J Reconstr Microsurg 2005; 21(4): 243-249
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-871751
Copyright © 2005 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Regeneration through Nerve Isografts is Independent of Nerve Geometry

David H. Kawamura1 , Tessa A. Hadlock2 , Ida K. Fox1 , Michael J. Brenner3 , Daniel A. Hunter1 , Susan E. Mackinnon1
  • 1Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
  • 2Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA
  • 3Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Accepted: January 3, 2005

Publikationsdatum:
21. Juni 2005 (online)

Preview

ABSTRACT

Investigators have theorized that tortuosity in nerve grafts may adversely affect nerve regeneration. This study investigated the effect of graft configuration and redundancy on regeneration across 2.5-cm rat sciatic nerve isografts. Thirty-two Lewis rats were randomized to four nerve grafting groups defined by gap distance and isograft conformation. In Group 1, grafts were interposed into a 2-cm gap, resulting in mild graft redundancy. In Groups 2 and 3, grafts were tacked in sinusoidal or omega-shaped configurations, respectively, to bridge a 0.5‐cm gap. In Group 4, grafts were interposed after 1 cm of native sciatic nerve was resected, resulting in no graft redundancy and an interstump distance of 2.5 cm. At 6 weeks, nerve tissue was harvested; subsequent histomorphometric analysis revealed no significant differences in regeneration between groups. These data suggest that regeneration through isografts is independent of the graft geometry and redundancy.

REFERENCES

Susan E MackinnonM.D. 

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery

Washington University School of Medicine, Box 8238, 660 South Euclid Street

St. Louis, MO 63110