film image management and four PACS systems. Medical Imaging 1990: 7-10.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Meenan C, Daly B, Toland C, Nagy P. Use of a Thin-Section Archive and Enterprise 3D Software for Long-Term Storage ofThin-Slice CT Data Sets. Journal of Digital Imaging 2006; 19 (Suppl. 01) 84-88.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Yakami M, Ishizu K, Kubo T, Okada T, Togashi K. Development and Evaluation of a Low-Cost and High-Capacity DICOMImage Data Storage System for Research. Journal of Digital Imaging 2011; 24 (Suppl. 02) 190-195.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Huang HK. PACS and Imaging Informatics: Basic Principles and Applications. Wiley; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Pianykh OS. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM): A Practical Introduction and Survival Guide. Springer Science & Business Media; 2009. p 417.
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Costa C, Silva A, Oliveira JL. Current Perspectives on PACS and Cardiology Case Study. Advanced Computational Intelligence Paradigms in Health-care – 2. Berlin: Springer; 2007. pp 79-108.
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Valente F, Viana-Ferreira C, Costa C, Oliveira JL. A RESTful Image Gateway for Multiple Medical Image Repositories. Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 2012; 16 (Suppl. 03) 356-364.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Costa C, Ferreira C, Bastião L, Ribeiro L, Silva A, Oliveira JL. Dicoogle – an open source peer-to-peer PACS. Journal of Digital Imaging 2011; 24 (Suppl. 05) 848-856.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Voorsluys W, Broberg J, Buyya R. Introduction to Cloud Computing. Cloud Computing: Principles and paradigms. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2011. pp 1-41.
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons 2010; 53 (Suppl. 01) 59-68.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Chou W-YS, Hunt YM, Beckjord EB, Moser RP, Hesse BW. Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication. Journal of medical Internet research 2009; 11 (Suppl. 04) e48.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Huang HK. PACS and imaging informatics: basic principles and applications. John Wiley & Sons; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Buyya R, Broberg J, Goscinski AM. Cloud computing: Principles and paradigms. John Wiley & Sons; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Cerami E. Web services essentials: distributed applications with XML-RPC, SOAP, UDDI & WSDL. O’Reilly Media, Incorporated 2002 p 288.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Allamaraju S. RESTful Web Services Cookbook. O’Reilly Media; 2010. p 316.
    Google Scholar
  • 18 McCarthy CJ, Gerstenmaier JF, O’Neill AC, McEvoy SH, Hegarty C, Heffernan EJ. “EcoRadiology” – Pulling the Plug on Wasted Energy in the Radiology Department. Academic Radiology 2014; 21 (Suppl. 12) 1563-1566.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Yoo S, Kim S, Kim T, Baek R-M, Suh CS, Chung CY. et al. Economic analysis of cloud-based desktop virtualization implementation at a hospital. BMC medical informatics and decision making 2012; 12 (Suppl. 01) 1.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Philbin J, Prior F, Nagy P. Will the next generation of PACS be sitting on a cloud?. Journal of digital imaging 2011; 24 (Suppl. 02) 179-183.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bastião L, Costa C, Oliveira JL. Strengths and weaknesses regarding support of medical images repositories over the cloud. Imaging Management 2012; 11 (Suppl. 05) 14-15.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Maheu M, Whitten P, Allen A. E-Health, Tele-health, and Telemedicine: A Guide to Startup and Success. John Wiley & Sons; 2002. p 400.
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Bagchi S. Telemedicine in Rural India. PLoS Medicine 2006; 3 (Suppl. 03) e82.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lu Q, Koutsakis P. Fair and Efficient Scheduling for Telemedicine Traffic Transmission over Wireless Cellular Networks. IEEE 69th Vehicular Technology Conference. 2009 pp 1-5.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Chorbev I, Mihajlov M, Jolevski I. WiMAX supported telemedicine as part of an integrated system for e-medicine. IEEE 30th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces. 2008 pp 589-594.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Sending dental x-rays by telegraph. Dent Radiogr Photogr. 1929. 6-12.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kumar S. Introduction to Teleradiology. Teleradiology. Berlin: Springer; 2008. pp 1-9.
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Fernàndez-Bayó J, Barbero O, Rubies C, Sentís M, Donoso L. Distributing Medical Images with Internet Technologies: ADICOM Web Server and a DICOM Java Viewer 1. Radiographics 2000; 20 (Suppl. 02) 581-590.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Eng J. Improving the interactivity and functionality of Web-based radiology teaching files with the Java programming language. Radiographics 1997; 17 (Suppl. 06) 1567-1574.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Mahmoudi SE, Akhondi-Asl A, Rahmani R, Faghih-Roohi S, Taimouri V, Sabouri A. et al. Web-based interactive 2D/3D medical image processing and visualization software. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 2010; 98 (Suppl. 02) 172-182.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Silicon Graphics I. The Virtual Reality Modeling Language (VRML). [16-05-2014]. Available from: http://www.web3d.org/x3d/specifications/vrml/VRML1.0/index.html.
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Arguiñarena EJC, Macchi JE, Escobar PP, del Fresno M, Massa JM, Santiago MA. Dcm-Ar: A fast Flash-based Web-PACSviewer for displaying large DICOM images. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2010 pp 3463-3466.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Monteiro EJ, Costa C, Oliveira JL. A DICOM Viewer based on Web Technology. IEEE 15th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (IEEE Healthcom) 2013 pp 167-171.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Lyytinen K, Yoo Y. Ubiquitous computing. Communications of the ACM 2002; 42 (Suppl. 12) 63-96.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Costa C, Oliveira JL. Telecardiology through ubiquitous Internet services. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2012; 81 (Suppl. 09) 612-621.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Bardram E. Activity-based computing: support for mobility and collaboration in ubiquitous computing. Personal Ubiquitous Computing 2005; 9 (Suppl. 05) 312-322.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Chao-Tung Y, Lung-Teng C, Wei-Li C, KuanChieh W. Implementation of a Medical Image File Accessing System on CloudComputing. IEEE 13th International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE); 2010 pp 321-326.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Chenghao H, Xi J, Zhanxiang Z, Tian X. A cloud computing solution for Hospital Information System. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems (ICIS); 2010 pp 517-520.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Bastiao Silva LA, Costa C, Silva A, Oliveira JL. A PACS Gateway to the Cloud. IEEE 6th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI); 2011 pp 1-6.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Doukas C, Pliakas T, Maglogiannis I. Mobile healthcare information management utilizing cloud computing and android OS. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); 2010 pp 1037-1040.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Viana-Ferreira C, Ferreira D, Valente F, Monteiro E, Costa C, Oliveira JL. Dicoogle Mobile: a medical imaging platform for Android. Studies in health technology and informatics 2012 p 502.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Porumb C, Porumb S, Orza B, Budura D. Computer-Supported Collaborative Work and Its Application to E-Health. IEEE 3rd International Conference on Advances in Mesh Networks (MESH) 2010 pp 75-80.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Gaillard F, Jones J. Collaborative Radiology Resources: Radiopaedia.org as an Example of a Web 2.0 Radiology Resource. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2009 192. 05
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Kahn Jr CE, Thao C. GoldMiner: a radiology image search engine. American Journal of Roentgenology 2007; 188 (Suppl. 06) 1475-1478.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Weinberger E, Jakobovits R, Halsted M. MyPACS.net: a Web-based teaching file authoring tool. American Journal of Roentgenology 2002; 179 (Suppl. 03) 579-582.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Minnie A. AuntMinnie.com Launches New Resource Focused on Diagnostic Imaging Centers. Tucson, Arizona: 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Jive.. Openfire. Available from: http://www.ignite/realtime.org/projects/openfire.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 XMPP.. The xmpp standards foundation. Available from: http://xmpp.org.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Hornsby A, Walsh R. From instant messaging to cloud computing, an XMPP review. IEEE 14th International Symposium on Consumer Electronics (ISCE); 2010 pp 1-6.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Arnold J. Openstack Swift: Using, Administering, and Developing for Swift Object Storage. O’Reilly Media, Inc.; 2014. p 338.
    Google Scholar
  • 51 Saint-Andre P. Extensible messaging and presence protocol (XMPP). Core. 2011
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine: Supplement 142 – Clinical Trial De-identification Profiles. Available from: ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/final/sup142_ft.pdf.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Freymann JB, Kirby JS, Perry JH, Clunie DA, Jaffe CC. Image data sharing for biomedical research – meeting HIPAA requirements for de-identification. Journal of digital imaging 2012; 25 (Suppl. 01) 14-24.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Committee DS. Working Group 6 Printer Ad Hoc: Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM). Supplement 22: Presentation Look Up Table (LUT). 1998
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Vazquez-Naya J, Loureiro J, Calle J, Vidal J, Sierra A. Necessary security mechanisms in a PACS DICOM access system with Web technology. Journal of Digital Imaging 2002; 15: 107-111.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Kallepalli VV, Ehikioya S, Camorlinga S, Rueda J. Security Middleware Infrastructure for DICOM Images in Health Information Systems. Journal of Digital Imaging 16 (Suppl. 04) 356-364.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Pereira J, Lamelo A, Vazquez-Naya JM, Fernandez M, Lopez-Gestal JM, Teijero J. et al. Design and implementation of a DICOM PACS with secure access via Internet. IEEE 23rd Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2001 pp 3724-3727.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Ribeiro L, Viana-Ferreira C, Oliveira J, Costa C. XDS-I outsourcing proxy: ensuring confidentiality while preserving interoperability. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 2013; 18 (Suppl. 04) 1404-1412.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Reiner BI, Salkever D, Siegel EL, Hooper FJ, Siddiqui KM, Musk A. Multi-institutional Analysis of Computed and Direct Radiography Part II, Economic Analysis. Radiology 2005; 236 (Suppl. 02) 420-426.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Locust.io.. Locust – A modern load testing framework 2014. Available from: http://locust.io.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar