Planta Med 2007; 73 - P_472
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-987252

Protective properties of quercetin and luteolin from Petasites japonicus leaves against Aβ (25–35)-induced neurotoxicity in B103 cells

M Jun 2, JM Hur 1, EJ Yang 1, DG Lee 1, SY Lee 1, KS Song 1
  • 1College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702–701, Korea
  • 2Division of Food Science, Dong-A University, 840 Hadan-2-dong, Saha-gu, Busan 604–714, Korea

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder clinically characterized by progressive dementia that inevitably leads to incapacitation and death [1]. A pathologic hallmark of AD is the formation of extracellular senile plaques composed of 40–42 amino acid Aβ peptides, a product of amyloid precursor protein (APP) proteolysis [2]. Aβ fragments have shown to induce oxidative stress and inflammation in the brain, which are postulated to play important roles in the pathogenesis of AD [3]. In the course of screening anti-dementia agents from natural products, two compounds with the potent protective activity toward Aβ (25–35)-induced neurotoxicity were isolated from the ethyl acetate soluble fraction of Petasites japonicus leaves. Open column chromatographic separation with silica gel (Merck Art.7734, CH2Cl2-CH3OH=10:1 to 4:1) afforded two active principles. By means of 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR and LC/MS spectral analyses, they were identified as luteolin (1) and quercetin (2). At the concentration range of 1–50µM, 1 and 2 remarkably raised survival rate of the Aβ (25–35)-treated B103 neuroblastoma cells in both 3-[4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and Hoechst 33342 staining. 1 and 2 also completely inhibited Aβ (25–35)-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation in B103 cells at 50µM. These results suggested that 1 and 2 might be a starting point for rational natural products-based drug design and be useful reagents for studying mechanism of Alzheimer's disease.

References: [1] Sisoida S.S. et al. (1995) FASEB J. 9: 366–370.. [2] Vassar R. (2002) Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 54: 1589–602. [3] Miranda S. et al. (2000) Prog. Neurobiol. 62: 633–648.