Thromb Haemost 2009; 101(05): 988-990
DOI: 10.1160/TH08-11-0741
Letters to the Editor
Schattauer GmbH

Evaluation of the CoaguChek XS Plus system in a Swiss community setting

Andre Deom
1   Quality Control Center Switzerland, Chêne-Bourg, Switzerland
,
Guido Reber
2   University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland
,
Dimitrios A. Tsakiris
3   University Hospital of Basle, Switzerland
,
Francoise-Marie Hannes
4   Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland and Germany
,
Winfried Plesch
4   Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland and Germany
› Author Affiliations
Financial support: This study was sponsored by Roche Diagnostics which is the manufacturer of the system.
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 13 November 2008

Accepted after major revision: 23 February 2009

Publication Date:
24 November 2017 (online)

 

 
  • References

  • 1 Braun S, Watzke H, Hasenkam JM. et al. Performance evaluation of the new CoaguChek XS system compared with the established CoaguChek system by patients experienced in INR-self management. Thromb Haemost 2007; 97: 310-314.
  • 2 Leichsenring I, Plesch W, Unkrig V. et al. Multi-centre ISI assignment and calibration of the INR measuring range of a new point-of-care system designed for home monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy. Thromb Haemost 2007; 97: 856-861.
  • 3 Plesch W, van den Besselaar AMHP. Validation of INR in a New Point-of-Care System Designed for Home Monitoring of Oral Anticoagulation Therapy. Int Jnl Lab Hem 2009; 31: 20-25.
  • 4 Plesch W, Wolf T, Breitenbeck N. et al. Results of the performance verification of the CoaguChek XS system. Thromb Res 2008; 123: 381-389.
  • 5 ISO 17593:2007 standard, 1st edition, 2007–04–15: Clinical laboratory testing and in vitro medical devices – Requirements for in vitro monitoring systems for self-testing of oral anticoagulation therapy.
  • 6 Passing H, Bablok W. A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry, Part I. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1983; 21: 709-720.
  • 7 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 01: 307-310.
  • 8 Hill J. Determination of INR accuracy: Methods of analysis. Haemostasis 1996; 26 (Suppl. 03) A422.