Introduction: Among the advantages of atypical antipsychotics, the lack of motor symptoms and the improvement of negative, affective, and cognitive symptoms are of clinical relevance. The aim of this study was to compare atypical and typical neuroleptics from the patient’s perspective. Method: To investigate differential efficacy and side effects of neuroleptics, 61 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, who have received typicals for 129 (± 194) and atypicals for 53 (± 68) weeks, were assessed. Results: There is strong evidence in favor of atypical neuroleptics in the domains negative (t = 7.7; P < 0.001), cognitive (t = 10.2; P < 0.001), and affective (t = 5.5; P < 0.001) symptoms. The assessment of atypicals and typicals regarding positive symptoms did not differ and may be an indication of the validity of the patient’s opinion. Regarding tolerability, atypical neuroleptics again are favored because of fewer motor, sexual, and vegetative side effects (t = 4.2; P < 0.001). Discussion: This study focusing on the subjective experience of patients provides further argument in support of the superiority of atypical over typical neuroleptics. The results of this study also point to the benefits of a consumer-orientated view.
References
-
1 American Psychiatric Association, Commitee on Nomenclature and Statistics. DSM-IV: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. American Psychiatric Association 4th ed 1994 Washington, DC;
-
2
Awad A G.
Subjective response to neuroleptics in schizophrenia.
Schizophr Bull.
1993;
19
609-618
-
3
Bobes J, Gutierrez M, Gibert J, Gonzales M P.
Quality of Life in Schizophrenia: long-term follow-up in 362 chronic Spanish schizophrenic outpatients undergoing risperidone maintenance treatment.
Eur Psychiatry.
1998;
13
158-163
-
4
Boitz K, Angermeyer M C, Loffler W, Muller P, Priebe S.
”Rather overweight and mentally present...”. Patients evaluate clozapine.
Psychiatr Prax.
1999;
26
188-193
-
5
Browne S, Garavan J, Gervin M, Roe M, Larkin C, O’Callaghan E.
Quality of life in schizophrenia: insight and subjective response to neuroleptics.
J Nerv Ment Dis.
1998;
186
74-78
-
6
Casey D E.
Motor and mental aspects of extrapyramidal syndromes.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol.
1995;
10 : 105 - 14 Suppl 3
105-114
-
7
Casey D E.
Side effect profiles of new antipsychotic agents.
J Clin Psychiatry.
1996;
57 Suppl 11
40-5; discussion 46 - 52 : 40 - 45
-
8
Colonna L, Saleem P, Dondey-Nouvel L, Rein W.
Long-term safety and efficacy of amisulpride in subchronic or chronic schizophrenia. Amisulpride Study Group.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol.
2000;
15
13-22
-
9
DeQuardo J R, Tandon R.
Do atypical antipsychotic medications favorably alter the long-term course of schizophrenia?.
J Psychiatr Res.
1998;
32
229-242
-
10
Dilling H, Dittmann V.
[Psychiatric diagnosis following the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10)].
Nervenarzt..
1990;
61
259-270
-
11
Geddes J, Freemantle N, Harrison P, Bebbington P.
Atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia: systematic overview and meta-regression analysis.
BMJ.
2000;
321
1371-1376
-
12
Hellewell J S.
Patients’ subjective experiences of antipsychotics: clinical relevance.
CNS Drugs.
2002;
16
457-471
-
13
Kane J M.
Extrapyramidal side effects are unacceptable.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol.
2001;
11 Suppl 4
S397-403
-
14
Lambert M, Schimmelmann B G, Karow A, Naber D.
Subjective well-being and initial dysphoric reaction under antipsychotic drugs - concepts, measurement and clinical relevance.
Pharmacopsychiatry.
2003;
36 Suppl 3
S181-190
-
15 Lieberman J A, Stroup S, McEvoy J P, Swartz M, Rosenheck R, Perkins D, Keefe R, Davis S, Davis C, Lebowitz B, Severe J, Hsiao J. Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. N Engl J Med 5 A.D 353: 1209-1223
-
16
Moritz S, Krausz M, Gottwalz E, Lambert M, Perro C, Ganzer S, Naber D.
Cognitive dysfunction at baseline predicts symptomatic 1-year outcome in first-episode schizophrenics.
Psychopathology.
2000;
33
48-51
-
17
Naber D.
A self-rating to measure subjective effects of neuroleptic drugs, relationships to objective psychopathology, quality of life, compliance and other clinical variables.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol.
1995;
10 Suppl 3
133-8
-
18
Naber D, Moritz S, Lambert M ., Pajonk F, Holzbach R, Mass R, Andresen B.
Improvement of schizophrenic patients; subjective well-being under atypical antipsychotic drugs.
Schizophr Res.
2001;
50(1 - 2)
79-88
-
19
Rettenbacher M A, Burns T, Kemmler G, Fleischhacker W W.
Schizophrenia: attitudes of patients and professional carers towards the illness and antipsychotic medication.
Pharmacopsychiatry.
2004;
37
103-109
-
20
Tollefson G D, Andersen S W.
Should we consider mood disturbance in schizophrenia as an important determinant of quality of life?.
J Clin Psychiatry.
1999;
60 Suppl 5
23-9; discussion 30 : 23 - 29
-
21
Voruganti L, Cortese L, Oyewumi L, Cernovsky Z, Zirul S, Awad A.
Comparative evaluation of conventional and novel antipsychotic drugs with reference to their subjective tolerability, side-effect profile and impact on quality of life.
Schizophr Res.
2000 Jun 16;
43(2.-3.)
135-45
-
22
Voruganti L, Cortese L, Oyewumi L, Cernovsky Z, Zirul S, Awad A.
Comparative evaluation of conventional and novel antipsychotic drugs with reference to their subjective tolerability, side-effect profile and impact on quality of life.
Schizophr Res.
2000;
43
135-145
-
23 Wahlbeck K, Cheine M, Essali M A. Clozapine versus typical neuroleptic medication for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000
A. Karow, M.D.
University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf
Department for Psychiatry und Psychotherapy
Martinistr. 52
20246 Hamburg
Phone: 0049-(0)40-42803-2229
Email: karow@uke.uni-hamburg.de
