Pharmacopsychiatry 2006; 39(3): 81-84
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-941480
Original Paper
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Performance of the Italian Version of the Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptic (SWN) Scale in Schizophrenic Outpatients

M. Balestrieri1 , G. Giaroli2 , M. Mazzi2 , C. Bellantuono2
  • 1Centro InterUniversitario di Neuroscienze Comportamentali, Dipartimento di Patologia e Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, University of Udine
  • 2Sezione di Psichiatria e Psicologia Clinica, Dipartimento di Medicina e Sanità Pubblica, University of Verona
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 13.6.2005 Revised: 15.10.2005

Accepted: 1.11.2005

Publication Date:
23 May 2006 (online)

Background: Several studies indicate that subjective experience toward antipsychotic drugs (APs) in schizophrenic patients is a key factor in ensuring a smooth recovery from the illness. Objective: The principal aim of this study was to establish the psychometric performance of the Subjective Well-being Under Neuroleptic (SWN) scale in its Italian version and to assess, through the SWN scale, the subjective experience of stabilized psychotic outpatients in maintenance with APs. Methods: The original short version of SWN, consisting of 20 items, was back translated, and a focus group was also conducted to better improve the comprehension of the scale. Results: The results showed a good performance of the Italian version of the SWN as documented by the internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha; 0.85). A satisfactory subjective experience was reported in the sample of schizophrenic outpatients interviewed (SWN mean total score: 84.95, SD: 17.5). Conclusions: The performance of the SWN scale in the present study was very similar to that reported by Naber et al. [18] in the original validation study. Large multi-center studies are needed to better establish differences in the subjective experience of schizophrenic patients treated with first- and second-generation APs.

References

  • 1 Jo B. American Psychiatric Association. DSM IV TR 2000
  • 2 Arnt J. Pharmacological differences of classical and novel antipsychotics.  Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1998;  13 7-14
  • 3 Awad A -G. Quality of life issues on medicated schizophrenic patients. In: Nasrhallah H, Shirqui C, Editors Contemporary Issues in Treatment of Schizophrenia. APA Press Washington DC: USA; 1995: p. 833-846
  • 4 Carrick R, Mitchell A, Powell R, Lloyd K. The quest for well-being: a qualitative study of the experience of taking antipsychotic medication.  Psychol Psychother. 2004;  77 19-33
  • 5 De Haan L, Lavalaye J, Linszen D, Dingemans P -M, Booje J. Subjective experience and striatal dopamine D2 receptor occupancy in patients with schizophrenia stabilized by olanzapine or risperidone.  Am J Psychiatry. 2000;  157 1019-1020
  • 6 De Haan L, Van Bruggen M, Lavelaye J, Booij J, Dingemans P -M, Linszen D. Subjective experience and D2 receptor occupancy in patients with recent onset schizophrenia treated with low dose olanzapine or haloperidol: a randomized, double bind study.  Am J Psychiatry. 2003;  160 303-309
  • 7 De Haan L, Lavalaye J, Van Bruggen M, Van Nimwegen L, Booij J, Van Amesloort T. et al . Subjective experience and dopamine D2 receptors occupancy in patients treated with antipsychotics: clinical implications.  Can J Psychiatry. 2004;  49 290-296
  • 8 Gerlach J, Larsen E B. Subjective experience and mental side effects of antipsychotic treatment.  Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1999;  99 113-117
  • 9 Hogan T P, Awad A G, Eastwood R. A self report scale predicting of drug compliance in schizophrenics: reliability and discriminative validity.  Psychol Med. 1983;  13 177-183
  • 10 Hogan T P, Awad A G. Subjective response to neuroleptics and outcome in schizophrenia: a re-examination comparing two measures.  Psychol Med. 1992;  22 347-352
  • 11 Kampman O, Lehtien K, Lassila V, Poutanen O, Koivisto A M. Attitudes towards neuroleptic treatment: reliability and validity of Attitude towards Neuroleptic Treatment (ANT) questionnaire.  Schizophr Res. 2000;  45 223-234
  • 12 Karow A, Naber D. Subjective well-being and quality of life under atypical antipsychotic treatment.  Psychopharmacology. 2002;  162 3-10
  • 13 Kluge M, Wehmeier P M, Dittman R W, Lenger F, Czekalla L, Lehemann M. et al . A simple switching strategy for inadequately treated patients with schizophrenia to olanzapina; changes in psychopathology and subjective well-being.  Pharmachopsych. 2005;  38 6-12
  • 14 Knudsen H C, Vazquez-Barquero J L, Welcher B, Gaite L, Becker T, Chisholm D. et al . Translation and cross cultural adaptation of outcome measurement for schizophrenia.  Br J Psychiatry. 2000;  177 8-14
  • 15 Lambert M, Graf Shimmelmann B, Karow D, Naber D. Subjective well-being and initial dysphoric reaction under antipsychotic drugs-concepts. Measurement and Clinical relevance. Pharmachopsychiatry 36 Suppl 3: S181-190
  • 16 Naber D. A self-rating to measure subjective effects of neuroleptic drugs, relationships to objective psychopathology, quality of life, compliance and other clinical variables.  Int Clin Pscychopharmacol. 1995;  10 133-138
  • 17 Naber D, Karow A. Good tolerability equals good results: the patient’s prospective.  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2001;  11 391-396
  • 18 Naber D, Moriz S, Lambert M, Pajonk R, Holzbach R, Mass R, Andersen B. Improvement of schizophrenic patients’ subjective well-being under atypical antipsychotic drugs.  Schizophr Res. 2001;  50 79-88
  • 19 Naber D, Karow A, Lambert M. Psychosocial outcomes in patients with schizophrenia: quality of life and reintegration.  Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2002;  15 31-36
  • 20 Naber D, Riedel M, Klimke A, Vorbach E U, Lambert M, Kuhn K U, Bender S. et al . Randomized double blind comparison of olanzapine vs. clozapine on subjective well-being and clinical outcome in patients with schizophrenia.  Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2005;  111 106-115
  • 21 Ramaekers J C, Louwerens J W, MuntJewerff N D, Milius H, de Bie A, Rosenzweig P, Patat A. et al . Psychomotor, Cognitive, extrapyramidal, and affective functions of healthy volunteers during treatment with an atypical (amisulpride) and a classic (haloperidol) antipsychotic.  J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1999;  19 209-221
  • 22 Rossi A, Arduini L, Stratta P, Pallanti S. Subjective experience and subjective response to neuroleptics in schizophrenia.  Compr Psychiatry. 2000;  41 446-449
  • 23 Rossi A, Arduini L, De Cataldo S, Stratta P. Gli aspetti soggettivi del trattamento con farmaci antipsicotici: studio di validazione della versione italiana della Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI).  Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2001;  10 107-114
  • 24 Simonsen E, Mortensen E L. Difficulties in translation of personality scales.  J Personal Disord. 1990;  4 290-306
  • 25 Van Putten T. Subjective response as a predictor of outcome in pharmacotherapy.  Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1978;  35 477-480
  • 26 Voruganti L, Awad G. Personal evaluation of transitions in treatment (PETiT) a scale to measure subjective aspects of antipsichotic drug therapy in schizophrenia.  Schizophr Res. 2002;  56 37-46
  • 27 Weiden P J, Rapkin B, Mott T. Rating of Medication Influences (ROMI) scale in schizophrenia.  Schizophr Bull. 1994;  29 269-275

Prof. Cesario Bellantuono

Sezione di Psichiatria e Psicologia Clinica

Dipartimento di Medicina e Sanità Pubblica

Università di Verona

Policlinico ”G. Rossi”

Piazza ”L. Scuro”

37134 - VERONA

Italy

Phone: +39.045.8074.442

Fax: +39.3387004577

Email: cesario.bellantuono@univr.it

    >