Abstract
Traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta is a life-threatening lesion and it occurs
in 10 to 30% of fatalities from blunt thoracic trauma and is the second most common
cause of death after head injury. Immediate surgery is often characterized by a high
mortality and morbidity rate. Delayed repair of traumatic aortic injuries has significant
survival benefits and a much lower mortality rate compared with early open repair.
Despite developments in operative techniques, there still remains considerable operative
mortality and morbidity associated with a surgical approach even if delayed. Endovascular
stent grafts for the thoracic aorta represents an alternative to the conventional
approach for traumatic aortic rupture. Because of the lower invasivity avoiding thoracotomy
and use of heparin, endovascular repair can be applied in acute patients without the
risk of destabilizing pulmonary, head or abdominal traumatic lesions. However, despite
the good deal of convincing evidence for endovascular treatment for thoracic aortic
diseases and for traumatic aortic injuries as a valid and efficacious alternative
to surgery, several reports show a variety of late complications of thoracic endografts
especially for first-generation stent-grafts. In light of this, is the endovascular
treatment really safe, efficacious and free from complications in the long term? This
manuscript aims to offer a moment of reflection on this important chapter of aortic
pathology.
Key Words
Aortic - Traumatic - Endovascular - Acute injury