Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and endoscopy were prospectively performed and compared
to the histopathologic findings of the resection specimens in 24 patients with primary
gastric lymphoma (PGL). On EUS, three types of PGL could be differentiated, a superficial
type (n = 10), an infiltrating type (n = 12) and a tumorous type (n = 2). In the correct
assessment of surface extension of the tumors, endoscopy and EUS agreed in 37,5 %
of cases and EUS showed more extensive disease than endoscopy in 58 % of cases. However,
in comparison to the resection specimens, EUS still underestimated the tumor surface
extension in 37.5 % of cases; this was mainly in low grade malignant PGL. The depth
of tumor infiltration was correctly determined on EUS compared to the resection specimens
in 91.5 % of cases. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of diagnosing lymph node
metastases were 100 %, 80 % and 83 %, respectively. We conclude that EUS is a useful
pre-therapeutic staging tool for primary gastric lymphoma but there remain some problems
in determining the longitudinal and circular tumor spread in order to accurately guide
the extent of gastric resection.