Risk Factors for Birth Canal Lacerations in Primiparous Women

ABSTRACT

Lacerations of the birth canal are common side effects of vaginal birth. They are potentially preventable. Although serious long-term consequences have been identified for severe perineal lacerations, less attention has been paid to lacerations in other locations and how the risk factors vary for different lacerations. We analyzed a dataset including 1009 primiparous women with singleton pregnancies and vaginal deliveries, and we examined risk factors for third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations and periurethral, vaginal, and labial lacerations using logistic regression analysis. Large fetal size (≥ 3500 g) substantially increased the risk of perineal (odd ratio [OR], 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8 to 7.9) and periurethral (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.0 to 5.0) lacerations but not other types of lacerations. Episiotomy had no impact on perineal lacerations (OR 0.9) but had very strong protective effects for other lacerations (OR 0.1). Prolonged second stage of labor (> 120 minutes) increased the risk of perineal and vaginal lacerations but reduced the risk for periurethral lacerations. Instrumental deliveries were significant risk factors for third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations, with by far the strongest effect for low forceps (OR 25.0 versus < 3 for outlet forceps, outlet vacuum, and low vacuum). We concluded that separating different birth canal lacerations is critical in identifying risk factors and potential preventive strategies.

KEYWORDS

Laceration - perineum - duration of second stage - episiotomy

REFERENCES

• 1 Eason E, Labrecque M, Marcoux S, Mondor M. Anal incontinence after childbirth.  CMAJ. 2002;  166 326-330
• 2 Borello-France D, Burgio K L, Richter H E et al.. Fecal and urinary incontinence in primiparous women.  Obstet Gynecol. 2006;  108 863-872
• 3 Crawford L A, Quint E H, Pearl M L, DeLancey J O. Incontinence following rupture of the anal sphincter during delivery.  Obstet Gynecol. 1993;  82 527-531
• 4 Fenner D E, Genberg B, Brahma P, Marek L, DeLancey J O. Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  189 1543-1549 discussion 1549-1550
• 5 Albers L L, Migliaccio L, Bedrick E J, Teaf D, Peralta P. Does epidural analgesia affect the rate of spontaneous obstetric lacerations in normal births?.  J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007;  52 31-36
• 6 Altman D, Ragnar I, Ekstrom A, Tyden T, Olsson S E. Anal sphincter lacerations and upright delivery postures-a risk analysis from a randomized controlled trial.  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;  18 141-146
• 7 Altman M R, Lydon-Rochelle M T. Prolonged second stage of labor and risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review.  Birth. 2006;  33 315-322
• 8 Baumann P, Hammoud A O, McNeeley S G, Derose E, Kudish B, Hendrix S. Factors associated with anal sphincter laceration in 40,923 primiparous women.  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;  18 985-990
• 9 Benavides L, Wu J M, Hundley A F, Ivester T S, Visco A G. The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;  192 1702-1706
• 10 Cheng Y W, Hopkins L M, Caughey A B. How long is too long: does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;  191 933-938
• 11 Christianson L M, Bovbjerg V E, McDavitt E C, Hullfish K L. Risk factors for perineal injury during delivery.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  189 255-260
• 12 Dandolu V, Chatwani A, Harmanli O, Floro C, Gaughan J P, Hernandez E. Risk factors for obstetrical anal sphincter lacerations.  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;  16 304-307
• 13 Lowder J L, Burrows L J, Krohn M A, Weber A M. Risk factors for primary and subsequent anal sphincter lacerations: a comparison of cohorts by parity and prior mode of delivery.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;  196 344.e1-5
• 14 Samuelsson E, Ladfors L, Wennerholm U B, Gareberg B, Nyberg K, Hagberg H. Anal sphincter tears: prospective study of obstetric risk factors.  BJOG. 2000;  107 926-931
• 15 Senecal J, Xiong X, Fraser W D. Effect of fetal position on second-stage duration and labor outcome.  Obstet Gynecol. 2005;  105 763-772
• 16 Sheiner E, Walfisch A, Hallak M, Harlev S, Mazor M, Shoham-Vardi I. Length of the second stage of labor as a predictor of perineal outcome after vaginal delivery.  J Reprod Med. 2006;  51 115-119
• 17 Wu J M, Williams K S, Hundley A F, Connolly A, Visco A G. Occiput posterior fetal head position increases the risk of anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted deliveries.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;  193 525-528 discussion 528-529
• 18 Zhang J, Yancey M K, Klebanoff M A, Schwarz J, Schweitzer D. Does epidural analgesia prolong labor and increase risk of cesarean delivery? A natural experiment.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;  185 128-134
• 19 Johanson R B, Rice C, Doyle M et al.. A randomised prospective study comparing the new vacuum extractor policy with forceps delivery.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;  100 524-530
• 20 Johnson J H, Figueroa R, Garry D, Elimian A, Maulik D. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries.  Obstet Gynecol. 2004;  103 513-518
• 21 Meyer L, Mailloux J, Marcoux S, Blanchet P, Meyer F. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in instrumental deliveries with the Kobayashi vacuum extractor and low forceps.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1987;  66 643-647
• 22 Bofill J A, Rust O A, Schorr S J et al.. A randomized prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus the M-cup vacuum extractor.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;  175 1325-1330
• 23 Shiono P, Klebanoff M A, Carey J C. Midline episiotomies: more harm than good?.  Obstet Gynecol. 1990;  75 765-770
• 24 Minaglia S M, Ozel B, Gatto N M, Korst L, Mishell Jr D R, Miller D A. Decreased rate of obstetrical anal sphincter laceration is associated with change in obstetric practice.  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;  18 1399-1404
• 25 Hartmann K, Viswanathan M, Palmieri R, Gartlehner G, Thorp Jr J, Lohr K N. Outcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic review.  JAMA. 2005;  293 2141-2148
• 26 Carroli G, Belizan J, Stamp G. Episiotomy for vaginal birth.  Birth. 1999;  26 263
• 27 Ecker J L, Tan W M, Bansal R K, Bishop J T, Kilpatrick S J. Is there a benefit to episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery? Observations over ten years in a stable population.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;  176 411-414
• 28 Bansal R K, Tan W M, Ecker J L, Bishop J T, Kilpatrick S J. Is there a benefit to episiotomy at spontaneous vaginal delivery? A natural experiment.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;  175 897-901
• 29 Fitzgerald M P, Weber A M, Howden N, Cundiff G W, Brown M B. Risk factors for anal sphincter tear during vaginal delivery.  Obstet Gynecol. 2007;  109 29-34
• 30 Albers L, Garcia J, Renfrew M, McCandlish R, Elbourne D. Distribution of genital tract trauma in childbirth and related postnatal pain.  Birth. 1999;  26 11-17