Modeling the Growth of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Abstract

Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) growth is a complex process that is incompletely understood. Significant heterogeneity in growth trajectories between patients has led to difficulties in accurately modeling aneurysm growth across cohorts of patients. We set out to compare four models of aneurysm growth commonly used in the literature and confirm which best fits the patient data of our AAA cohort.

Methods: Patients with AAA were included in the study if they had two or more abdominal ultrasound scans greater than 3 months apart. Patients were censored from analysis once their AAA exceeded 5.5 cm. Four models were applied using the R environment for statistical computing. Growth estimates and goodness of fit (using the Akaike Information Criterion, AIC) were compared, with p-values based on likelihood ratio testing.

Results: Of 510 enrolled patients, 264 met the inclusion criteria, yielding a total of 1861 imaging studies during 932 cumulative years of surveillance. Overall, growth rates were: (1) 0.35 (0.31,0.39) cm/yr in the growth/time calculation, (2) 0.056 (0.042,0.068) cm/yr in the linear regression model, (3) 0.19 (0.17,0.21) cm/yr in the linear multilevel model, and (4) 0.21 (0.18,0.24) cm/yr in the quadratic multilevel model at time 0, slowing to 0.15 (0.12,0.17) cm/yr at 10 years. AIC was lowest in the quadratic multilevel model (1508) compared to other models (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: AAA growth was heterogeneous between patients; the nested nature of the data is most appropriately modeled by multilevel modeling techniques.

Key Words

Abdominal aortic aneurysm - Growth rate - Quadratic - Multilevel modeling

• References

• 1 Vardulaki KA, Walker NM, Day NE, Duffy SW, Ashton HA, Scott RA. Quantifying the risks of hypertension, age, sex and smoking in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 195-200 . 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01353.x
• 2 Filardo G, Powell JT, Martinez MA, Ballard DJ. Surgery for small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 3: CD001835
• 3 Thompson SG, Ashton HA, Gao L, Buxton MJ, Scott RA. Final follow-up of the Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) randomized trial of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 1649-1656 . 10.1002/bjs.8897
• 4 Bown MJ, Sweeting MJ, Brown LC, Powell JT, Thompson SG. Surveillance intervals for small abdominal aortic aneurysms: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2013; 309: 806-813 . 10.1001/jama.2013.950
• 5 Brady AR, Thompson SG, Fowkes FG, Greenhalgh RM, Powell JT. Abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion: risk factors and time intervals for surveillance. Circulation 2004; 110: 16-21 . 10.1161/01.CIR.0000133279.07468.9F
• 6 Darwood R, Earnshaw JJ, Turton G, Shaw E, Whyman M, Poskitt K. , et al. Twenty-year review of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in men in the county of Gloucestershire, United Kingdom. J Vasc Surg 2012; 56: 8-13 . 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.069
• 7 Dunne JA, Bailey MA, Griffin KJ, Sohrabi S, Coughlin PA, Scott DJ. Statins: the holy grail of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) growth attenuation? A systematic review of the literature. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2012
• 8 Bailey MA, Charnell AM, Griffin KJ, Czoski-Murray CJ, Sohrabi S, Rashid ST. , et al. A systematic review of the methodology employed to calculate abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) growth rate. Ultrasound 2011; 19: 197-202 . 10.1258/ult.2011.011040
• 9 Bailey MA, Griffin KJ, Sohrabi S, Whalley DJ, Johnson AB, Baxter PD. , et al. Plasma thrombin-antithrombin complex, prothrombin fragments 1 and 2, and D-dimer levels are elevated after endovascular but not open repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2013; 57: 1512-1518 . 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.030
• 10 Parry DJ, Al-Barjas HS, Chappell L, Rashid ST, Ariëns RA, Scott DJ. Markers of inflammation in men with small abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52: 145-151 . 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.02.279
• 11 Parry DJ, Al-Barjas HS, Chappell L, Rashid T, Ariëns RA, Scott DJ. Haemostatic and fibrinolytic factors in men with a small abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 870-877 . 10.1002/bjs.6632
• 12 Powell J, Brown LC, Forbes JF, Fowkes FG, Greenhalgh RM, Ruckley CV. , et al. Final 12-year follow-up of surgery versus surveillance in the UK Small Aneurysm Trial. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 702-708 . 10.1002/bjs.5778
• 13 Foo FJ, Hammond C, Goldstone A, Abuhamdiah M, Rashid S, West R. , et al. Agreement between computed tomography and ultrasound on abdominal aortic aneurysms and implications on clinical decisions. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 42: 608-614 . 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.07.003
• 14 Draper NR, Smith H. Applied regression analysis. , 3rd edition. Chichester: Wiley Interscience; 1998
• 15 Goldstein H. Multilevel statistical models. , 4th edition. Chichester: Wiley Interscience; 2011
• 16 Pinheiro JC, Bates DM. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2000
• 17 Powell JT, Sweeting MJ, Brown LC, Gotensparre SM, Fowkes FG, Thompson SG. Systematic review and meta-analysis of growth rates of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 609-618 . 10.1002/bjs.7465
• 18 Sweeting MJ, Thompson SG, Brown LC, Greenhalgh RM, Powell JT. Use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors is associated with increased growth rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52: 1-4 . 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.02.264
• 19 Sweeting MJ, Thompson SG, Brown LC, Powell JT. Meta-analysis of individual patient data to examine factors affecting growth and rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 655-665 . 10.1002/bjs.8707
• 20 Thompson A, Cooper JA, Fabricius M, Humphries SE, Ashton HA, Hafez H. An analysis of drug modulation of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth through 25 years of surveillance. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52: 55-61.e2
• 21 Thompson AR, Cooper JA, Ashton HA, Hafez H. Growth rates of small abdominal aortic aneurysms correlate with clinical events. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 37-44 . 10.1002/bjs.6779
• 22 Bell BA, Morgan GB, Schoeneberger JA, Loudermilk BL, Kromrey JD, Ferron JM. Dancing the sample size limbo with mixed models: how low can you go?. SAS Global Forum; Seattle, Washington: 2010: 1-11
• 23 Diggle PJ, Sousa I, Chetwynd AG. Joint modelling of repeated measurements and time-to-event outcomes: the fourth Armitage lecture. Stat Med 2008; 27: 2981-2998 . 10.1002/sim.3131
• 24 Henderson R, Diggle P, Dobson A. Joint modelling of longitudinal measurements and event time data. Biostatistics 2000; 1: 465-480 . 10.1093/biostatistics/1.4.465
• 25 Hartshorne TC, McCollum CN, Earnshaw JJ, Morris J, Nasim A. Ultrasound measurement of aortic diameter in a national screening programme. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 42: 195-199 . 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.02.030