Download PDF
Aktuelle Neurologie 2008; 35(6): 275-279
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1067410
Aktuelles Thema

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Was ist das Besondere an der Neurologischen Rehabilitation?

Ankündigung einer Reihe „Fortschritte der Neurologischen Rehabilitation”What is Special in Neurological Rehabilitation?Announcement of the Series „Progress in Neurological Rehabiliation”C.-W.  Wallesch1 , E.  Koenig2
  • 1Universitätsklinik für Neurologie, Magdeburg
  • 2Neurologische Klinik Bad Aibling
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 May 2008 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Der Artikel stellt die Besonderheiten der Neurologischen Rehabilitation dar und gibt Informationen über Leistungsmengen, Phasen, den rehabilitationspflichtigen Defiziten zugrunde liegende Erkrankungen, Wirksamkeit, Trends und die Teilhabe längerfristig beeinträchtigende Krankheitsfolgen. Er soll in die von den Herausgebern der Aktuellen Neurologie initiierte Reihe „Fortschritte der Neurologischen Rehabilitation” einführen und den hohen Stellenwert der Rehabilitation in der Neurologie verdeutlichen.

Abstract

This article provides a description of the special features of neurological rehabilitation. It provides information concerning volume, phases, kinds of deficits requiring rehabilitation and underlying diseases, effectiveness, future developments and long-term disabilities. The editors of the „Aktuelle Neurologie” have initiated a series entitled „Progress in Neurological Rehabilitation” that is introduced here. The importance of neurological rehabilitation within the field of neurology is emphasised.

Schlüsselwörter

neurologische Rehabilitation - Organisation - Wirksamkeit - Leitlinien

Key words

neurological rehabilitation - organisation - effectiveness - guidelines

Literatur

  • 1 Graf T. Statistische Krankenhausdaten: Grund- und Kostendaten der Vorsorge- oder Rehabilitationseinrichtungen. In: Klauber J, Robra B-P, Schellschmidt H (Hrsg) Krankenhaus-Report 2007. Stuttgart; Schattauer 2007: 371-390
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Bölt U. Statistische Krankenhausdaten: Grund- und Kostendaten der Krankenhäuser. In: Klauber J, Robra B-P, Schellschmidt H (Hrsg) Krankenhaus-Report 2007. Stuttgart; Schattauer 2007: 277-308
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft für Rehabilitation (BAR) .Empfehlungen zur Neurologischen Rehabilitation von Patienten mit schweren und schwersten Hirnschädigungen in den Phasen B und C. Frankfurt am Main; BAR/VdR 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Hoffmann B, Karbe H, Krusch C. et al . Patientencharakteristika in der neurologisch/neurochirurgischen Frührehabilitation (Phase B): Eine multizentrische Erfassung im Jahr 2002 in Deutschland.  Akt Neurol. 2006;  33 287-296
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Wood R L. The rehabilitation team. In: Greenwood RJ, Barnes MP, McMillan TM, Ward CD (eds) Handbook of Neurological Rehabilitation, 2ed. Hove; Psychology Press 2003: 41-50
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Bölsche F, Hasenbein U, Reisberg H. et al . Ergebnisse der ambulanten und stationären Rehabilitation in den ersten sechs Monaten nach Schlaganfall.  Fortschr Neurol Pychiat. 2003;  71 458-468
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Schlote A, Richter M, Frank B, Wallesch C W. A longitudinal study on health-related quality of life of first stroke survivors' close relatives.  Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;  22 137-142
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rittman M, Boylstein C, Hinojosa R. et al . Transition experiences of stroke survivors following discharge.  Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;  14 21-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Barnes M P. Organisation of neurological rehabilitation services. In: Greenwood RJ, Barnes MP, McMillan TM, Ward CD (eds) Handbook of Neurological Rehabilitation, 2ed. Hove; Psychology Press 2003: 29-40
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Hui E, Lum C M, Woo J. et al . Outcomes of elderly stroke patients. Day hospital versus conventional management.  Stroke. 1995;  26 1616-1619
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Indredavik B, Bakke F, Stordahl S A. et al . Stroke unit treatment improves long-term quality of life.  Stroke. 1998;  29 895-899
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Landi F, Cesari M, Onder G. et al . Effects of an occupational therapy program on functional outcome in older stroke patients.  Gerontology. 2006;  52 85-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Semlyen J K, Summers S J, Barnes M P. Traumatic brain injury: efficacy of multidisciplinary rehabilitation.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;  79 678-683
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kwakkel G, Kollen B J, Wagenaar R C. Long-term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomized trial.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat. 2002;  72 473-479
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Pohl M, Mehrholz J, Ritschel C, Ruckriem S. Speed-dependet treadmill training in ambulatory hemiparetic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial.  Stroke. 2002;  33 553-558
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Sterr A, Freivogel S. Motor improvement following intensive training in low-functioning chronic hemiparesis.  Neurology. 2003;  61 842-844
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Wallesch C W, Johannsen-Horbach H. Computers in aphasia therapy – effects and side-effects.  Aphasiology. 2004;  18 223-228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Grealy M A, Johnson D A, Rushton S K. Improving cognitive function after brain injury: the use of exercise and virtual reality.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;  80 661-667
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Webster J S, McFarland P T, Rapport L J. et al . Computer-assisted training for improving wheelchair mobility in unilateral neglect patients.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;  82 769-775
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Scheidtmann K, Fries W, Müller F, Koenig E. Effect of levodopa in combination with physiotherapy on motor recovery after stroke: a prospective, randomised, double-blind study.  Lancet. 2001;  358 787-790
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Huber W, Willmes K, Poeck K. et al . Piracetam as an adjuvant to language therapy for aphasia: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;  78 245-250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Zhang L, Plotkin R C, Wang G. et al . Cholinergic augmentation with donepezil enhances recovery in short-term memory and sustained attention after traumatic brain injury.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;  85 1050-1055
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Silver J M, Koumaras B, Chen M. et al . Effects of rivastigmine on cognitive function in patients with traumatic brain injury.  Neurology. 2006;  67 748-755
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Krupp L B, Christodolou C, Melville P. et al . Donepezil improved memory in multiple sclerosis in a randomized clinical trial.  Neurology. 2004;  63 1579-1585
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Whyte J, Hart T, Vaccaro M. et al . Effects of methylphenidate on attentional functions after traumatic brain inury: a multidimensional, randomized, controlled trial.  Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;  83 401-420
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Cappa S F, Benke T, Clarke S. et al . EFNS guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation: report of an EFNS task force.  Eur J Neurol. 2005;  12 665-680
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Herrmann M, Wallesch C W. Depressive changes in stroke patients.  Disabil Rehabil. 1993;  15 55-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Engbert A W, Teasdale T W. Psychosocial outcome following traumatic brain injury in adults: a long-term population based follow-up.  Brain Inj. 2004;  18 533-545
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Teasdale T W, Engberg A W. Psychosocial consequences of stroke: a long-term population-based follow-up.  Brain Inj. 2005;  19 1049-1058
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Schlote A, Wallesch C W. Psychosoziale Folgen neurologischer Erkrankungen.  Neurol Rehabil. 2007;  13 61-65
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Barskova T, Wilz G. Interdependence of stroke survivors' recovery and their relatives' attitudes and health: a contribution to investigating the causal effects.  Disbil Rehabil. 2007;  29 1481-1491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Arabia G, Grossardt B R, Geda Y E. et al . Increased risk of depressive and anxiety disorders in relatives of patients with Parkinson disease.  Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;  64 1385-1392
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Janssens A C, van Doorn P A, de Poer J B. et al . Impact of recently diagnosed multiple sclerosis on quality of life, anxiety, depression and distress of patients and partners.  Acta Neurol Scand. 2003;  108 389-395
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Clark M S, Rubenach S, Winsor A. A randomized controlled trial of an education and counselling intervention for families after stroke.  Clin Rehabil. 2003;  17 703-712
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Wilz G, Barskova Z. Evaluation of a cognitive behavioral group intervention program for spouses of stroke patients.  Behav Res Ther. 2007;  45 2508-2517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Prof. Dr. med. C.-W. Wallesch

Neurologische Klinik

Am Tannwald 1

79215 Elzach

Email: claus.wallesch@neuroklinik-elzach.de

      >