Effektivität der Forced-use-Therapie bei Patienten 3 bis 9 Monate nach Schlaganfall

Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D, Giuliani C, Light KE, Nichols-Larsen D. JAMA 2006; 296: 2095 - 2104

Literatur

• 1 Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories.  Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;  22 281-299
• 2 Luft A R, Hanley D F. Stroke recovery - moving in an EXCITE-ing direction.  Jama. 2006;  296 2141-2143
• 3 Sterr A, Elbert T, Berthold I. et al . Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory study.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;  83 1374-1377
• 4 Taub E, Ellman S J, Berman A J. Deafferentation in monkeys: effect on conditioned grasp response.  Science. 1966;  151 593-594
• 5 Taub E, Perrella P, Barro G. Behavioral development after forelimb deafferentation on day of birth in monkeys with and without blinding.  Science. 1973;  181 959-960
• 6 Taub E, Uswatte G, King D K. et al . A placebo-controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke.  Stroke. 2006;  37 1045-1049
• 7 Van der Lee J H, Wagenaar R C, Lankhorst G J. et al . Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial.  Stroke. 1999;  30 2369-2375