Use of Logistic Regression for Developing Risk-adjusted Quality Indicators in Nursing

Summary

Objectives: A low rate of newly developed pressure ulcers is considered as an important quality indicator in nursing. However, the result of a hospital depends not only on the quality of care but on the risk profile of its patients as well. Therefore, based on multiple logistic regression models we describe a method for calculating risk-adjusted quality indicators in nursing.

Method: Based on data of 1,009,989 patients from 1747 hospitals in 2009, we developed two multiple logistic regression models to identify and to weigh a possible joint influence of several risk factors on newly developed pressure ulcers. In a further step, we calculated risk-adjusted rates.

Results: Factors remaining in the regression models were “micro-movements on admission”, “diabetes mellitus”, “age” and “days on intensive care unit”. Based on the corresponding regression coefficients and the logistic function, the expected rate of newly developed pressure ulcers was calculated for every hospital. Fi nally, expected rates and observed rates both were used to calculate risk-adjusted rates.

Conclusion: The simultaneous consideration of relevant risk factors by means of risk- adjusted quality indicators ensures a fair comparison of hospitals.

Keywords

Risk adjustment - logistic regression - quality indicator - pressure ulcer - nursing

• References

• 1 American Nurse Association (ANA).. ANA’s 10 Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators for Acute Care Settings. 1999 www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ThePracticeofProfessional Nursing/PatientSafetyQuality/NDNQI/Research/QIforAcuteCareSettings.aspx
• 2 Robert-Koch-Institut (RKI).. Dekubitus. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes, Heft 12.; Berlin: 2002
• 3 Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ).. AHRQ Quality Indicators. Guide to Patient Safety Indicators. Version 3.1, 2007. www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/downloads/psi/psi_guide_v31.pdf
• 4 International Quality Indicator Project (IQIP).. List of All Indicators 2002. www.internationalqip.com/indicators.aspx
• 5 Kristensen S, Mainz J, Bartels P. Catalogue of Patient Safety Indicators. Safety Improvement for Patients in Europe: SimPatIE – Work Package 4. European Society for Quality in Health Care (ESQH).; Aarhus: 2007
• 6 Ash AS, Shwartz M, Peköz EA. Comparing Outcomes Across Providers. In: Iezzoni LI. (ed.). Risk Adjustment. 3rd edition. Chicago, Illinois: Health Administration Press; 2003
• 7 Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000
• 8 Whitman GR, Kim Y, Davidson LJ, Wolf GA, Wang S-L. Measuring Nurse-sensitive Patient Outcomes Across Specialty Units. Outcomes Management 2002; 6 (Suppl. 04) 152-159.
• 9 Williams S, Watret L, Pell J. Case-Mix Adjusted Incidence of Pressure Ulcers in Acute Medical and Surgical Wards. Journal of Tissue Viability 2001; 11 (Suppl. 04) 139-142.
• 10 Bours GJ, Halfens RJ, Berger MP, Huijer Abu-Saad H, Grol RT. Development of a Model for Case-Mix Adjustment of Pressure Ulcers Prevalence Rates. Med Care 2003; 41 (Suppl. 01) 45-55.
• 11 Waterlow J. Waterlow: A Risk Assessment Card. Nursing Times 1985; 81 (48) 49-51.