Comparison of Cervical Volume and Cervical Length to Predict Preterm Delivery by Transvaginal Ultrasound

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate predictive value of cervical volume and length measurement for preterm delivery in low-risk pregnancies by transvaginal ultrasound. Two hundred fifty pregnant women were underwent ultrasound examination at 22 weeks of gestation by transvaginal route. Cervical length, width, and anteroposterior diameters were measured and cervical volume was calculated. All subjects were observed until term. Predictive values of cervical length and cervical volume were calculated and compared with predict preterm delivery. Preterm delivery occurred in 18 patients (7.2%). Mean cervical length and volume were statistically different between term and preterm delivered patients (p = 0.001). Areas under curves were 0.913 for cervical volume and 0.923 for cervical length; this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.289). Sensitivity of cervical volume was 73.3% for 32-mL cut-off value with 12.85% false-positive rate and cervical length had 80% sensitivity at the 33.15-mm cut-off value with 12.7% false-positive rate. Cervical volume measurement by two-dimensional ultrasound did not add any benefit compared with the cervical length measurement for prediction of preterm delivery.

KEYWORDS

Preterm delivery - cervical length - cervical volume

REFERENCES

• 1 Copper R L, Goldenberg R L, Creasy R K et al.. A multicenter study of preterm birth weight and gestational age-specific mortality.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;  168 78-84
• 2 Iams J D. Prediction and early detection of preterm labor.  Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  101 402-412
• 3 Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Malagrida L et al.. Evaluating the risk of preterm delivery: a comparison of fetal fibronectin and transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;  176 196-199
• 4 Berghella V, Bega G, Tolosa J E, Berghella M. Ultrasound assessment of the cervix.  Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  46 947-962
• 5 Iams J D, Paraskos J, Landon M B, Teteris J N, Johnson F F. Cervical sonography in preterm delivery.  Obstet Gynecol. 1994;  84 40-46
• 6 Crane J M, Van Den Hof M, Armson B A, Liston R. Transvaginal ultrasound in the prediction of preterm delivery: singleton and twin gestations.  Obstet Gynecol. 1997;  90 357-363
• 7 Iams J D, Goldenberg R L, Meis P J et al.. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  334 567-572
• 8 Tongsong T, Kamprapanth P, Srisomboon J, Wanapirak C, Piyamongkol W, Sirichotiyakul S. Single transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length early in the third trimester as a predictor of preterm delivery.  Obstet Gynecol. 1995;  86 184-187
• 9 Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V. Sonographic measurement of uterine cervix at 18-22 weeks' gestation and the risk of preterm delivery.  Obstet Gynecol. 1998;  92 902-907
• 10 Bega G, Lev-Toaff A, Kuhlman K, Berghella V, Parker L, Goldberg B. Three-dimensional multiplanar transvaginal ultrasound of cervix in pregnancy.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;  16 351-358
• 11 Severi F M, Bocchi P, Florio P, Piccolini E, D'Aniello G, Petraglia F. Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound in the assessment of the cervix to predict preterm delivery.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003;  29 1261-1265
• 12 Hoesli I M, Surbek D V, Tercanli S, Holzgreve W. Three dimensional volume measurement of the cervix during pregnancy compared to conventional 2D-sonography.  Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1999;  64 115-119
• 13 Rozenberg P, Rafii A, Senat M V, Dujardin A, Rapon J, Ville Y. Predictive value of two-dimensional and three dimensional multiplanar ultrasound evaluation of cervix in preterm labor.  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003;  13 237-241
• 14 Strauss A, Heer I, Fuchshuber S, Janssen U, Hillemannns P, Hepp H. Sonographic cervical volumetry in higher order multiple gestation.  Fetal Diagn Ther. 2001;  16 346-353
• 15 Sample W F, Lippe B M, Gyepes M T. Gray-scale ultrasonography of the normal female pelvis.  Radiology. 1977;  125 477-483
• 16 Hanley J A, McNeil B J. The meaning and the use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.  Radiology. 1982;  143 29-36
• 17 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists . Assessment of risk factors for preterm birth: clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 31.  Obstet Gynecol. 2001;  98 709-716
• 18 Mason G C, Maresh M J. Alterations in bladder volume and the ultrasound of the cervix.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;  97 457-458
• 19 Yazici G, Yildiz A, Tiras M B, Arslan M, Kanik A, Oz U. Comparison of transperineal and transvaginal sonography in predicting preterm delivery.  J Clin Ultrasound. 2004;  32 225-230
• 20 Berghella V, Kuhlman K, Weiner S, Texeira L, Wapner R J. Cervical funneling: sonographic criteria predictive of preterm delivery.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;  10 161-166
• 21 Van den Hof M, Crane I. Ultrasound cervical assessment in predicting preterm birth.  Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2001;  23 418-421
• 22 Cicero S, Skentou C, Souka A, Nikolaides K H. Cervical length at 22-24 weeks of gestation: comparison of transvaginal and transperineal-translabial sonography.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;  17 335-340
• 23 Kurtzman J T, Goldsmith L J, Gall S A, Spinnato J A. Transvaginal versus transperineal ultrasonography: a blinded comparison in the assessment of cervical length at midgestation.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;  179 852-857